利福平不耐受患者的特征和治疗结果

R. Mangat, S.K. Brode, H.K. Mah, M.S. Brar, N.F. Sabur
{"title":"利福平不耐受患者的特征和治疗结果","authors":"R. Mangat, S.K. Brode, H.K. Mah, M.S. Brar, N.F. Sabur","doi":"10.5588/ijtldopen.23.0466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDRifampicin (RIF) is considered the backbone of TB treatment, but adverse effects often limit its use.METHODSThis retrospective cohort study examined patients treated\n for TB disease at our institution, and compared those who received RIF to those who were intolerant to RIF.RESULTSA total of 829 patients were included. Seventy-six patients (9%) were intolerant to RIF. Patients with RIF intolerance\n were significantly older (median age: 67 years, IQR 50–78 vs. 48 years, IQR 31–70; P < 0.0001), and were more likely to be female (57% vs. 41%; P = 0.01) and have concurrent diabetes mellitus (37.3% vs. 19%; P < 0.0001) compared to those who tolerated\n RIF. RIF intolerance was most commonly due to transaminitis (25%), cytopenia (14.5%), rash (17.1%) and gastro-intestinal intolerance (7.8%). Twenty patients were subsequently challenged with rifabutin, and this was successful in 70%. The mean treatment duration was significantly longer in\n patients who were intolerant to RIF (335 vs. 270 days; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in treatment outcomes.CONCLUSIONRIF intolerance is more common in older patients, females, and those with concurrent\n diabetes mellitus. Patients who could not tolerate RIF had a longer duration of therapy, but no difference in treatment outcomes. When attempted, rifabutin was well tolerated in most patients with a previous RIF-related adverse event.","PeriodicalId":516613,"journal":{"name":"IJTLD OPEN","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics of and treatment outcomes in rifampicin-intolerant patients\",\"authors\":\"R. Mangat, S.K. Brode, H.K. Mah, M.S. Brar, N.F. Sabur\",\"doi\":\"10.5588/ijtldopen.23.0466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUNDRifampicin (RIF) is considered the backbone of TB treatment, but adverse effects often limit its use.METHODSThis retrospective cohort study examined patients treated\\n for TB disease at our institution, and compared those who received RIF to those who were intolerant to RIF.RESULTSA total of 829 patients were included. Seventy-six patients (9%) were intolerant to RIF. Patients with RIF intolerance\\n were significantly older (median age: 67 years, IQR 50–78 vs. 48 years, IQR 31–70; P < 0.0001), and were more likely to be female (57% vs. 41%; P = 0.01) and have concurrent diabetes mellitus (37.3% vs. 19%; P < 0.0001) compared to those who tolerated\\n RIF. RIF intolerance was most commonly due to transaminitis (25%), cytopenia (14.5%), rash (17.1%) and gastro-intestinal intolerance (7.8%). Twenty patients were subsequently challenged with rifabutin, and this was successful in 70%. The mean treatment duration was significantly longer in\\n patients who were intolerant to RIF (335 vs. 270 days; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in treatment outcomes.CONCLUSIONRIF intolerance is more common in older patients, females, and those with concurrent\\n diabetes mellitus. Patients who could not tolerate RIF had a longer duration of therapy, but no difference in treatment outcomes. When attempted, rifabutin was well tolerated in most patients with a previous RIF-related adverse event.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJTLD OPEN\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJTLD OPEN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtldopen.23.0466\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJTLD OPEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtldopen.23.0466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景利福平(RIF)被认为是结核病治疗的主要药物,但其不良反应往往限制了它的使用。方法这项回顾性队列研究检查了在我院接受治疗的结核病患者,并比较了接受 RIF 和不耐受 RIF 的患者。结果共纳入 829 名患者,其中 76 名患者(9%)对 RIF 不耐受。与耐受 RIF 的患者相比,不耐受 RIF 的患者年龄明显偏大(中位年龄:67 岁,IQR 50-78 岁 vs. 48 岁,IQR 31-70 岁;P < 0.0001),更有可能是女性(57% vs. 41%;P = 0.01)和并发糖尿病(37.3% vs. 19%;P < 0.0001)。RIF 不耐受最常见的原因是转氨酶炎(25%)、全血细胞减少(14.5%)、皮疹(17.1%)和胃肠道不耐受(7.8%)。20 名患者随后接受了利福布汀治疗,70% 的患者治疗成功。对 RIF 不耐受的患者的平均治疗时间明显更长(335 天对 270 天;P < 0.001)。结论RIF不耐受在老年患者、女性和并发糖尿病患者中更为常见。不能耐受 RIF 的患者治疗时间较长,但治疗效果无差异。在尝试使用利福布汀时,大多数曾发生过 RIF 相关不良事件的患者都能很好地耐受利福布汀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characteristics of and treatment outcomes in rifampicin-intolerant patients
BACKGROUNDRifampicin (RIF) is considered the backbone of TB treatment, but adverse effects often limit its use.METHODSThis retrospective cohort study examined patients treated for TB disease at our institution, and compared those who received RIF to those who were intolerant to RIF.RESULTSA total of 829 patients were included. Seventy-six patients (9%) were intolerant to RIF. Patients with RIF intolerance were significantly older (median age: 67 years, IQR 50–78 vs. 48 years, IQR 31–70; P < 0.0001), and were more likely to be female (57% vs. 41%; P = 0.01) and have concurrent diabetes mellitus (37.3% vs. 19%; P < 0.0001) compared to those who tolerated RIF. RIF intolerance was most commonly due to transaminitis (25%), cytopenia (14.5%), rash (17.1%) and gastro-intestinal intolerance (7.8%). Twenty patients were subsequently challenged with rifabutin, and this was successful in 70%. The mean treatment duration was significantly longer in patients who were intolerant to RIF (335 vs. 270 days; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in treatment outcomes.CONCLUSIONRIF intolerance is more common in older patients, females, and those with concurrent diabetes mellitus. Patients who could not tolerate RIF had a longer duration of therapy, but no difference in treatment outcomes. When attempted, rifabutin was well tolerated in most patients with a previous RIF-related adverse event.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cost and cost-effectiveness of BPaL regimen used in drug-resistant TB treatment in the Philippines Evaluation of a national multidisciplinary meeting for non-tuberculous mycobacterial disease Leveraging Global Fund’s investments to expand innovative public-private provider engagement in TB Real-life use of delamanid: results from the European post-authorisation safety study Embracing novel thinking to safeguard against airborne pathogens in indoor spaces
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1