管理人员能 "感受 "到团队吗?管理者在执行创造性任务时的自主反应

IF 0.7 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY Neuropsychological Trends Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.7358/neur-2024-035-balc
M. Balconi, L. Angioletti
{"title":"管理人员能 \"感受 \"到团队吗?管理者在执行创造性任务时的自主反应","authors":"M. Balconi, L. Angioletti","doi":"10.7358/neur-2024-035-balc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed at assessing the psychophysiological correlates of managers, compared to a group of non-managers, during a creative problem-solving dynamic through the use of a psychophysiological method exploiting autonomic measures data collection. Individuals performed a realistic complex problem-solving task (RCPT), a modified version of the NASA Moon survival problem exercise, in two distinct conditions: individually or in groups of three participants. Two main patterns of findings were observed, specifically, for the managers’ group: first, electrodermal activity and cardiac variability indices increased during the group compared to individual condition; second, cardiovascular indices decreased in the above-mentioned condition. No statistically significant results were observed for the non-managers group. Results suggest that managers could be able to “feel”, even at a deeper and psycho-physiological level, which social condition (in this case, the group one) is more suitable for solving a complex problem in a creative way.","PeriodicalId":42015,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychological Trends","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do managers “feel” the group? Managers’ autonomic responses during a creative task\",\"authors\":\"M. Balconi, L. Angioletti\",\"doi\":\"10.7358/neur-2024-035-balc\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed at assessing the psychophysiological correlates of managers, compared to a group of non-managers, during a creative problem-solving dynamic through the use of a psychophysiological method exploiting autonomic measures data collection. Individuals performed a realistic complex problem-solving task (RCPT), a modified version of the NASA Moon survival problem exercise, in two distinct conditions: individually or in groups of three participants. Two main patterns of findings were observed, specifically, for the managers’ group: first, electrodermal activity and cardiac variability indices increased during the group compared to individual condition; second, cardiovascular indices decreased in the above-mentioned condition. No statistically significant results were observed for the non-managers group. Results suggest that managers could be able to “feel”, even at a deeper and psycho-physiological level, which social condition (in this case, the group one) is more suitable for solving a complex problem in a creative way.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropsychological Trends\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropsychological Trends\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7358/neur-2024-035-balc\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychological Trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7358/neur-2024-035-balc","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在通过利用自主测量数据收集的心理生理学方法,评估管理人员与非管理人员在创造性解决问题过程中的心理生理相关性。个人在两种不同的条件下完成了现实复杂问题解决任务(RCPT),即美国国家航空航天局(NASA)月球生存问题练习的改进版:个人或三人一组。特别是在管理人员组中,观察到两种主要的发现模式:第一,与个人条件相比,在小组条件下,皮电活动和心脏变异指数增加;第二,在上述条件下,心血管指数下降。非管理人员组没有观察到有统计学意义的结果。研究结果表明,管理人员甚至可以在更深层次的心理生理层面上 "感受 "到哪种社会条件(在本例中为群体条件)更适合以创造性的方式解决复杂问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do managers “feel” the group? Managers’ autonomic responses during a creative task
This study aimed at assessing the psychophysiological correlates of managers, compared to a group of non-managers, during a creative problem-solving dynamic through the use of a psychophysiological method exploiting autonomic measures data collection. Individuals performed a realistic complex problem-solving task (RCPT), a modified version of the NASA Moon survival problem exercise, in two distinct conditions: individually or in groups of three participants. Two main patterns of findings were observed, specifically, for the managers’ group: first, electrodermal activity and cardiac variability indices increased during the group compared to individual condition; second, cardiovascular indices decreased in the above-mentioned condition. No statistically significant results were observed for the non-managers group. Results suggest that managers could be able to “feel”, even at a deeper and psycho-physiological level, which social condition (in this case, the group one) is more suitable for solving a complex problem in a creative way.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Neurocognitive empowerment, embodied practices, and peak performance in sports: case studies and future challenges Do managers “feel” the group? Managers’ autonomic responses during a creative task A short review of working memory and attention in depression Investigating the impact of mindful breathing meditation on brain waves: a study on young adults Evaluation of learning disability performance in children with cognitive neuropsychological assessment study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1