可持续出行行为干预的循证实践:基于知识图谱的系统回顾

IF 7.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering-English Edition Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jtte.2023.10.001
Jian Li, Chenjie Xu
{"title":"可持续出行行为干预的循证实践:基于知识图谱的系统回顾","authors":"Jian Li,&nbsp;Chenjie Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.jtte.2023.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sustainable travel behavior intervention is an essential strategy to promote the development of urban transportation. The interventions offer personalized strategies based on certain scenario and participants to promote its effectiveness over hard travel restrictions. However, personalized strategies may also bring about difficulties to identify the actual effect of the measures. Furthermore, based on current practice, to make full use of travel behavior interventions, it is necessary to construct a unified methodological evidence-based framework to assess the reliability and effectiveness of travel behavior intervention studies. In response to these issues, we applied evidence-based knowledge graph to the field of sustainable travel behavior interventions to help decision supporters design sustainable travel behavior interventions wisely and in turn avoid excessive use of hard travel restrictions. We introduced concept of evidence-based practice to conduct a systematic analysis concerning reliability and validity of current full volume empirical studies by dimensions of scenarios, types of interventions and targets. In addition, we took advantage of high extensivity and integrability of knowledge graph to organize evidence-based related elements. Result of the systematic analysis shows that in terms of reliability of evidence, school intervention is the best scenario, knowledge incentive is the best intervention type and promoting public transit and walking proportion are the best targets. Oppositely, the reliability of interventions in workplace, belonging to reward and threat along with aiming at changing travel patterns generally and lowering travel carbon emission need to be enhanced. From the study, various research prospects are raised to promote evidence quality in the field of travel behavior intervention implementation. As a pioneer study, our research contributes to the field of urban transportation in introducing concepts of evidence-based practice and enabling optimization and extension of our achievement via the usage of knowledge graph, enhancing reliability and objectivity in urban transportation decision-making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47239,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering-English Edition","volume":"11 2","pages":"Pages 293-311"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095756424000308/pdfft?md5=3314b98572ffa09c3ffd2ec82333c224&pid=1-s2.0-S2095756424000308-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence-based practices in sustainable travel behavior intervention: A knowledge graph-based systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Jian Li,&nbsp;Chenjie Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtte.2023.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Sustainable travel behavior intervention is an essential strategy to promote the development of urban transportation. The interventions offer personalized strategies based on certain scenario and participants to promote its effectiveness over hard travel restrictions. However, personalized strategies may also bring about difficulties to identify the actual effect of the measures. Furthermore, based on current practice, to make full use of travel behavior interventions, it is necessary to construct a unified methodological evidence-based framework to assess the reliability and effectiveness of travel behavior intervention studies. In response to these issues, we applied evidence-based knowledge graph to the field of sustainable travel behavior interventions to help decision supporters design sustainable travel behavior interventions wisely and in turn avoid excessive use of hard travel restrictions. We introduced concept of evidence-based practice to conduct a systematic analysis concerning reliability and validity of current full volume empirical studies by dimensions of scenarios, types of interventions and targets. In addition, we took advantage of high extensivity and integrability of knowledge graph to organize evidence-based related elements. Result of the systematic analysis shows that in terms of reliability of evidence, school intervention is the best scenario, knowledge incentive is the best intervention type and promoting public transit and walking proportion are the best targets. Oppositely, the reliability of interventions in workplace, belonging to reward and threat along with aiming at changing travel patterns generally and lowering travel carbon emission need to be enhanced. From the study, various research prospects are raised to promote evidence quality in the field of travel behavior intervention implementation. As a pioneer study, our research contributes to the field of urban transportation in introducing concepts of evidence-based practice and enabling optimization and extension of our achievement via the usage of knowledge graph, enhancing reliability and objectivity in urban transportation decision-making.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering-English Edition\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 293-311\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095756424000308/pdfft?md5=3314b98572ffa09c3ffd2ec82333c224&pid=1-s2.0-S2095756424000308-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering-English Edition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095756424000308\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering-English Edition","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095756424000308","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可持续出行行为干预是促进城市交通发展的重要战略。干预措施根据特定的场景和参与者提供个性化的策略,以提高其有效性,而不是硬性的出行限制。然而,个性化策略也会给措施实际效果的确定带来困难。此外,根据目前的实践,要充分利用出行行为干预措施,有必要构建统一的循证方法框架,以评估出行行为干预研究的可靠性和有效性。针对这些问题,我们将循证知识图谱应用于可持续出行行为干预领域,帮助决策支持者明智地设计可持续出行行为干预措施,进而避免过度使用硬性出行限制措施。我们引入了循证实践的概念,按照情景、干预类型和目标等维度,对当前全量实证研究的可靠性和有效性进行了系统分析。此外,我们还利用知识图谱的高度延展性和可整合性,对循证相关要素进行了组织。系统分析结果表明,就证据可靠性而言,学校干预是最佳方案,知识激励是最佳干预类型,促进公共交通和步行比例是最佳目标。相反,在工作场所,属于奖励和威胁的干预措施以及旨在改变一般出行模式和降低出行碳排放的干预措施的可靠性有待提高。本研究提出了各种研究前景,以提高出行行为干预实施领域的证据质量。作为一项开创性研究,我们的研究为城市交通领域引入循证实践的概念做出了贡献,并通过使用知识图谱优化和扩展了我们的成果,提高了城市交通决策的可靠性和客观性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evidence-based practices in sustainable travel behavior intervention: A knowledge graph-based systematic review

Sustainable travel behavior intervention is an essential strategy to promote the development of urban transportation. The interventions offer personalized strategies based on certain scenario and participants to promote its effectiveness over hard travel restrictions. However, personalized strategies may also bring about difficulties to identify the actual effect of the measures. Furthermore, based on current practice, to make full use of travel behavior interventions, it is necessary to construct a unified methodological evidence-based framework to assess the reliability and effectiveness of travel behavior intervention studies. In response to these issues, we applied evidence-based knowledge graph to the field of sustainable travel behavior interventions to help decision supporters design sustainable travel behavior interventions wisely and in turn avoid excessive use of hard travel restrictions. We introduced concept of evidence-based practice to conduct a systematic analysis concerning reliability and validity of current full volume empirical studies by dimensions of scenarios, types of interventions and targets. In addition, we took advantage of high extensivity and integrability of knowledge graph to organize evidence-based related elements. Result of the systematic analysis shows that in terms of reliability of evidence, school intervention is the best scenario, knowledge incentive is the best intervention type and promoting public transit and walking proportion are the best targets. Oppositely, the reliability of interventions in workplace, belonging to reward and threat along with aiming at changing travel patterns generally and lowering travel carbon emission need to be enhanced. From the study, various research prospects are raised to promote evidence quality in the field of travel behavior intervention implementation. As a pioneer study, our research contributes to the field of urban transportation in introducing concepts of evidence-based practice and enabling optimization and extension of our achievement via the usage of knowledge graph, enhancing reliability and objectivity in urban transportation decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
6.30%
发文量
402
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) serves as a renowned academic platform facilitating the exchange and exploration of innovative ideas in the realm of transportation. Our journal aims to foster theoretical and experimental research in transportation and welcomes the submission of exceptional peer-reviewed papers on engineering, planning, management, and information technology. We are dedicated to expediting the peer review process and ensuring timely publication of top-notch research in this field.
期刊最新文献
Potential applications for composite utilization of rubber and plastic in asphalt pavements: A critical review Design equations for maximum stress concentration factors for concrete-filled steel tubular K-joints A systematic review of digital twins for electric vehicles Architecture, application, and prospect of digital twin for highway infrastructure Assessing the risk of pedestrian crossing behavior on suburban roads using structural equation model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1