利用机器学习技术对膜法脱盐过程中的渗透体积进行建模和评估

IF 3 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Digital Chemical Engineering Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI:10.1016/j.dche.2024.100154
Vinod Kumar S , Mukil S , Naveen P , Senthil Rathi B
{"title":"利用机器学习技术对膜法脱盐过程中的渗透体积进行建模和评估","authors":"Vinod Kumar S ,&nbsp;Mukil S ,&nbsp;Naveen P ,&nbsp;Senthil Rathi B","doi":"10.1016/j.dche.2024.100154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Machine learning methodologies are gaining significant recognition as an effective approach for tackling and modelling challenges related to membranes. This study delves into the utilization of machine learning algorithms to forecast the quality of reverse osmosis (RO) water. Specifically, we conduct a comparative analysis of four popular algorithms: decision tree, random forest, support vector machine (SVM), and K-nearest neighbours (KNN). Our dataset comprises essential water quality evaluation features such as temperature, pH, and conductivity. Using these features, we train and test our models, evaluating their performance with metrics like accuracy and root-mean-squared error (RMSE). The outcomes indicate that all four algorithms perform admirably in predicting RO water quality, achieving accuracy scores ranging from 80 % to 95 %. Notably, KNN stands out with the highest accuracy score of 95 %, establishing it as the most effective algorithm for this task. Besides its performance, KNN's simplicity of implementation and interpretability make it a pragmatic choice for real-world applications. This study serves as compelling evidence of the potential of machine learning algorithms for forecasting RO water quality, particularly highlighting KNN's effectiveness in this context. To further enhance the accuracy of RO water quality prediction, future research could explore the inclusion of other features or alternative algorithms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72815,"journal":{"name":"Digital Chemical Engineering","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100154"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772508124000164/pdfft?md5=7d7576b1e6be7fb47bf18504030eb571&pid=1-s2.0-S2772508124000164-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling and evaluation of the permeate volume in membrane desalination processes using machine-learning techniques\",\"authors\":\"Vinod Kumar S ,&nbsp;Mukil S ,&nbsp;Naveen P ,&nbsp;Senthil Rathi B\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dche.2024.100154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Machine learning methodologies are gaining significant recognition as an effective approach for tackling and modelling challenges related to membranes. This study delves into the utilization of machine learning algorithms to forecast the quality of reverse osmosis (RO) water. Specifically, we conduct a comparative analysis of four popular algorithms: decision tree, random forest, support vector machine (SVM), and K-nearest neighbours (KNN). Our dataset comprises essential water quality evaluation features such as temperature, pH, and conductivity. Using these features, we train and test our models, evaluating their performance with metrics like accuracy and root-mean-squared error (RMSE). The outcomes indicate that all four algorithms perform admirably in predicting RO water quality, achieving accuracy scores ranging from 80 % to 95 %. Notably, KNN stands out with the highest accuracy score of 95 %, establishing it as the most effective algorithm for this task. Besides its performance, KNN's simplicity of implementation and interpretability make it a pragmatic choice for real-world applications. This study serves as compelling evidence of the potential of machine learning algorithms for forecasting RO water quality, particularly highlighting KNN's effectiveness in this context. To further enhance the accuracy of RO water quality prediction, future research could explore the inclusion of other features or alternative algorithms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Chemical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772508124000164/pdfft?md5=7d7576b1e6be7fb47bf18504030eb571&pid=1-s2.0-S2772508124000164-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Chemical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772508124000164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772508124000164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机器学习方法作为应对与膜有关的挑战并建立模型的有效方法,正在获得广泛认可。本研究深入探讨了如何利用机器学习算法来预测反渗透(RO)水的质量。具体来说,我们对四种流行算法进行了比较分析:决策树、随机森林、支持向量机(SVM)和 K 近邻(KNN)。我们的数据集包含基本的水质评价特征,如温度、pH 值和电导率。利用这些特征,我们对模型进行了训练和测试,并通过准确率和均方根误差(RMSE)等指标对模型的性能进行了评估。结果表明,所有四种算法在预测反渗透水质方面都表现出色,准确率从 80% 到 95% 不等。值得注意的是,KNN 以 95% 的最高准确率脱颖而出,成为这项任务中最有效的算法。除性能外,KNN 的实施简单、可解释性强,使其成为实际应用中的实用选择。这项研究有力地证明了机器学习算法在反渗透水质预测方面的潜力,尤其突出了 KNN 在这方面的有效性。为了进一步提高反渗透水质预测的准确性,未来的研究可以探索加入其他特征或替代算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modeling and evaluation of the permeate volume in membrane desalination processes using machine-learning techniques

Machine learning methodologies are gaining significant recognition as an effective approach for tackling and modelling challenges related to membranes. This study delves into the utilization of machine learning algorithms to forecast the quality of reverse osmosis (RO) water. Specifically, we conduct a comparative analysis of four popular algorithms: decision tree, random forest, support vector machine (SVM), and K-nearest neighbours (KNN). Our dataset comprises essential water quality evaluation features such as temperature, pH, and conductivity. Using these features, we train and test our models, evaluating their performance with metrics like accuracy and root-mean-squared error (RMSE). The outcomes indicate that all four algorithms perform admirably in predicting RO water quality, achieving accuracy scores ranging from 80 % to 95 %. Notably, KNN stands out with the highest accuracy score of 95 %, establishing it as the most effective algorithm for this task. Besides its performance, KNN's simplicity of implementation and interpretability make it a pragmatic choice for real-world applications. This study serves as compelling evidence of the potential of machine learning algorithms for forecasting RO water quality, particularly highlighting KNN's effectiveness in this context. To further enhance the accuracy of RO water quality prediction, future research could explore the inclusion of other features or alternative algorithms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The trust region filter strategy: Survey of a rigorous approach for optimization with surrogate models Multi-agent distributed control of integrated process networks using an adaptive community detection approach Industrial data-driven machine learning soft sensing for optimal operation of etching tools Process integration technique for targeting carbon credit price subsidy Robust simulation and technical evaluation of large-scale gas oil hydrocracking process via extended water-energy-product (E-WEP) analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1