重症监护中的非医疗处方:混合方法研究。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING Intensive and Critical Care Nursing Pub Date : 2024-04-21 DOI:10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103704
{"title":"重症监护中的非医疗处方:混合方法研究。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Little is known about non-medical prescribers in critical care in the United Kingdom. In 2007, a small survey identified few non-medical prescribers; however, in the intervening years, there have been many changes to the Medicine Act 1968. It is likely that prescribing within the non-medical workforce in critical care has changed significantly.</p></div><div><h3>Aim/s</h3><p>This survey aimed to explore the breadth and diversity of prescribing practices of non-medical prescribers working within the wider critical care environment in the United Kingdom.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Data were collected via an online questionnaire adapted from the 2007 version and distributed by the BACCN to their members between 26th October 2021 and 19th November 2021. Freedom of Information requests were made to the Nursing and Midwifery<span> Council, The Health and Care Professions Council and the General Pharmaceutical Council to understand the number of non-medical prescribers.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The survey elicited 259 responses; 105 respondents identified themselves as non-medical prescribers, and 57 used Patient Group Directions only. In the ICU/HDU, 75 respondents identified as non-medical prescribers, with an additional 45 using Patient Group Directions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Since the last survey, there has been a large increase in the number and representation across all professional groups identifying as a non-medical prescriber and/or utilising patient group directions across critical care. Many staff responded to this survey who were neither NMPs nor utilising PGDs; of these, a large proportion were interested in taking on this additional responsibility.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><p>Many people working within critical care are interested in becoming non-medical prescribers.</p><p>Assists with understanding characteristics of those working as non-medical prescribers within critical care.</p><p>Shows variations in practice in respect to PGDs, authorising of blood products and prescribing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51322,"journal":{"name":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-medical prescribing in critical care: A mixed methods study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Little is known about non-medical prescribers in critical care in the United Kingdom. In 2007, a small survey identified few non-medical prescribers; however, in the intervening years, there have been many changes to the Medicine Act 1968. It is likely that prescribing within the non-medical workforce in critical care has changed significantly.</p></div><div><h3>Aim/s</h3><p>This survey aimed to explore the breadth and diversity of prescribing practices of non-medical prescribers working within the wider critical care environment in the United Kingdom.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Data were collected via an online questionnaire adapted from the 2007 version and distributed by the BACCN to their members between 26th October 2021 and 19th November 2021. Freedom of Information requests were made to the Nursing and Midwifery<span> Council, The Health and Care Professions Council and the General Pharmaceutical Council to understand the number of non-medical prescribers.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The survey elicited 259 responses; 105 respondents identified themselves as non-medical prescribers, and 57 used Patient Group Directions only. In the ICU/HDU, 75 respondents identified as non-medical prescribers, with an additional 45 using Patient Group Directions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Since the last survey, there has been a large increase in the number and representation across all professional groups identifying as a non-medical prescriber and/or utilising patient group directions across critical care. Many staff responded to this survey who were neither NMPs nor utilising PGDs; of these, a large proportion were interested in taking on this additional responsibility.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><p>Many people working within critical care are interested in becoming non-medical prescribers.</p><p>Assists with understanding characteristics of those working as non-medical prescribers within critical care.</p><p>Shows variations in practice in respect to PGDs, authorising of blood products and prescribing.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724000892\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724000892","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景对英国重症监护中的非医疗处方者知之甚少。2007 年,一项小规模调查发现,非医疗处方者为数不多;然而,在这几年间,1968 年《医学法案》发生了许多变化。本调查旨在探索在英国更广泛的重症监护环境中工作的非医疗处方人员的处方实践的广度和多样性。调查方法通过在线问卷收集数据,该问卷改编自 2007 年版本,由 BACCN 在 2021 年 10 月 26 日至 2021 年 11 月 19 日期间分发给其成员。为了了解非医疗处方人员的数量,我们向护理与助产委员会、健康与护理专业委员会和通用药学委员会提出了信息自由申请。结果调查共收到 259 份回复;105 位受访者表示自己是非医疗处方人员,57 位受访者仅使用了患者组指令。在重症监护病房/重症加护病房,有 75 名受访者表示自己是非医疗处方者,另有 45 名受访者使用 "患者分组指示"。结论自上次调查以来,所有专业群体中表示自己是非医疗处方者和/或在重症监护病房使用 "患者分组指示 "的人数和比例都有大幅增加。对实践的意义许多在重症监护领域工作的人员都有兴趣成为非医疗处方人员,这有助于了解在重症监护领域作为非医疗处方人员工作的人员的特点,显示了在 PGD、血液制品授权和处方方面的实践差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Non-medical prescribing in critical care: A mixed methods study

Background

Little is known about non-medical prescribers in critical care in the United Kingdom. In 2007, a small survey identified few non-medical prescribers; however, in the intervening years, there have been many changes to the Medicine Act 1968. It is likely that prescribing within the non-medical workforce in critical care has changed significantly.

Aim/s

This survey aimed to explore the breadth and diversity of prescribing practices of non-medical prescribers working within the wider critical care environment in the United Kingdom.

Method

Data were collected via an online questionnaire adapted from the 2007 version and distributed by the BACCN to their members between 26th October 2021 and 19th November 2021. Freedom of Information requests were made to the Nursing and Midwifery Council, The Health and Care Professions Council and the General Pharmaceutical Council to understand the number of non-medical prescribers.

Results

The survey elicited 259 responses; 105 respondents identified themselves as non-medical prescribers, and 57 used Patient Group Directions only. In the ICU/HDU, 75 respondents identified as non-medical prescribers, with an additional 45 using Patient Group Directions.

Conclusion

Since the last survey, there has been a large increase in the number and representation across all professional groups identifying as a non-medical prescriber and/or utilising patient group directions across critical care. Many staff responded to this survey who were neither NMPs nor utilising PGDs; of these, a large proportion were interested in taking on this additional responsibility.

Implications for practice

Many people working within critical care are interested in becoming non-medical prescribers.

Assists with understanding characteristics of those working as non-medical prescribers within critical care.

Shows variations in practice in respect to PGDs, authorising of blood products and prescribing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The aims of Intensive and Critical Care Nursing are to promote excellence of care of critically ill patients by specialist nurses and their professional colleagues; to provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and exchange of research findings, experience and ideas; to develop and enhance the knowledge, skills, attitudes and creative thinking essential to good critical care nursing practice. The journal publishes reviews, updates and feature articles in addition to original papers and significant preliminary communications. Articles may deal with any part of practice including relevant clinical, research, educational, psychological and technological aspects.
期刊最新文献
Prone position in the post COVID-19 era: Old lessons and new challenges for intensive care nurses Moving on from a “good death”: Child- and family-centred end-of-life care in paediatric critical care Impact of new lighting technology versus traditional fluorescent bulbs on sedation and delirium in the ICU Practice and confidence in electrocardiogram interpretation among ICU nurses: A cross-sectional study Prevalence and risk factors of subsyndromal delirium in ICU: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1