英语语言学习者对考试形式的看法和动机:定性研究

Salmane Griche
{"title":"英语语言学习者对考试形式的看法和动机:定性研究","authors":"Salmane Griche","doi":"10.36892/ijlls.v6i1.1627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study is to explore the perceptions of students at the English department at Ibn Tofail University towards exam format, and the motivation behind their preferences. In order to achieve these objectives, a qualitative methodology was employed. The subjects of this study are sixteen undergraduate students currently enrolled at the English department at ITU, and three students who recently graduated from the same university. An open-ended questionnaire is used to glean the necessary information, and to allow the subjects to freely express their opinions and attitudes with minimal influence. The collected data is analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings show that ITU’s EFL students believe that MCQ exams cannot properly assess writing skills, or competency in certain courses. The MCQ exam preference is mainly motivated by the practicality of the format, while the written format preference is mainly motivated by the fact that it encourages deep learning, enables higher cognitive levels of thinking, and improves writing skills.","PeriodicalId":34879,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language and Literary Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"English Language Learners’ Perception and Motivation Towards Exam Format: A Qualitative Study\",\"authors\":\"Salmane Griche\",\"doi\":\"10.36892/ijlls.v6i1.1627\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this study is to explore the perceptions of students at the English department at Ibn Tofail University towards exam format, and the motivation behind their preferences. In order to achieve these objectives, a qualitative methodology was employed. The subjects of this study are sixteen undergraduate students currently enrolled at the English department at ITU, and three students who recently graduated from the same university. An open-ended questionnaire is used to glean the necessary information, and to allow the subjects to freely express their opinions and attitudes with minimal influence. The collected data is analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings show that ITU’s EFL students believe that MCQ exams cannot properly assess writing skills, or competency in certain courses. The MCQ exam preference is mainly motivated by the practicality of the format, while the written format preference is mainly motivated by the fact that it encourages deep learning, enables higher cognitive levels of thinking, and improves writing skills.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Language and Literary Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Language and Literary Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v6i1.1627\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language and Literary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v6i1.1627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨伊本-托菲尔大学英语系学生对考试形式的看法及其偏好背后的动机。为了实现这些目标,本研究采用了定性方法。本研究的对象是目前在伊本-托菲尔大学英语系就读的 16 名本科生和 3 名刚从该大学毕业的学生。研究采用了开放式问卷来收集必要的信息,并允许研究对象自由表达意见和态度,尽量减少对他们的影响。收集到的数据采用主题分析法进行分析。调查结果显示,伊贸大的 EFL 学生认为 MCQ 考试无法正确评估写作技巧或某些课程的能力。偏好 MCQ 考试的主要原因是考试形式的实用性,而偏好书面形式的主要原因是书面形式能鼓励学生深入学习,提高思维认知水平,并能提高写作能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
English Language Learners’ Perception and Motivation Towards Exam Format: A Qualitative Study
The objective of this study is to explore the perceptions of students at the English department at Ibn Tofail University towards exam format, and the motivation behind their preferences. In order to achieve these objectives, a qualitative methodology was employed. The subjects of this study are sixteen undergraduate students currently enrolled at the English department at ITU, and three students who recently graduated from the same university. An open-ended questionnaire is used to glean the necessary information, and to allow the subjects to freely express their opinions and attitudes with minimal influence. The collected data is analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings show that ITU’s EFL students believe that MCQ exams cannot properly assess writing skills, or competency in certain courses. The MCQ exam preference is mainly motivated by the practicality of the format, while the written format preference is mainly motivated by the fact that it encourages deep learning, enables higher cognitive levels of thinking, and improves writing skills.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Gender as a ‘Discursive Practice’ in Romance Discourse Conceptual Review: Cultivating Learner Autonomy Through Self-Directed Learning & Self-Regulated Learning: A Socio-Constructivist Exploration Impact and Identities as Revealed in Tourists' Perceptions of the Linguistic Landscape in Tourist Destinations English Language Learners’ Perception and Motivation Towards Exam Format: A Qualitative Study Essay Writing Strategies Employed by English-Majored Sophomores at A University in Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1