文章:数字市场法》与 "打地鼠 "挑战

IF 1.7 2区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Common Market Law Review Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.54648/cola2024024
J. Franck, Martin Peitz
{"title":"文章:数字市场法》与 \"打地鼠 \"挑战","authors":"J. Franck, Martin Peitz","doi":"10.54648/cola2024024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article addresses the implementation of the Digital Market Act’s rules on anti-circumvention. An effects-based approach is presented and a three-step methodology is proposed to identify whether a certain practice should be conceptualized as circumventing an obligation. This approach is applied to several practices suspected of circumventing the ban on parity clauses and an analysis is carried out to establish how the results fit into the Digital Market Act’s concept and instruments for avoiding circumvention. Moreover, the role that the anti-circumvention rules may play in safeguarding the effectiveness of the restrictions on tying and self-preferencing in ranking are elaborated on, thus illustrating how they may operate to future-proof the Digital Markets Act but also where their limitations lie.\nDigital Markets Act, anti-circumvention, antitrust law, price parity clauses, bundling, self-preferencing","PeriodicalId":47406,"journal":{"name":"Common Market Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Article: The Digital Markets Act and the Whack-A-Mole Challenge\",\"authors\":\"J. Franck, Martin Peitz\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/cola2024024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article addresses the implementation of the Digital Market Act’s rules on anti-circumvention. An effects-based approach is presented and a three-step methodology is proposed to identify whether a certain practice should be conceptualized as circumventing an obligation. This approach is applied to several practices suspected of circumventing the ban on parity clauses and an analysis is carried out to establish how the results fit into the Digital Market Act’s concept and instruments for avoiding circumvention. Moreover, the role that the anti-circumvention rules may play in safeguarding the effectiveness of the restrictions on tying and self-preferencing in ranking are elaborated on, thus illustrating how they may operate to future-proof the Digital Markets Act but also where their limitations lie.\\nDigital Markets Act, anti-circumvention, antitrust law, price parity clauses, bundling, self-preferencing\",\"PeriodicalId\":47406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Common Market Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Common Market Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2024024\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Common Market Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2024024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了《数字市场法》反规避规则的实施问题。文章介绍了一种基于效果的方法,并提出了一种分三步的方法来确定某种做法是否应被视为规避义务。该方法适用于几种涉嫌规避平等条款禁令的做法,并进行了分析,以确定结果如何符合《数字市场法》的概念和避免规避的手段。此外,还阐述了反规避规则在保障排名中搭售和自我推荐限制的有效性方面可能发挥的作用,从而说明了这些规则如何能够保护《数字市场法》的未来发展,以及它们的局限性所在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Article: The Digital Markets Act and the Whack-A-Mole Challenge
This article addresses the implementation of the Digital Market Act’s rules on anti-circumvention. An effects-based approach is presented and a three-step methodology is proposed to identify whether a certain practice should be conceptualized as circumventing an obligation. This approach is applied to several practices suspected of circumventing the ban on parity clauses and an analysis is carried out to establish how the results fit into the Digital Market Act’s concept and instruments for avoiding circumvention. Moreover, the role that the anti-circumvention rules may play in safeguarding the effectiveness of the restrictions on tying and self-preferencing in ranking are elaborated on, thus illustrating how they may operate to future-proof the Digital Markets Act but also where their limitations lie. Digital Markets Act, anti-circumvention, antitrust law, price parity clauses, bundling, self-preferencing
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
30.40%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: The Common Market Law Review has provided a forum for the keenest legal minds in the fields for more than 40 years. Because of the international composition of its Editorial Board, and in view of the fact that it is able to attract contributions from all over Europe, and from the United States, the Review is able to adopt a unique approach to capitilize Community issues. Each issue contains articles dealing with matters of current interest; the authoritative treatment given to each topic ensures lasting juridical value. This pre-eminent journal brings you detailed, in-depth examination of the most pressing and far-reaching issues on Community Law.
期刊最新文献
Editorial: The passion for security in European societies Equality between EU citizens and third-country nationals when implementing European arrest warrants. The national judge and the weight of facts: O.G. v. Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri Book review: La création du Parquet européen. Simple évolution ou révolution au sein de l’espace judiciaire européen? Edited by Constance Chevallier-Govers and Anne Weyembergh (Brussels: Bruylant, 2021) Book review: Research Handbook on European Union Citizenship Law and Policy: Navigating Challenges and Crises. Edited by Dora Kostakopoulou and Daniel Thym (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2022) Book review: The EU as a Global Digital Actor: Institutionalising Global Data Protection, Trade, and Cybersecurity. by Elaine Fahey (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2022)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1