信息检索中有效性和公平性变化之间的关系模型

IF 1.7 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information Retrieval Journal Pub Date : 2024-04-23 DOI:10.1007/s10791-024-09434-9
Massimo Melucci
{"title":"信息检索中有效性和公平性变化之间的关系模型","authors":"Massimo Melucci","doi":"10.1007/s10791-024-09434-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The requirement that, for fair document retrieval, the documents should be ranked in the order to equally expose authors and organizations has been studied for some years. The fair exposure of a ranking, however, undermines the optimality of the Probability Ranking Principle and as a consequence retrieval effectiveness. It is shown how the variations of fairness and effectiveness can be related by a model. To this end, the paper introduces a fairness measure inspired in Gini’s index of mutability for non-ordinal variables and relates it to a general enough measure of effectiveness, thus modeling the connection between these two dimensions of Information Retrieval. The paper also introduces the measurement of the statistical significance of the fairness measure. An empirical study completes the paper.</p>","PeriodicalId":54352,"journal":{"name":"Information Retrieval Journal","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A model of the relationship between the variations of effectiveness and fairness in information retrieval\",\"authors\":\"Massimo Melucci\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10791-024-09434-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The requirement that, for fair document retrieval, the documents should be ranked in the order to equally expose authors and organizations has been studied for some years. The fair exposure of a ranking, however, undermines the optimality of the Probability Ranking Principle and as a consequence retrieval effectiveness. It is shown how the variations of fairness and effectiveness can be related by a model. To this end, the paper introduces a fairness measure inspired in Gini’s index of mutability for non-ordinal variables and relates it to a general enough measure of effectiveness, thus modeling the connection between these two dimensions of Information Retrieval. The paper also introduces the measurement of the statistical significance of the fairness measure. An empirical study completes the paper.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Retrieval Journal\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Retrieval Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-024-09434-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Retrieval Journal","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-024-09434-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多年来,人们一直在研究这样一个问题,即为了实现公平的文献检索,文献的排序应使作者和机构的曝光率相同。然而,排序的公平性会破坏概率排序原则的最优性,从而影响检索效果。本文展示了如何通过一个模型将公平性和有效性的变化联系起来。为此,本文引入了一种公平性测量方法,其灵感来自基尼指数(Gini's index of mutability for non-ordinal variables),并将其与足够通用的有效性测量方法联系起来,从而为信息检索的这两个维度之间的联系建立模型。本文还介绍了公平度统计意义的测量方法。本文最后还进行了一项实证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A model of the relationship between the variations of effectiveness and fairness in information retrieval

The requirement that, for fair document retrieval, the documents should be ranked in the order to equally expose authors and organizations has been studied for some years. The fair exposure of a ranking, however, undermines the optimality of the Probability Ranking Principle and as a consequence retrieval effectiveness. It is shown how the variations of fairness and effectiveness can be related by a model. To this end, the paper introduces a fairness measure inspired in Gini’s index of mutability for non-ordinal variables and relates it to a general enough measure of effectiveness, thus modeling the connection between these two dimensions of Information Retrieval. The paper also introduces the measurement of the statistical significance of the fairness measure. An empirical study completes the paper.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information Retrieval Journal
Information Retrieval Journal 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
13.5 months
期刊介绍: The journal provides an international forum for the publication of theory, algorithms, analysis and experiments across the broad area of information retrieval. Topics of interest include search, indexing, analysis, and evaluation for applications such as the web, social and streaming media, recommender systems, and text archives. This includes research on human factors in search, bridging artificial intelligence and information retrieval, and domain-specific search applications.
期刊最新文献
Searching rooms with top-k passenger flows using indoor trajectories An innovative approach for PCO morphology segmentation using a novel MOT-SF technique A graph residual generation network for node classification based on multi-information aggregation Similarity-based ranking of videos from fixed-size one-dimensional video signature The accessibility of digital technologies for people with visual impairment and blindness: a scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1