市场上销售的通用树脂胶合剂在牙本质上的触碰固化活化其相关底漆

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of oral science Pub Date : 2024-05-03 DOI:10.2334/josnusd.24-0019
Sarah Abdel-Gawad, Elisabeth Dursun, Romain Ceinos, Stéphane Le Goff, Timothy Fasham, Jean-Pierre Attal, Philippe Francois
{"title":"市场上销售的通用树脂胶合剂在牙本质上的触碰固化活化其相关底漆","authors":"Sarah Abdel-Gawad, Elisabeth Dursun, Romain Ceinos, Stéphane Le Goff, Timothy Fasham, Jean-Pierre Attal, Philippe Francois","doi":"10.2334/josnusd.24-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"</p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The aim of this study was to investigate the dentin shear bond strength (SBS) and bonding interface of three recently developed “universal” resin luting cements based on different modalities.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> The dentin SBS and interfacial analysis of three recently launched “universal” resin luting cements, namely, G-Cem One, RelyX Universal and Panavia SA cement universal, were studied. All bonding protocols, including the previous use of their dedicated primer or universal adhesive in touch-cure mode or light-cure mode were performed. Variolink Esthetic LC used in conjunction with Scotchbond Universal Plus was used as a control group. For each group (<i>n</i> = 9), 10 specimens were tested for dentin SBS and two were examined by scanning electron microscopy. SBS were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test.</p><p><b>Results:</b> SBS values showed that the three “universal” resin luting cements tested exhibit different adhesive behaviors. G-Cem One with its touch-cure activated primer had a greater SBS to dentin (25.5 MPa) than that of the control group (22.1 MPa).</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> “Universal” resin luting cements have variable efficacy when used in self-curing mode. The touch-curing mode is also of concern but may show high potential for some formulations.</p>\n<p></p>","PeriodicalId":16646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Touch-cure activation by marketed universal resin luting cements of their associated primer to dentin\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Abdel-Gawad, Elisabeth Dursun, Romain Ceinos, Stéphane Le Goff, Timothy Fasham, Jean-Pierre Attal, Philippe Francois\",\"doi\":\"10.2334/josnusd.24-0019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"</p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The aim of this study was to investigate the dentin shear bond strength (SBS) and bonding interface of three recently developed “universal” resin luting cements based on different modalities.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> The dentin SBS and interfacial analysis of three recently launched “universal” resin luting cements, namely, G-Cem One, RelyX Universal and Panavia SA cement universal, were studied. All bonding protocols, including the previous use of their dedicated primer or universal adhesive in touch-cure mode or light-cure mode were performed. Variolink Esthetic LC used in conjunction with Scotchbond Universal Plus was used as a control group. For each group (<i>n</i> = 9), 10 specimens were tested for dentin SBS and two were examined by scanning electron microscopy. SBS were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test.</p><p><b>Results:</b> SBS values showed that the three “universal” resin luting cements tested exhibit different adhesive behaviors. G-Cem One with its touch-cure activated primer had a greater SBS to dentin (25.5 MPa) than that of the control group (22.1 MPa).</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> “Universal” resin luting cements have variable efficacy when used in self-curing mode. The touch-curing mode is also of concern but may show high potential for some formulations.</p>\\n<p></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of oral science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of oral science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.24-0019\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.24-0019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是调查最近开发的三种基于不同模式的 "通用 "树脂胶结水门汀的牙本质剪切粘结强度(SBS)和粘结界面:研究了最近推出的三种 "通用型 "树脂粘结水门汀(即 G-Cem One、RelyX Universal 和 Panavia SA 水泥通用型)的牙本质 SBS 和界面分析。对所有粘接方案进行了研究,包括之前在接触固化模式或光固化模式下使用的专用底漆或通用粘合剂。Variolink Esthetic LC 与 Scotchbond Universal Plus 结合使用作为对照组。对每组(n = 9)的 10 个试样进行牙本质 SBS 测试,对其中两个试样进行扫描电子显微镜检查。SBS 采用双向方差分析,然后进行邓尼特检验:SBS 值显示,三种 "通用 "树脂搪瓷水门汀的粘接性能各不相同。与对照组(22.1 兆帕)相比,G-Cem One 与牙本质的 SBS 值(25.5 兆帕)更高:结论:在自固化模式下,"通用 "树脂搪瓷水门汀的功效各不相同。结论:"通用型 "树脂搪瓷水门汀在自固化模式下的功效不一,触碰固化模式也令人担忧,但某些配方可能具有很高的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Touch-cure activation by marketed universal resin luting cements of their associated primer to dentin

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the dentin shear bond strength (SBS) and bonding interface of three recently developed “universal” resin luting cements based on different modalities.

Methods: The dentin SBS and interfacial analysis of three recently launched “universal” resin luting cements, namely, G-Cem One, RelyX Universal and Panavia SA cement universal, were studied. All bonding protocols, including the previous use of their dedicated primer or universal adhesive in touch-cure mode or light-cure mode were performed. Variolink Esthetic LC used in conjunction with Scotchbond Universal Plus was used as a control group. For each group (n = 9), 10 specimens were tested for dentin SBS and two were examined by scanning electron microscopy. SBS were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test.

Results: SBS values showed that the three “universal” resin luting cements tested exhibit different adhesive behaviors. G-Cem One with its touch-cure activated primer had a greater SBS to dentin (25.5 MPa) than that of the control group (22.1 MPa).

Conclusion: “Universal” resin luting cements have variable efficacy when used in self-curing mode. The touch-curing mode is also of concern but may show high potential for some formulations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of oral science
Journal of oral science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
A micro-computed tomographic evaluation of maxillary first molar accessory root canal morphology in a Black South African subpopulation. Attitudes of general and specialist French practitioners toward stage III-IV grade C periodontitis with familial aggregation. Clinical behavior and survival of endodontically treated teeth with or without post placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CAD-CAM for removable partial denture fabrication after marginal mandibulectomy based on a well-adjusted pre-existing denture. Assessment of cytotoxicity, odontoblast-like differentiation, shear bond strength, and microhardness of four orthodontic adhesive composites.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1