Jônatas do Nascimento Alves, Anna Alice Figueiredo de Almeida, Rosiane Yamasaki, Leonardo Wanderley Lopes
{"title":"听者经验、测量尺度和语音任务对声乐质量听觉感知评估可靠性的影响。","authors":"Jônatas do Nascimento Alves, Anna Alice Figueiredo de Almeida, Rosiane Yamasaki, Leonardo Wanderley Lopes","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/20232023175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the influence of the listener experience, measurement scales and the type of speech task on the auditory-perceptual evaluation of the overall severity (OS) of voice deviation and the predominant type of voice (rough, breathy or strain).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>22 listeners, divided into four groups participated in the study: speech-language pathologist specialized in voice (SLP-V), SLP non specialized in voice (SLP-NV), graduate students with auditory-perceptual analysis training (GS-T), and graduate students without auditory-perceptual analysis training (GS-U). The subjects rated the OS of voice deviation and the predominant type of voice of 44 voices by visual analog scale (VAS) and the numerical scale (score \"G\" from GRBAS), corresponding to six speech tasks such as sustained vowel /a/ and /ɛ/, sentences, number counting, running speech, and all five previous tasks together.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sentences obtained the best interrater reliability in each group, using both VAS and GRBAS. SLP-NV group demonstrated the best interrater reliability in OS judgment in different speech tasks using VAS or GRBAS. Sustained vowel (/a/ and /ɛ/) and running speech obtained the best interrater reliability among the groups of listeners in judging the predominant vocal quality. GS-T group got the best result of interrater reliability in judging the predominant vocal quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The time of experience in the auditory-perceptual judgment of the voice, the type of training to which they were submitted, and the type of speech task influence the reliability of the auditory-perceptual evaluation of vocal quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11065405/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of listener experience, measurement scale and speech task on the reliability of auditory-perceptual evaluation of vocal quality.\",\"authors\":\"Jônatas do Nascimento Alves, Anna Alice Figueiredo de Almeida, Rosiane Yamasaki, Leonardo Wanderley Lopes\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/2317-1782/20232023175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the influence of the listener experience, measurement scales and the type of speech task on the auditory-perceptual evaluation of the overall severity (OS) of voice deviation and the predominant type of voice (rough, breathy or strain).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>22 listeners, divided into four groups participated in the study: speech-language pathologist specialized in voice (SLP-V), SLP non specialized in voice (SLP-NV), graduate students with auditory-perceptual analysis training (GS-T), and graduate students without auditory-perceptual analysis training (GS-U). The subjects rated the OS of voice deviation and the predominant type of voice of 44 voices by visual analog scale (VAS) and the numerical scale (score \\\"G\\\" from GRBAS), corresponding to six speech tasks such as sustained vowel /a/ and /ɛ/, sentences, number counting, running speech, and all five previous tasks together.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sentences obtained the best interrater reliability in each group, using both VAS and GRBAS. SLP-NV group demonstrated the best interrater reliability in OS judgment in different speech tasks using VAS or GRBAS. Sustained vowel (/a/ and /ɛ/) and running speech obtained the best interrater reliability among the groups of listeners in judging the predominant vocal quality. GS-T group got the best result of interrater reliability in judging the predominant vocal quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The time of experience in the auditory-perceptual judgment of the voice, the type of training to which they were submitted, and the type of speech task influence the reliability of the auditory-perceptual evaluation of vocal quality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CoDAS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11065405/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CoDAS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232023175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CoDAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232023175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估听者经验、测量量表和语音任务类型对嗓音偏差总体严重程度(OS)和主要嗓音类型(粗糙、喘息或紧张)的听觉感知评估的影响。方法:22 名听者分为四组参与研究:专门从事嗓音研究的语言病理学家(SLP-V)、非专门从事嗓音研究的语言病理学家(SLP-NV)、受过听觉知觉分析训练的研究生(GS-T)和未受过听觉知觉分析训练的研究生(GS-U)。受试者根据持续元音/a/和/ɛ/、句子、数数、跑步讲话等六项言语任务以及前五项任务,通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)和数字量表(GRBAS中的 "G "分)对44种语音偏差的操作系统和主要语音类型进行评分:使用 VAS 和 GRBAS,句子在各组中都获得了最好的互测信度。在使用 VAS 或 GRBAS 进行的不同语音任务中,SLP-NV 组在操作系统判断方面表现出最佳的互测信度。在各组听者中,持续元音(/a/ 和 /ɛ/)和跑步语音在判断主要发音质量方面的互测信度最佳。GS-T组在判断主音音质方面获得了最佳的听者间信度结果:结论:嗓音听觉判断的经验时间、所接受的培训类型以及语音任务类型都会影响嗓音听觉判断的可靠性。
The influence of listener experience, measurement scale and speech task on the reliability of auditory-perceptual evaluation of vocal quality.
Purpose: To assess the influence of the listener experience, measurement scales and the type of speech task on the auditory-perceptual evaluation of the overall severity (OS) of voice deviation and the predominant type of voice (rough, breathy or strain).
Methods: 22 listeners, divided into four groups participated in the study: speech-language pathologist specialized in voice (SLP-V), SLP non specialized in voice (SLP-NV), graduate students with auditory-perceptual analysis training (GS-T), and graduate students without auditory-perceptual analysis training (GS-U). The subjects rated the OS of voice deviation and the predominant type of voice of 44 voices by visual analog scale (VAS) and the numerical scale (score "G" from GRBAS), corresponding to six speech tasks such as sustained vowel /a/ and /ɛ/, sentences, number counting, running speech, and all five previous tasks together.
Results: Sentences obtained the best interrater reliability in each group, using both VAS and GRBAS. SLP-NV group demonstrated the best interrater reliability in OS judgment in different speech tasks using VAS or GRBAS. Sustained vowel (/a/ and /ɛ/) and running speech obtained the best interrater reliability among the groups of listeners in judging the predominant vocal quality. GS-T group got the best result of interrater reliability in judging the predominant vocal quality.
Conclusion: The time of experience in the auditory-perceptual judgment of the voice, the type of training to which they were submitted, and the type of speech task influence the reliability of the auditory-perceptual evaluation of vocal quality.