[以 "Gesunde Betriebe Kinzigtal "为例评估工作场所健康促进网络--实证分析]。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Gesundheitswesen Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-02 DOI:10.1055/a-2234-7124
Verena Koopmann, Hendrike Berger, Madeleine Renyi
{"title":"[以 \"Gesunde Betriebe Kinzigtal \"为例评估工作场所健康促进网络--实证分析]。","authors":"Verena Koopmann, Hendrike Berger, Madeleine Renyi","doi":"10.1055/a-2234-7124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For years, there has been a high level of activity in creating networks in workplace health promotion (WHP). So far, there have only been a few evaluations of these network formations. The aim of this study was to evaluate networks in WHP using the example of the regional network \"Gesunde Betriebe Kinzigtal\" (Healthy Companies Kinzigtal). The network supports companies in the Kinzigtal in the implementation and realisation of WHP.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>By means of an online survey, responsible employees of the participating companies evaluated the network and the measures for WHP. The focus was on the constructs of satisfaction and benefit as well as the perception of networks in WHP.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Of the 21 companies participating in the network, 13 took part in the study, which corresponds to a response rate of 62%. The analysis showed a positive evaluation of the network activities. The companies were satisfied with the network \"Gesunde Betriebe Kinzigtal\" as well as the measures for WHP and derived a benefit from it. Furthermore, the companies perceived the network as helpful and participation in it as beneficial.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Networks provide support for the introduction and long-term implementation of WHP.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11404347/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Evaluation of Networks in Workplace Health Promotion using the Example of \\\"Gesunde Betriebe Kinzigtal\\\" - An Empirical Analysis].\",\"authors\":\"Verena Koopmann, Hendrike Berger, Madeleine Renyi\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2234-7124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For years, there has been a high level of activity in creating networks in workplace health promotion (WHP). So far, there have only been a few evaluations of these network formations. The aim of this study was to evaluate networks in WHP using the example of the regional network \\\"Gesunde Betriebe Kinzigtal\\\" (Healthy Companies Kinzigtal). The network supports companies in the Kinzigtal in the implementation and realisation of WHP.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>By means of an online survey, responsible employees of the participating companies evaluated the network and the measures for WHP. The focus was on the constructs of satisfaction and benefit as well as the perception of networks in WHP.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Of the 21 companies participating in the network, 13 took part in the study, which corresponds to a response rate of 62%. The analysis showed a positive evaluation of the network activities. The companies were satisfied with the network \\\"Gesunde Betriebe Kinzigtal\\\" as well as the measures for WHP and derived a benefit from it. Furthermore, the companies perceived the network as helpful and participation in it as beneficial.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Networks provide support for the introduction and long-term implementation of WHP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gesundheitswesen\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11404347/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gesundheitswesen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2234-7124\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2234-7124","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多年来,创建工作场所健康促进(WHP)网络的活动一直十分活跃。但迄今为止,对这些网络的评估却寥寥无几。本研究旨在以地区网络 "金齐加尔健康企业"(Gesunde Betriebe Kinzigtal)为例,对工作场所健康促进网络进行评估。该网络为金齐加尔地区的企业实施和实现 WHP 提供支持:通过在线调查,参与公司的负责员工对该网络和 WHP 措施进行了评估。结果:在参与网络的 21 家公司中,有 3 家公司的员工对网络进行了评估:结果:在参与该网络的 21 家公司中,有 13 家参加了研究,回复率为 62%。分析表明,企业对网络活动给予了积极评价。这些公司对 "Gesunde Betriebe Kinzigtal "网络以及 WHP 措施表示满意,并从中受益。此外,企业认为该网络很有帮助,参与该网络很有益处:网络为引入和长期实施 WHP 提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Evaluation of Networks in Workplace Health Promotion using the Example of "Gesunde Betriebe Kinzigtal" - An Empirical Analysis].

Background: For years, there has been a high level of activity in creating networks in workplace health promotion (WHP). So far, there have only been a few evaluations of these network formations. The aim of this study was to evaluate networks in WHP using the example of the regional network "Gesunde Betriebe Kinzigtal" (Healthy Companies Kinzigtal). The network supports companies in the Kinzigtal in the implementation and realisation of WHP.

Method: By means of an online survey, responsible employees of the participating companies evaluated the network and the measures for WHP. The focus was on the constructs of satisfaction and benefit as well as the perception of networks in WHP.

Result: Of the 21 companies participating in the network, 13 took part in the study, which corresponds to a response rate of 62%. The analysis showed a positive evaluation of the network activities. The companies were satisfied with the network "Gesunde Betriebe Kinzigtal" as well as the measures for WHP and derived a benefit from it. Furthermore, the companies perceived the network as helpful and participation in it as beneficial.

Conclusion: Networks provide support for the introduction and long-term implementation of WHP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gesundheitswesen
Gesundheitswesen PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
308
期刊介绍: The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.
期刊最新文献
[Community-based Disease Prevention and Health Promotion: Promoting Digital Health Literacy among People in Precarious Living Conditions]. [Key Topics and Activities of Local and District Health Conferences between 2013 and 2022: Results of a Non-Reactive Online Screening]. [Participation in children's hospitals: approaches to participatory formats for paediatric patients]. [On the Potential of Prevention Counselors in the Primary Care Setting: Evaluation Study of an Intervention in the State of Brandenburg (Germany)]. ["The Show Must Go on": Medical Assistants and Their Experience Managing Vaccination during the Covid-19 Pandemic].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1