学生开办的义诊可以增强医学生对自己临床技能的自信心,为实习做好准备。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Medical Education Online Pub Date : 2024-12-31 Epub Date: 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1080/10872981.2024.2348276
Venina S Kalistratova, Arina Nisanova, Lucy Z Shi
{"title":"学生开办的义诊可以增强医学生对自己临床技能的自信心,为实习做好准备。","authors":"Venina S Kalistratova, Arina Nisanova, Lucy Z Shi","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2024.2348276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Student-run free clinics (SRFCs) offer medical students a unique opportunity to develop their clinical, diagnostic, and social skills while providing care to medically underserved communities. This study aims to evaluate the value of SRFC involvement on students' self-reported confidence in various clinical domains and satisfaction with their medical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center retrospective pre-post assessment at an urban academic institution among second- to fourth-year medical students. We administered a 25-item questionnaire capturing the scope of clinic involvement and assessing self-reported confidence in multiple clinical domains following a one-year-long participation in student-run free clinics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-six students completed the survey. Participation in SRFCs significantly increased self-reported confidence in patient history-taking (<i>p</i> < 0.001), performing oral presentations (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and physical exams (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Students also reported significantly greater confidence in working with translators (<i>p</i> < 0.001) or as part of an interprofessional team (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and understanding the needs of the population served (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Students also found SRCs to significantly improve their confidence in preparedness for clerkships (<i>p</i> < 0.001). SRFC involvement can improve medical students' confidence in their clinical and interpersonal skills and enhance preparedness for clerkships and working with diverse patient groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SRFCs are a useful tool in the medical school curriculum that help bridge the gap between classroom learning and clinic and may encourage practice in medically underserved communities. SRFCs also integrate classroom material and clinical practice, although standardized evaluation metrics need to be developed. SRFCs should be incorporated as a learning experience by medical schools nationwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"29 1","pages":"2348276"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11067551/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student-run free clinics may enhance medical students' self-confidence in their clinical skills and preparedness for clerkships.\",\"authors\":\"Venina S Kalistratova, Arina Nisanova, Lucy Z Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10872981.2024.2348276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Student-run free clinics (SRFCs) offer medical students a unique opportunity to develop their clinical, diagnostic, and social skills while providing care to medically underserved communities. This study aims to evaluate the value of SRFC involvement on students' self-reported confidence in various clinical domains and satisfaction with their medical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center retrospective pre-post assessment at an urban academic institution among second- to fourth-year medical students. We administered a 25-item questionnaire capturing the scope of clinic involvement and assessing self-reported confidence in multiple clinical domains following a one-year-long participation in student-run free clinics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-six students completed the survey. Participation in SRFCs significantly increased self-reported confidence in patient history-taking (<i>p</i> < 0.001), performing oral presentations (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and physical exams (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Students also reported significantly greater confidence in working with translators (<i>p</i> < 0.001) or as part of an interprofessional team (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and understanding the needs of the population served (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Students also found SRCs to significantly improve their confidence in preparedness for clerkships (<i>p</i> < 0.001). SRFC involvement can improve medical students' confidence in their clinical and interpersonal skills and enhance preparedness for clerkships and working with diverse patient groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SRFCs are a useful tool in the medical school curriculum that help bridge the gap between classroom learning and clinic and may encourage practice in medically underserved communities. SRFCs also integrate classroom material and clinical practice, although standardized evaluation metrics need to be developed. SRFCs should be incorporated as a learning experience by medical schools nationwide.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Education Online\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"2348276\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11067551/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Education Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2024.2348276\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education Online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2024.2348276","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:学生开办的免费诊所(SRFC)为医学生提供了一个独特的机会,在为医疗服务不足的社区提供医疗服务的同时,发展他们的临床、诊断和社交技能。本研究旨在评估参与 SRFC 对学生自我报告的各临床领域自信心以及对医学教育满意度的影响:方法:我们在一家城市学术机构对二年级至四年级医学生进行了一次单中心事后回顾性评估。我们发放了一份包含 25 个项目的调查问卷,以了解学生参与义诊的范围,并评估他们在参与为期一年的学生自办义诊活动后对多个临床领域的自信心:56名学生完成了调查。结果:56 名学生完成了调查。参与义诊活动极大地提高了他们在病史采集方面的自信心(p p p p p p 结论:义诊活动是一种有用的工具,可以帮助学生更好地了解自己的病情:SRFC 是医学院课程中的一个有用工具,有助于弥合课堂学习与临床之间的差距,并可鼓励在医疗服务不足的社区开展实践。尽管需要制定标准化的评估指标,但 SRFC 也能将课堂教学与临床实践相结合。全国的医学院校都应将 SRFC 作为一种学习经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Student-run free clinics may enhance medical students' self-confidence in their clinical skills and preparedness for clerkships.

Introduction: Student-run free clinics (SRFCs) offer medical students a unique opportunity to develop their clinical, diagnostic, and social skills while providing care to medically underserved communities. This study aims to evaluate the value of SRFC involvement on students' self-reported confidence in various clinical domains and satisfaction with their medical education.

Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective pre-post assessment at an urban academic institution among second- to fourth-year medical students. We administered a 25-item questionnaire capturing the scope of clinic involvement and assessing self-reported confidence in multiple clinical domains following a one-year-long participation in student-run free clinics.

Results: Fifty-six students completed the survey. Participation in SRFCs significantly increased self-reported confidence in patient history-taking (p < 0.001), performing oral presentations (p < 0.001) and physical exams (p < 0.001). Students also reported significantly greater confidence in working with translators (p < 0.001) or as part of an interprofessional team (p < 0.001) and understanding the needs of the population served (p < 0.001). Students also found SRCs to significantly improve their confidence in preparedness for clerkships (p < 0.001). SRFC involvement can improve medical students' confidence in their clinical and interpersonal skills and enhance preparedness for clerkships and working with diverse patient groups.

Conclusion: SRFCs are a useful tool in the medical school curriculum that help bridge the gap between classroom learning and clinic and may encourage practice in medically underserved communities. SRFCs also integrate classroom material and clinical practice, although standardized evaluation metrics need to be developed. SRFCs should be incorporated as a learning experience by medical schools nationwide.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education Online
Medical Education Online EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education Online is an open access journal of health care education, publishing peer-reviewed research, perspectives, reviews, and early documentation of new ideas and trends. Medical Education Online aims to disseminate information on the education and training of physicians and other health care professionals. Manuscripts may address any aspect of health care education and training, including, but not limited to: -Basic science education -Clinical science education -Residency education -Learning theory -Problem-based learning (PBL) -Curriculum development -Research design and statistics -Measurement and evaluation -Faculty development -Informatics/web
期刊最新文献
Medical law; promotion of medicine curriculum: a letter to editor. Tips for developing a coaching program in medical education. High- and low-achieving international medical students' perceptions of the factors influencing their academic performance at Chinese universities. A Medical Education Research Library: key research topics and associated experts. Financial barriers and inequity in medical education in India: challenges to training a diverse and representative healthcare workforce.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1