正畸拔除第二前磨牙:对气道容积的影响

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.02.013
Miodrag Mladenovic, Simon Freezer, Craig Dreyer, Maurice J. Meade
{"title":"正畸拔除第二前磨牙:对气道容积的影响","authors":"Miodrag Mladenovic,&nbsp;Simon Freezer,&nbsp;Craig Dreyer,&nbsp;Maurice J. Meade","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.02.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The extraction of second premolars and associated changes in the volume of the airway have not been previously explored. This retrospective study aimed to compare the volumetric changes of the airway preorthodontic and postorthodontic treatment in relevant extraction and control samples and to identify variables that may influence the outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Cone-beam computed radiography scans of 54 patients with second premolar extraction and 59 nonextraction patients treated in a private orthodontic practice were matched for crowding. The average age for both samples was 15 years. The images were individually landmarked and measured by applying volumetric, linear, and angular parameters. The results were analyzed using repeated measures, such as variance analysis, correlation testing, and regression statistical analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was a statistically significant increase in the airway volume for both groups (<em>P</em> &lt;0.05). The difference in increase between the groups was not statistically significant. Seven variables demonstrated a collectively significant effect on changes to airway volume (<em>F</em>[7,112] = 38.48; <em>P</em> &lt;0.001; <em>r</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.701), with 70% of the variation predicted by the variables. Multiple regression analyses indicated that changes to the area of minimum constriction (B = 32.45; <em>t</em> = 11.95; <em>P</em> &lt;0.001) and changes to airway length (B = 94.75; <em>t</em> = 7.79; <em>P</em> &lt;0.001) had a statistically significant effect on airway volume.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The volume of the airway increased in both the extraction and nonextraction samples. The biggest contributors to the increase were an increase in airway length and an increase in the area of minimum constriction, which likely occurred as a result of natural growth.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889540624001124/pdfft?md5=0a4473e8e4a238902d98f179b54cfb0e&pid=1-s2.0-S0889540624001124-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The orthodontic extraction of second premolars: The influence on airway volume\",\"authors\":\"Miodrag Mladenovic,&nbsp;Simon Freezer,&nbsp;Craig Dreyer,&nbsp;Maurice J. Meade\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.02.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The extraction of second premolars and associated changes in the volume of the airway have not been previously explored. This retrospective study aimed to compare the volumetric changes of the airway preorthodontic and postorthodontic treatment in relevant extraction and control samples and to identify variables that may influence the outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Cone-beam computed radiography scans of 54 patients with second premolar extraction and 59 nonextraction patients treated in a private orthodontic practice were matched for crowding. The average age for both samples was 15 years. The images were individually landmarked and measured by applying volumetric, linear, and angular parameters. The results were analyzed using repeated measures, such as variance analysis, correlation testing, and regression statistical analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was a statistically significant increase in the airway volume for both groups (<em>P</em> &lt;0.05). The difference in increase between the groups was not statistically significant. Seven variables demonstrated a collectively significant effect on changes to airway volume (<em>F</em>[7,112] = 38.48; <em>P</em> &lt;0.001; <em>r</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.701), with 70% of the variation predicted by the variables. Multiple regression analyses indicated that changes to the area of minimum constriction (B = 32.45; <em>t</em> = 11.95; <em>P</em> &lt;0.001) and changes to airway length (B = 94.75; <em>t</em> = 7.79; <em>P</em> &lt;0.001) had a statistically significant effect on airway volume.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The volume of the airway increased in both the extraction and nonextraction samples. The biggest contributors to the increase were an increase in airway length and an increase in the area of minimum constriction, which likely occurred as a result of natural growth.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889540624001124/pdfft?md5=0a4473e8e4a238902d98f179b54cfb0e&pid=1-s2.0-S0889540624001124-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889540624001124\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889540624001124","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:以前从未探讨过第二前磨牙拔除和气道容积的相关变化。这项回顾性研究旨在比较相关拔牙样本和对照样本在正畸治疗前和正畸治疗后的气道容积变化,并找出可能影响结果的变量:在一家私人正畸诊所接受治疗的 54 名第二前磨牙拔除患者和 59 名非拔牙患者的锥形束计算机X光扫描结果进行了拥挤匹配。两个样本的平均年龄均为 15 岁。通过使用体积、线性和角度参数对图像进行单独标记和测量。结果采用方差分析、相关测试和回归统计分析等重复测量法进行分析:结果:两组患者的气道容积均有统计学意义上的显著增加(P 2 = 0.701),其中 70% 的变化是由变量预测的。多元回归分析表明,最小收缩面积的变化(B = 32.45;t = 11.95;P 结论:两组患者的气道容积均有增加:抽取样本和非抽取样本的气道容积都有所增加。增加的最大原因是气道长度的增加和最小收缩面积的增加,这可能是自然生长的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The orthodontic extraction of second premolars: The influence on airway volume

Introduction

The extraction of second premolars and associated changes in the volume of the airway have not been previously explored. This retrospective study aimed to compare the volumetric changes of the airway preorthodontic and postorthodontic treatment in relevant extraction and control samples and to identify variables that may influence the outcome.

Methods

Cone-beam computed radiography scans of 54 patients with second premolar extraction and 59 nonextraction patients treated in a private orthodontic practice were matched for crowding. The average age for both samples was 15 years. The images were individually landmarked and measured by applying volumetric, linear, and angular parameters. The results were analyzed using repeated measures, such as variance analysis, correlation testing, and regression statistical analyses.

Results

There was a statistically significant increase in the airway volume for both groups (P <0.05). The difference in increase between the groups was not statistically significant. Seven variables demonstrated a collectively significant effect on changes to airway volume (F[7,112] = 38.48; P <0.001; r2 = 0.701), with 70% of the variation predicted by the variables. Multiple regression analyses indicated that changes to the area of minimum constriction (B = 32.45; t = 11.95; P <0.001) and changes to airway length (B = 94.75; t = 7.79; P <0.001) had a statistically significant effect on airway volume.

Conclusions

The volume of the airway increased in both the extraction and nonextraction samples. The biggest contributors to the increase were an increase in airway length and an increase in the area of minimum constriction, which likely occurred as a result of natural growth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
432
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Published for more than 100 years, the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics remains the leading orthodontic resource. It is the official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, the American Board of Orthodontics, and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Orthodontics. Each month its readers have access to original peer-reviewed articles that examine all phases of orthodontic treatment. Illustrated throughout, the publication includes tables, color photographs, and statistical data. Coverage includes successful diagnostic procedures, imaging techniques, bracket and archwire materials, extraction and impaction concerns, orthognathic surgery, TMJ disorders, removable appliances, and adult therapy.
期刊最新文献
Mesiodistal tip expression of mandibular anterior teeth in patients with mandibular incisor extraction treated with Invisalign aligners. Directly printed aligner therapy: A 12-month evaluation of application and effectiveness. The periodontal ligament-periosteum sandwich hypothesis: A thought experiment on fenestrations and dehiscences. Comparison of microbial adhesion and biofilm formation on different orthodontic aligners. Evaluating anchorage and torque control in adolescent patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion among 3 appliances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1