对使用弹性材料的全口义齿使用者的咀嚼功能、满意度和生活质量进行评估:系统回顾

The International journal of prosthodontics Pub Date : 2024-04-22 Epub Date: 2022-12-06 DOI:10.11607/ijp.8130
Jeferson Batista Santiago, Rafaella de Souza Leão, Eduardo Piza Pellizzer, Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito Vasconcelos, Sandra Lúcia Dantas de Moraes
{"title":"对使用弹性材料的全口义齿使用者的咀嚼功能、满意度和生活质量进行评估:系统回顾","authors":"Jeferson Batista Santiago, Rafaella de Souza Leão, Eduardo Piza Pellizzer, Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito Vasconcelos, Sandra Lúcia Dantas de Moraes","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate whether complete dentures (CDs) relined with long-term resilient liners (LTRLs) favor better masticatory function, satisfaction, and quality of life among completely edentulous patients compared to conventional CDs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist and was registered in PROSPERO (the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; CRD42021258700). The population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) purpose was to determine whether CDs relined with LTRLs favor better masticatory function, satisfaction, and quality of life among completely edentulous patients when compared to CDs. Searches were performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Lilacs, BBO, and OpenGrey databases. Manual searches were also performed to identify additional primary studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 3,953 articles were found. After removing duplicates, reading the articles, and applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 15 articles were selected for qualitative analysis, totaling 422 patients with follow-up periods ranging from 1 week to 3 years. Among these, 8 studies assessed masticatory function using different methods, 2 assessed satisfaction, 1 assessed quality of life, and 4 assessed more than one outcome. Through qualitative analysis, LTRLs showed satisfactory results in most studies when compared to CDs in relation to masticatory function, satisfaction, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LTRLs favor better masticatory function, satisfaction, and quality of life among completely edentulous patients compared to CDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"37 2","pages":"210-220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Masticatory Function, Satisfaction, and Quality of Life Among Users of Complete Dentures Relined with Resilient Materials: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Jeferson Batista Santiago, Rafaella de Souza Leão, Eduardo Piza Pellizzer, Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito Vasconcelos, Sandra Lúcia Dantas de Moraes\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/ijp.8130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate whether complete dentures (CDs) relined with long-term resilient liners (LTRLs) favor better masticatory function, satisfaction, and quality of life among completely edentulous patients compared to conventional CDs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist and was registered in PROSPERO (the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; CRD42021258700). The population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) purpose was to determine whether CDs relined with LTRLs favor better masticatory function, satisfaction, and quality of life among completely edentulous patients when compared to CDs. Searches were performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Lilacs, BBO, and OpenGrey databases. Manual searches were also performed to identify additional primary studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 3,953 articles were found. After removing duplicates, reading the articles, and applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 15 articles were selected for qualitative analysis, totaling 422 patients with follow-up periods ranging from 1 week to 3 years. Among these, 8 studies assessed masticatory function using different methods, 2 assessed satisfaction, 1 assessed quality of life, and 4 assessed more than one outcome. Through qualitative analysis, LTRLs showed satisfactory results in most studies when compared to CDs in relation to masticatory function, satisfaction, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LTRLs favor better masticatory function, satisfaction, and quality of life among completely edentulous patients compared to CDs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"volume\":\"37 2\",\"pages\":\"210-220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/12/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估与传统全口义齿(CD)相比,使用长期弹性衬垫(LTRL)重衬全口义齿(CD)是否有利于提高完全无牙颌患者的咀嚼功能、满意度和生活质量:本综述遵循系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)清单,并在 PROSPERO(系统综述国际前瞻性注册;CRD42021258700)上注册。该研究的研究对象、干预、比较和结果(PICO)旨在确定与 CDs 相比,用 LTRLs 对 CDs 进行再衬垫是否能改善完全无牙颌患者的咀嚼功能、满意度和生活质量。在 PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus、Lilacs、BBO 和 OpenGrey 数据库中进行了检索。此外,还进行了人工检索以确定其他主要研究:结果:总共找到 3953 篇文章。在删除重复文章、阅读文章并应用纳入和排除标准后,选择了 15 篇文章进行定性分析,共计 422 名患者,随访时间从 1 周到 3 年不等。其中,8 项研究使用不同的方法评估了咀嚼功能,2 项研究评估了满意度,1 项研究评估了生活质量,4 项研究评估了一种以上的结果。通过定性分析,在咀嚼功能、满意度和生活质量方面,LTRL 与 CD 相比,大多数研究都显示出令人满意的结果:结论:与CD相比,LTRL有利于提高完全无牙颌患者的咀嚼功能、满意度和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Masticatory Function, Satisfaction, and Quality of Life Among Users of Complete Dentures Relined with Resilient Materials: A Systematic Review.

Purpose: To evaluate whether complete dentures (CDs) relined with long-term resilient liners (LTRLs) favor better masticatory function, satisfaction, and quality of life among completely edentulous patients compared to conventional CDs.

Materials and methods: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist and was registered in PROSPERO (the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; CRD42021258700). The population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) purpose was to determine whether CDs relined with LTRLs favor better masticatory function, satisfaction, and quality of life among completely edentulous patients when compared to CDs. Searches were performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Lilacs, BBO, and OpenGrey databases. Manual searches were also performed to identify additional primary studies.

Results: Overall, 3,953 articles were found. After removing duplicates, reading the articles, and applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 15 articles were selected for qualitative analysis, totaling 422 patients with follow-up periods ranging from 1 week to 3 years. Among these, 8 studies assessed masticatory function using different methods, 2 assessed satisfaction, 1 assessed quality of life, and 4 assessed more than one outcome. Through qualitative analysis, LTRLs showed satisfactory results in most studies when compared to CDs in relation to masticatory function, satisfaction, and quality of life.

Conclusions: LTRLs favor better masticatory function, satisfaction, and quality of life among completely edentulous patients compared to CDs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital Workflow for Rehabilitation of Severely Discolored Teeth Due to Red Staining from Endodontic Material. Influence of Different Cements on Bonding Efficiency Between Implant Abutment and Standard Restoration. Thirty-Year Clinical Performance of Double-Crown Retained Removable Partial Dentures - A Practice-Based Retrospective Study. Evaluation of the Bond Strengths Between Dental Ceramics and Co-Cr Frameworks Made with Digital and Conventional Techniques. 3D-Printed Permanent Resin Crowns on Pre-Molar and Molar Teeth; Two-Year Results of a Prospective Clinical Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1