一项前瞻性队列研究评估了 TRISS 和 TRISS-SpO2 评分系统,用于评估印度创伤研究参与者的死亡风险。

Rishwanth Vetri, Dhanabalan Piramanayagam, Preethy Ravi
{"title":"一项前瞻性队列研究评估了 TRISS 和 TRISS-SpO2 评分系统,用于评估印度创伤研究参与者的死亡风险。","authors":"Rishwanth Vetri, Dhanabalan Piramanayagam, Preethy Ravi","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_38_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, trauma cases have significant morbidity and mortality. Hence, various scoring systems have been designed to improve the prognosis in trauma cases. Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) is one of the widely used models to predict mortality; however, it has certain limitation. We have aimed to evaluate the survival prediction of new model TRISS-oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) and to compare with original TRISS score in trauma study participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective cohort study conducted on 380 trauma study participants admitted to the surgery department from January 20, 2021, to November 28, 2021. The proposed model includes TRISS-SpO<sub>2</sub> which replaces pulse SpO<sub>2</sub> instead of revised trauma score in the original TRISS score. Probability of survival (Ps) was calculated for both models using coefficients derived from Walker-Duncan regression analysis analyzed from the Major Trauma Outcome Study. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to predict model performance and the accuracy was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mortality rate in the present study was 30 (7.9%). The predictive accuracy of original TRISS score which calculated Ps based on respiratory rate was 97.11%, and for the proposed model of TRISS score which calculated Ps based on SpO<sub>2</sub> was found 97.11%, and thus there is no significant difference in the performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The new proposed model TRISS-SpO<sub>2</sub> showed a good accuracy which is similar to original TRISS score. However, the new tool TRISS-SpO<sub>2</sub> might be easier to use for robust performance in the clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"14 1","pages":"21-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11073638/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A prospective cohort study evaluating the TRISS and TRISS-SpO<sub>2</sub> scoring systems for assessing mortality risk in trauma study participants in India.\",\"authors\":\"Rishwanth Vetri, Dhanabalan Piramanayagam, Preethy Ravi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_38_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, trauma cases have significant morbidity and mortality. Hence, various scoring systems have been designed to improve the prognosis in trauma cases. Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) is one of the widely used models to predict mortality; however, it has certain limitation. We have aimed to evaluate the survival prediction of new model TRISS-oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) and to compare with original TRISS score in trauma study participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective cohort study conducted on 380 trauma study participants admitted to the surgery department from January 20, 2021, to November 28, 2021. The proposed model includes TRISS-SpO<sub>2</sub> which replaces pulse SpO<sub>2</sub> instead of revised trauma score in the original TRISS score. Probability of survival (Ps) was calculated for both models using coefficients derived from Walker-Duncan regression analysis analyzed from the Major Trauma Outcome Study. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to predict model performance and the accuracy was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mortality rate in the present study was 30 (7.9%). The predictive accuracy of original TRISS score which calculated Ps based on respiratory rate was 97.11%, and for the proposed model of TRISS score which calculated Ps based on SpO<sub>2</sub> was found 97.11%, and thus there is no significant difference in the performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The new proposed model TRISS-SpO<sub>2</sub> showed a good accuracy which is similar to original TRISS score. However, the new tool TRISS-SpO<sub>2</sub> might be easier to use for robust performance in the clinical setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"21-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11073638/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_38_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_38_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在全球范围内,创伤病例的发病率和死亡率都很高。因此,人们设计了各种评分系统来改善创伤病例的预后。创伤和损伤严重程度评分(Trauma and Injury Severity Score,TRISS)是广泛使用的死亡率预测模型之一,但它有一定的局限性。我们的目的是评估新模型 TRISS-血氧饱和度(SpO2)的生存预测能力,并与创伤研究参与者的原始 TRISS 评分进行比较:这是一项前瞻性队列研究,研究对象是 2021 年 1 月 20 日至 2021 年 11 月 28 日期间入住外科的 380 名创伤研究参与者。所提议的模型包括 TRISS-SpO2,它取代了原始 TRISS 评分中的脉搏 SpO2 而不是修订后的创伤评分。两个模型的存活概率(Ps)都是使用从重大创伤结果研究(Major Trauma Outcome Study)中分析得出的沃克-邓肯(Walker-Duncan)回归分析系数计算得出的。使用接收者操作特征曲线分析预测模型的性能,并计算其准确性:本研究中的死亡率为 30(7.9%)。根据呼吸频率计算Ps的原始TRISS评分的预测准确率为97.11%,而根据SpO2计算Ps的TRISS评分模型的预测准确率为97.11%,因此两者在性能上没有显著差异:结论:新提出的 TRISS-SpO2 模型显示出与原始 TRISS 评分相似的良好准确性。然而,新的 TRISS-SpO2 工具可能更易于在临床环境中使用,以获得更好的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A prospective cohort study evaluating the TRISS and TRISS-SpO2 scoring systems for assessing mortality risk in trauma study participants in India.

Background: Globally, trauma cases have significant morbidity and mortality. Hence, various scoring systems have been designed to improve the prognosis in trauma cases. Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) is one of the widely used models to predict mortality; however, it has certain limitation. We have aimed to evaluate the survival prediction of new model TRISS-oxygen saturation (SpO2) and to compare with original TRISS score in trauma study participants.

Methods: This was a prospective cohort study conducted on 380 trauma study participants admitted to the surgery department from January 20, 2021, to November 28, 2021. The proposed model includes TRISS-SpO2 which replaces pulse SpO2 instead of revised trauma score in the original TRISS score. Probability of survival (Ps) was calculated for both models using coefficients derived from Walker-Duncan regression analysis analyzed from the Major Trauma Outcome Study. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to predict model performance and the accuracy was calculated.

Results: The mortality rate in the present study was 30 (7.9%). The predictive accuracy of original TRISS score which calculated Ps based on respiratory rate was 97.11%, and for the proposed model of TRISS score which calculated Ps based on SpO2 was found 97.11%, and thus there is no significant difference in the performance.

Conclusions: The new proposed model TRISS-SpO2 showed a good accuracy which is similar to original TRISS score. However, the new tool TRISS-SpO2 might be easier to use for robust performance in the clinical setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: IJCIIS encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the field of Critical Illness and Injury Science across the world thus promoting translational research by striking a synergy between basic science, clinical medicine and public health. The Journal intends to bring together scientists and academicians in the emergency intensive care and promote translational synergy between Laboratory Science, Clinical Medicine and Public Health. The Journal invites Original Articles, Clinical Investigations, Epidemiological Analysis, Data Protocols, Case Reports, Clinical Photographs, review articles and special commentaries. Students, Residents, Academicians, Public Health experts and scientists are all encouraged to be a part of this initiative by contributing, reviewing and promoting scientific works and science.
期刊最新文献
Effect of temperature and duration of cardiopulmonary bypass on cerebral saturation. Prospective observational study to measure the incidence of chest pain and its association with perioperative factors among parturients undergoing lower segment cesarean section with subarachnoid blocks. Response to: "Before attributing basilar artery aneurysm and pericardial tamponade to leptospirosis, alternative causes must be ruled out". Assessment of quality of life in follow-up patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: A prospective, observational study from a tertiary care center. Association of obesity and mortality in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1