临床数据分析的集中模式和联合模式。

IF 7 Q1 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-122220-115746
Ruowang Li, Joseph D Romano, Yong Chen, Jason H Moore
{"title":"临床数据分析的集中模式和联合模式。","authors":"Ruowang Li, Joseph D Romano, Yong Chen, Jason H Moore","doi":"10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-122220-115746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The progress of precision medicine research hinges on the gathering and analysis of extensive and diverse clinical datasets. With the continued expansion of modalities, scales, and sources of clinical datasets, it becomes imperative to devise methods for aggregating information from these varied sources to achieve a comprehensive understanding of diseases. In this review, we describe two important approaches for the analysis of diverse clinical datasets, namely the centralized model and federated model. We compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses inherent in each model and present recent progress in methodologies and their associated challenges. Finally, we present an outlook on the opportunities that both models hold for the future analysis of clinical data.</p>","PeriodicalId":29775,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science","volume":" ","pages":"179-199"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571052/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Centralized and Federated Models for the Analysis of Clinical Data.\",\"authors\":\"Ruowang Li, Joseph D Romano, Yong Chen, Jason H Moore\",\"doi\":\"10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-122220-115746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The progress of precision medicine research hinges on the gathering and analysis of extensive and diverse clinical datasets. With the continued expansion of modalities, scales, and sources of clinical datasets, it becomes imperative to devise methods for aggregating information from these varied sources to achieve a comprehensive understanding of diseases. In this review, we describe two important approaches for the analysis of diverse clinical datasets, namely the centralized model and federated model. We compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses inherent in each model and present recent progress in methodologies and their associated challenges. Finally, we present an outlook on the opportunities that both models hold for the future analysis of clinical data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"179-199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571052/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-122220-115746\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-122220-115746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

精准医学研究的进展取决于对广泛而多样的临床数据集的收集和分析。随着临床数据集的模式、规模和来源的不断扩大,当务之急是设计出从这些不同来源汇总信息的方法,以实现对疾病的全面了解。在这篇综述中,我们介绍了分析多样化临床数据集的两种重要方法,即集中模式和联合模式。我们比较和对比了每种模式固有的优缺点,并介绍了方法论的最新进展及其相关挑战。最后,我们展望了这两种模式为未来临床数据分析带来的机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Centralized and Federated Models for the Analysis of Clinical Data.

The progress of precision medicine research hinges on the gathering and analysis of extensive and diverse clinical datasets. With the continued expansion of modalities, scales, and sources of clinical datasets, it becomes imperative to devise methods for aggregating information from these varied sources to achieve a comprehensive understanding of diseases. In this review, we describe two important approaches for the analysis of diverse clinical datasets, namely the centralized model and federated model. We compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses inherent in each model and present recent progress in methodologies and their associated challenges. Finally, we present an outlook on the opportunities that both models hold for the future analysis of clinical data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science provides comprehensive expert reviews in biomedical data science, focusing on advanced methods to store, retrieve, analyze, and organize biomedical data and knowledge. The scope of the journal encompasses informatics, computational, artificial intelligence (AI), and statistical approaches to biomedical data, including the sub-fields of bioinformatics, computational biology, biomedical informatics, clinical and clinical research informatics, biostatistics, and imaging informatics. The mission of the journal is to identify both emerging and established areas of biomedical data science, and the leaders in these fields.
期刊最新文献
Spatial Transcriptomics Brings New Challenges and Opportunities for Trajectory Inference. The Evolutionary Interplay of Somatic and Germline Mutation Rates. Centralized and Federated Models for the Analysis of Clinical Data. Mapping the Human Cell Surface Interactome: A Key to Decode Cell-to-Cell Communication. Data Science Methods for Real-World Evidence Generation in Real-World Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1