全科医学中的姑息关怀干预研究:对影响研究开展的因素的叙述性回顾。

4区 医学 Q2 Nursing Annals of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-10 DOI:10.21037/apm-23-587
Matthew Grant, Maike van der Waal, Tania Pastrana, Joel Rhee, Saskia Teunissen
{"title":"全科医学中的姑息关怀干预研究:对影响研究开展的因素的叙述性回顾。","authors":"Matthew Grant, Maike van der Waal, Tania Pastrana, Joel Rhee, Saskia Teunissen","doi":"10.21037/apm-23-587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The majority of palliative care provision occurs in general practice, yet only 9% of palliative care clinical trials were conducted in this setting. Evidence from hospital and specialist settings is not readily transferable to general practice, as the population, context and care processes are vastly different. Conducting interventional palliative care research in general practice settings is subject to many challenges and barriers. This narrative review aims to describe the factors influencing the conduct of interventional research in general practice settings for patients with palliative care needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative review was performed to identify factors affecting the conduct of palliative care interventional studies in general practice. A literature search of MEDLINE was conducted on 26 September 2023, and data were synthesised utilising a narrative approach.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>Sixteen articles were identified. Five thematic groupings were identified from the literature that affected the interventions: factors related to health care professionals (HCPs), patients and carers, general practices, health systems, and research design. HCPs and practices were focused on providing clinical care and struggled to incorporate research into their workload. Staff and patients often had negative perceptions in palliative care combined with limited research experience, often resulting in unwillingness to engage in interventions and gatekeeping. Engaging with general practice staff to design, participate and champion research were key facilitators of successful interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Palliative care interventions in general practice are invariably complex and challenging, yet acutely needed to address the care needs of patients in the community setting. Working together with patients, carers and clinicians to design and implement interventions appropriate for general practice settings is fundamental to their success.</p>","PeriodicalId":7956,"journal":{"name":"Annals of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"869-879"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Palliative care interventional research in general practice: a narrative review of factors affecting research conduct.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Grant, Maike van der Waal, Tania Pastrana, Joel Rhee, Saskia Teunissen\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/apm-23-587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The majority of palliative care provision occurs in general practice, yet only 9% of palliative care clinical trials were conducted in this setting. Evidence from hospital and specialist settings is not readily transferable to general practice, as the population, context and care processes are vastly different. Conducting interventional palliative care research in general practice settings is subject to many challenges and barriers. This narrative review aims to describe the factors influencing the conduct of interventional research in general practice settings for patients with palliative care needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative review was performed to identify factors affecting the conduct of palliative care interventional studies in general practice. A literature search of MEDLINE was conducted on 26 September 2023, and data were synthesised utilising a narrative approach.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>Sixteen articles were identified. Five thematic groupings were identified from the literature that affected the interventions: factors related to health care professionals (HCPs), patients and carers, general practices, health systems, and research design. HCPs and practices were focused on providing clinical care and struggled to incorporate research into their workload. Staff and patients often had negative perceptions in palliative care combined with limited research experience, often resulting in unwillingness to engage in interventions and gatekeeping. Engaging with general practice staff to design, participate and champion research were key facilitators of successful interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Palliative care interventions in general practice are invariably complex and challenging, yet acutely needed to address the care needs of patients in the community setting. Working together with patients, carers and clinicians to design and implement interventions appropriate for general practice settings is fundamental to their success.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of palliative medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"869-879\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of palliative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-23-587\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-23-587","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:大部分姑息关怀服务都是在全科医疗机构提供的,但只有 9% 的姑息关怀临床试验是在全科医疗机构进行的。来自医院和专科机构的证据并不能轻易移植到全科实践中,因为人群、环境和护理流程都大不相同。在全科医疗机构开展介入性姑息关怀研究面临许多挑战和障碍。本叙事性综述旨在描述影响在全科医疗机构针对有姑息关怀需求的患者开展干预性研究的因素:方法:我们进行了叙述性综述,以确定影响在全科实践中开展姑息关怀干预研究的因素。2023年9月26日,对MEDLINE进行了文献检索,并采用叙事方法对数据进行了综合:确定了 16 篇文章。从影响干预措施的文献中确定了五个主题分组:与医护专业人员(HCPs)、患者和护理人员、全科实践、卫生系统和研究设计相关的因素。医护人员和医疗机构的工作重点是提供临床护理,很难将研究纳入他们的工作量。工作人员和患者通常对姑息关怀有负面看法,加上研究经验有限,往往导致他们不愿参与干预和把关。让全科医生参与设计、参与和支持研究是成功干预的关键因素:全科实践中的姑息关怀干预措施无一例外地具有复杂性和挑战性,但却急需解决社区环境中患者的关怀需求。与患者、照护者和临床医生合作,设计并实施适合全科医疗环境的干预措施,是干预措施取得成功的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Palliative care interventional research in general practice: a narrative review of factors affecting research conduct.

Background and objective: The majority of palliative care provision occurs in general practice, yet only 9% of palliative care clinical trials were conducted in this setting. Evidence from hospital and specialist settings is not readily transferable to general practice, as the population, context and care processes are vastly different. Conducting interventional palliative care research in general practice settings is subject to many challenges and barriers. This narrative review aims to describe the factors influencing the conduct of interventional research in general practice settings for patients with palliative care needs.

Methods: A narrative review was performed to identify factors affecting the conduct of palliative care interventional studies in general practice. A literature search of MEDLINE was conducted on 26 September 2023, and data were synthesised utilising a narrative approach.

Key content and findings: Sixteen articles were identified. Five thematic groupings were identified from the literature that affected the interventions: factors related to health care professionals (HCPs), patients and carers, general practices, health systems, and research design. HCPs and practices were focused on providing clinical care and struggled to incorporate research into their workload. Staff and patients often had negative perceptions in palliative care combined with limited research experience, often resulting in unwillingness to engage in interventions and gatekeeping. Engaging with general practice staff to design, participate and champion research were key facilitators of successful interventions.

Conclusions: Palliative care interventions in general practice are invariably complex and challenging, yet acutely needed to address the care needs of patients in the community setting. Working together with patients, carers and clinicians to design and implement interventions appropriate for general practice settings is fundamental to their success.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of palliative medicine
Annals of palliative medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
231
期刊介绍: Annals of Palliative Medicine (Ann Palliat Med; Print ISSN 2224-5820; Online ISSN 2224-5839) is an open access, international, peer-reviewed journal published quarterly with both online and printed copies since 2012. The aim of the journal is to provide up-to-date and cutting-edge information and professional support for health care providers in palliative medicine disciplines to improve the quality of life for patients and their families and caregivers.
期刊最新文献
A narrative review of the challenges and impact of breast cancer treatment in older adults beyond cancer diagnosis. Palliative care and hepatobiliary malignancies: say no to late referral. Stepped palliative care: considerations for equitable implementation. Breast cancer survivorship care: a narrative review of challenges and future directions. Surveillance of patients after palliative radiation, how to make it feasible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1