呼出一氧化氮参考方程--需要什么?

IF 3.7 4区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Journal of breath research Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1088/1752-7163/ad4aba
Marieann Högman
{"title":"呼出一氧化氮参考方程--需要什么?","authors":"Marieann Högman","doi":"10.1088/1752-7163/ad4aba","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Standardisation is the road to improvement! If we all measure exhaled nitric oxide (NO) the same way, we will be successful in having data to make reference questions. Many research groups have published their reference equation, but most differ considerably. About 25 years ago, using the flow of 50 ml s<sup>-1</sup>was recommended and not using a nose clip. When collecting data worldwide, we still see publications that do not indicate what flow was used and that nose clip was utilised. Three things are needed: the analysing method, a flow recording and a filled-in nitric oxide questionnaire. The analysing method is because the techniques have different sensitivity, response times and calibration. The flow of 50 ml s<sup>-1</sup>is on the steep part of the NO output curve; therefore, we need to record the flow to analyse repeated measurements or compare results. The NO questionnaire controls individual factors that may influence the NO measurements, i.e. food intake, smoking and upper airway infection. An important tool in following old and new disease treatments, at home or in health care, is exhaled biomarkers. If we follow the standardisation we have agreed upon, we will be able to have data to say what a high or a low exhaled NO value is.</p>","PeriodicalId":15306,"journal":{"name":"Journal of breath research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reference equations for exhaled nitric oxide-what is needed?\",\"authors\":\"Marieann Högman\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1752-7163/ad4aba\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Standardisation is the road to improvement! If we all measure exhaled nitric oxide (NO) the same way, we will be successful in having data to make reference questions. Many research groups have published their reference equation, but most differ considerably. About 25 years ago, using the flow of 50 ml s<sup>-1</sup>was recommended and not using a nose clip. When collecting data worldwide, we still see publications that do not indicate what flow was used and that nose clip was utilised. Three things are needed: the analysing method, a flow recording and a filled-in nitric oxide questionnaire. The analysing method is because the techniques have different sensitivity, response times and calibration. The flow of 50 ml s<sup>-1</sup>is on the steep part of the NO output curve; therefore, we need to record the flow to analyse repeated measurements or compare results. The NO questionnaire controls individual factors that may influence the NO measurements, i.e. food intake, smoking and upper airway infection. An important tool in following old and new disease treatments, at home or in health care, is exhaled biomarkers. If we follow the standardisation we have agreed upon, we will be able to have data to say what a high or a low exhaled NO value is.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of breath research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of breath research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/ad4aba\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of breath research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/ad4aba","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

标准化是改进之路!如果我们都用同样的方法测量呼出的一氧化氮(NO),我们就能成功地获得数据来提出参考问题。许多研究小组都公布了他们的参考方程,但大多数差异很大。大约 25 年前,我们推荐使用 50 mL s-1 的流量,并且不使用鼻夹。在全球范围内收集数据时,我们仍能看到一些出版物没有说明使用的流量和鼻夹。我们需要三样东西:分析方法、流量记录和填写的一氧化氮问卷。分析方法是因为不同技术有不同的灵敏度、响应时间和校准。50 mL s-1 的流量位于一氧化氮输出曲线的陡峭部分;因此,我们需要记录流量,以便分析重复测量或比较结果。NO 问卷可控制可能影响 NO 测量的个体因素,即食物摄入量、吸烟和上呼吸道感染。呼出的生物标记物是在家庭或医疗机构中跟踪新旧疾病治疗的重要工具。如果我们遵循已达成共识的标准化方法,我们就能获得数据来说明呼出的 NO 值是高还是低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reference equations for exhaled nitric oxide-what is needed?

Standardisation is the road to improvement! If we all measure exhaled nitric oxide (NO) the same way, we will be successful in having data to make reference questions. Many research groups have published their reference equation, but most differ considerably. About 25 years ago, using the flow of 50 ml s-1was recommended and not using a nose clip. When collecting data worldwide, we still see publications that do not indicate what flow was used and that nose clip was utilised. Three things are needed: the analysing method, a flow recording and a filled-in nitric oxide questionnaire. The analysing method is because the techniques have different sensitivity, response times and calibration. The flow of 50 ml s-1is on the steep part of the NO output curve; therefore, we need to record the flow to analyse repeated measurements or compare results. The NO questionnaire controls individual factors that may influence the NO measurements, i.e. food intake, smoking and upper airway infection. An important tool in following old and new disease treatments, at home or in health care, is exhaled biomarkers. If we follow the standardisation we have agreed upon, we will be able to have data to say what a high or a low exhaled NO value is.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of breath research
Journal of breath research BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
21.10%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Breath Research is dedicated to all aspects of scientific breath research. The traditional focus is on analysis of volatile compounds and aerosols in exhaled breath for the investigation of exogenous exposures, metabolism, toxicology, health status and the diagnosis of disease and breath odours. The journal also welcomes other breath-related topics. Typical areas of interest include: Big laboratory instrumentation: describing new state-of-the-art analytical instrumentation capable of performing high-resolution discovery and targeted breath research; exploiting complex technologies drawn from other areas of biochemistry and genetics for breath research. Engineering solutions: developing new breath sampling technologies for condensate and aerosols, for chemical and optical sensors, for extraction and sample preparation methods, for automation and standardization, and for multiplex analyses to preserve the breath matrix and facilitating analytical throughput. Measure exhaled constituents (e.g. CO2, acetone, isoprene) as markers of human presence or mitigate such contaminants in enclosed environments. Human and animal in vivo studies: decoding the ''breath exposome'', implementing exposure and intervention studies, performing cross-sectional and case-control research, assaying immune and inflammatory response, and testing mammalian host response to infections and exogenous exposures to develop information directly applicable to systems biology. Studying inhalation toxicology; inhaled breath as a source of internal dose; resultant blood, breath and urinary biomarkers linked to inhalation pathway. Cellular and molecular level in vitro studies. Clinical, pharmacological and forensic applications. Mathematical, statistical and graphical data interpretation.
期刊最新文献
Correlations between propofol concentration in exhaled breath and BIS in patients undergoing thyroid surgery. Volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath, blood, and urine detected in patients with thyroid carcinoma using gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry-a pilot study. Effectiveness of a combination of laccase and green coffee extract on oral malodor: a comparative, randomized, controlled, evaluator-blind, parallel-group trial. Halitosis in oral lichen planus patients. Validation of a sensor system for the measurement of breath ammonia using selected-ion flow-tube mass spectrometry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1