克罗恩病患者在使用硫嘌呤和甲氨蝶呤时临床失败风险的差异:一项基于韩国全国人口的研究。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-05-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562848241248321
Yu Kyung Jun, Eunjeong Ji, Hye Ran Yang, Yonghoon Choi, Cheol Min Shin, Young Soo Park, Nayoung Kim, Dong Ho Lee, Hyuk Yoon
{"title":"克罗恩病患者在使用硫嘌呤和甲氨蝶呤时临床失败风险的差异:一项基于韩国全国人口的研究。","authors":"Yu Kyung Jun, Eunjeong Ji, Hye Ran Yang, Yonghoon Choi, Cheol Min Shin, Young Soo Park, Nayoung Kim, Dong Ho Lee, Hyuk Yoon","doi":"10.1177/17562848241248321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although immunomodulators are widely prescribed in patients with Crohn's disease (CD), it is unclear whether there is a difference in treatment outcomes between thiopurines and methotrexate (MTX).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the risk of clinical failure between thiopurines and MTX in bio-naïve patients with CD.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Nationwide, population-based study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used claims data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to evaluate the risk of clinical failure in bio-naïve patients with CD treated with thiopurine (thiopurine group) or MTX (MTX group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 10,296 adult and pediatric patients with CD [9912 (96.3%) and 384 (3.7%) in the thiopurine and MTX groups, respectively] were included. The odds ratios (ORs) of failure to induce remission were significantly higher in the MTX group than in the thiopurine group [adjusted OR (aOR), 1.115; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.045-1.190; <i>p</i> = 0.001]. However, the opposite result was observed only in patients without concomitant steroid use: the MTX group had a lower risk of induction failure than the thiopurine group (aOR, 0.740; 95% CI, 0.673-0.813; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The risk of overall maintenance failure was higher in the MTX group than in the thiopurine group [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.117; 95% CI, 1.047-1.191; <i>p</i> = 0.001]. The risk of overall maintenance failure was higher in the standard-dose MTX group than in the low-dose MTX group (aHR, 1.296; 95% CI, 1.134-1.480; <i>p</i> < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the risk of maintenance failure according to the administration route of MTX.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thiopurine is more effective than MTX in inducing and maintaining remission in bio-naïve patients with CD; however, the concomitant use of steroids influences inducing remission.</p>","PeriodicalId":48770,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11089848/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in the risk of clinical failure between thiopurine and methotrexate in bio-naïve patients with Crohn's disease: a Korean nationwide population-based study.\",\"authors\":\"Yu Kyung Jun, Eunjeong Ji, Hye Ran Yang, Yonghoon Choi, Cheol Min Shin, Young Soo Park, Nayoung Kim, Dong Ho Lee, Hyuk Yoon\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17562848241248321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although immunomodulators are widely prescribed in patients with Crohn's disease (CD), it is unclear whether there is a difference in treatment outcomes between thiopurines and methotrexate (MTX).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the risk of clinical failure between thiopurines and MTX in bio-naïve patients with CD.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Nationwide, population-based study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used claims data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to evaluate the risk of clinical failure in bio-naïve patients with CD treated with thiopurine (thiopurine group) or MTX (MTX group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 10,296 adult and pediatric patients with CD [9912 (96.3%) and 384 (3.7%) in the thiopurine and MTX groups, respectively] were included. The odds ratios (ORs) of failure to induce remission were significantly higher in the MTX group than in the thiopurine group [adjusted OR (aOR), 1.115; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.045-1.190; <i>p</i> = 0.001]. However, the opposite result was observed only in patients without concomitant steroid use: the MTX group had a lower risk of induction failure than the thiopurine group (aOR, 0.740; 95% CI, 0.673-0.813; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The risk of overall maintenance failure was higher in the MTX group than in the thiopurine group [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.117; 95% CI, 1.047-1.191; <i>p</i> = 0.001]. The risk of overall maintenance failure was higher in the standard-dose MTX group than in the low-dose MTX group (aHR, 1.296; 95% CI, 1.134-1.480; <i>p</i> < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the risk of maintenance failure according to the administration route of MTX.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thiopurine is more effective than MTX in inducing and maintaining remission in bio-naïve patients with CD; however, the concomitant use of steroids influences inducing remission.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11089848/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848241248321\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848241248321","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管克罗恩病(CD)患者广泛使用免疫调节剂,但目前尚不清楚硫嘌呤类药物和甲氨蝶呤(MTX)的治疗效果是否存在差异:目的:比较硫嘌呤类药物和MTX对生物无效的克罗恩病患者临床治疗失败的风险:设计:全国性、基于人群的研究:我们使用了韩国国民健康保险服务的理赔数据。在对治疗进行反概率加权后,采用逻辑回归和 Cox 比例危险分析来评估接受硫嘌呤(硫嘌呤组)或 MTX(MTX 组)治疗的 CD 患者临床治疗失败的风险:共纳入10296名成人和儿童CD患者[硫嘌呤组和MTX组分别为9912人(96.3%)和384人(3.7%)]。MTX组未能诱导缓解的几率(ORs)明显高于硫嘌呤组[调整后OR(aOR),1.115;95%置信区间(CI),1.045-1.190;P = 0.001]。然而,仅在未同时使用类固醇的患者中观察到相反的结果:MTX 组诱导失败的风险低于硫嘌呤组(aOR,0.740;95% 置信区间(CI),0.673-0.813;P = 0.001]。标准剂量 MTX 组发生总体维持治疗失败的风险高于低剂量 MTX 组(aHR:1.296;95% CI:1.134-1.480;P 结论:硫嘌呤比呋喃妥因更有效:硫嘌呤比MTX更能有效诱导和维持生化免疫缺陷CD患者的病情缓解;然而,同时使用类固醇会影响病情缓解的诱导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differences in the risk of clinical failure between thiopurine and methotrexate in bio-naïve patients with Crohn's disease: a Korean nationwide population-based study.

Background: Although immunomodulators are widely prescribed in patients with Crohn's disease (CD), it is unclear whether there is a difference in treatment outcomes between thiopurines and methotrexate (MTX).

Objective: To compare the risk of clinical failure between thiopurines and MTX in bio-naïve patients with CD.

Design: Nationwide, population-based study.

Methods: We used claims data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to evaluate the risk of clinical failure in bio-naïve patients with CD treated with thiopurine (thiopurine group) or MTX (MTX group).

Results: Overall, 10,296 adult and pediatric patients with CD [9912 (96.3%) and 384 (3.7%) in the thiopurine and MTX groups, respectively] were included. The odds ratios (ORs) of failure to induce remission were significantly higher in the MTX group than in the thiopurine group [adjusted OR (aOR), 1.115; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.045-1.190; p = 0.001]. However, the opposite result was observed only in patients without concomitant steroid use: the MTX group had a lower risk of induction failure than the thiopurine group (aOR, 0.740; 95% CI, 0.673-0.813; p < 0.001). The risk of overall maintenance failure was higher in the MTX group than in the thiopurine group [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.117; 95% CI, 1.047-1.191; p = 0.001]. The risk of overall maintenance failure was higher in the standard-dose MTX group than in the low-dose MTX group (aHR, 1.296; 95% CI, 1.134-1.480; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the risk of maintenance failure according to the administration route of MTX.

Conclusion: Thiopurine is more effective than MTX in inducing and maintaining remission in bio-naïve patients with CD; however, the concomitant use of steroids influences inducing remission.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology is an open access journal which delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed original research articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at an international audience of clinicians and researchers in gastroenterology and related disciplines, providing an online forum for rapid dissemination of recent research and perspectives in this area. The editors welcome original research articles across all areas of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes original research articles and review articles primarily. Original research manuscripts may include laboratory, animal or human/clinical studies – all phases. Letters to the Editor and Case Reports will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Characteristics, clinical outcomes, and prognostic factors of colorectal cancer in patients with Crohn's disease: American versus Korean tertiary referral center perspectives. Artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies in ulcerative colitis. Weekend endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography has similar outcomes as weekday procedures-a propensity score match analysis of the Hungarian ERCP Registry. Effectiveness of autologous emulsified stromal vascular fraction tissue injection for the treatment of complex perianal fistulas in inflammatory bowel diseases patients: a pilot study. Depression influences fatigue in inflammatory bowel disease amongst other factors: a structural modelling approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1