确定普通牙科医生的正畸学习成果:基于德尔菲过程的课程修改

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Seminars in Orthodontics Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1053/j.sodo.2024.04.007
{"title":"确定普通牙科医生的正畸学习成果:基于德尔菲过程的课程修改","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.sodo.2024.04.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The quest to define orthodontic competencies for general dentists has been ongoing. The translation of these competencies into explicit learning outcomes and their integration into curriculum through instructional strategies and assessment tools has not been thoroughly documented in orthodontic literature. This study presents a methodical approach undertaken by a dental school to establish core orthodontic learning outcomes for newly graduated general dentists.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>We aim to detail the consensus-building process for establishing fundamental orthodontic learning outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Employing a modified Delphi method, this study sought to construct a consensus on orthodontic learning outcomes over three stages. Reviewing existing literature, we identified primary competency domains and formulated a preliminary set of outcomes. An expert panel was then convened, to critique and refine these outcomes. Miller's pyramid of clinical competence provided a framework for categorization. Disagreements on critical outcomes were addressed in the final stage, ensuring alignment with teaching and assessment methods.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A diverse panel of orthodontists participated in successive Delphi stages. We derived 93 learning outcomes across seven domains of practice, critical for new dental graduates. The outcomes were stratified into categories corresponding to Miller's pyramid. These categorizations informed the enhancement of assessment techniques and instructional strategies, culminating in the creation of a self-assessment tool.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The learning outcomes developed offer a strategic guide for evolving the undergraduate orthodontic curriculum. Such a structured set of outcomes can aid in the identification of learning gaps and foster a deeper understanding of educational needs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48688,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Orthodontics","volume":"30 4","pages":"Pages 413-421"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining orthodontic learning outcomes for general dentists: A modified Delphi process-based curricular modification\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.sodo.2024.04.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The quest to define orthodontic competencies for general dentists has been ongoing. The translation of these competencies into explicit learning outcomes and their integration into curriculum through instructional strategies and assessment tools has not been thoroughly documented in orthodontic literature. This study presents a methodical approach undertaken by a dental school to establish core orthodontic learning outcomes for newly graduated general dentists.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>We aim to detail the consensus-building process for establishing fundamental orthodontic learning outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Employing a modified Delphi method, this study sought to construct a consensus on orthodontic learning outcomes over three stages. Reviewing existing literature, we identified primary competency domains and formulated a preliminary set of outcomes. An expert panel was then convened, to critique and refine these outcomes. Miller's pyramid of clinical competence provided a framework for categorization. Disagreements on critical outcomes were addressed in the final stage, ensuring alignment with teaching and assessment methods.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A diverse panel of orthodontists participated in successive Delphi stages. We derived 93 learning outcomes across seven domains of practice, critical for new dental graduates. The outcomes were stratified into categories corresponding to Miller's pyramid. These categorizations informed the enhancement of assessment techniques and instructional strategies, culminating in the creation of a self-assessment tool.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The learning outcomes developed offer a strategic guide for evolving the undergraduate orthodontic curriculum. Such a structured set of outcomes can aid in the identification of learning gaps and foster a deeper understanding of educational needs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"30 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 413-421\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1073874624000471\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1073874624000471","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景为普通牙科医生定义正畸能力的工作一直在进行。将这些能力转化为明确的学习成果,并通过教学策略和评估工具将其整合到课程中,在正畸学文献中还没有详尽的记录。本研究介绍了一所牙科学院为新毕业的普通牙科医生建立核心正畸学习成果所采用的方法。目的我们旨在详细介绍建立基本正畸学习成果的共识过程。方法本研究采用改良德尔菲法,试图通过三个阶段就正畸学习成果达成共识。通过回顾现有文献,我们确定了主要的能力领域,并制定了一套初步的成果。然后召集了一个专家小组,对这些成果进行点评和完善。米勒的临床能力金字塔提供了一个分类框架。在最后阶段,对关键成果的分歧得到了解决,确保了与教学和评估方法的一致性。我们得出了 93 项学习成果,涉及七个实践领域,对刚毕业的牙科医生至关重要。根据米勒的金字塔理论,这些成果被分为不同的类别。这些分类为评估技术和教学策略的改进提供了依据,最终形成了一个自我评估工具。这样一套结构化的成果有助于发现学习差距,并促进对教育需求的深入了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Defining orthodontic learning outcomes for general dentists: A modified Delphi process-based curricular modification

Background

The quest to define orthodontic competencies for general dentists has been ongoing. The translation of these competencies into explicit learning outcomes and their integration into curriculum through instructional strategies and assessment tools has not been thoroughly documented in orthodontic literature. This study presents a methodical approach undertaken by a dental school to establish core orthodontic learning outcomes for newly graduated general dentists.

Objectives

We aim to detail the consensus-building process for establishing fundamental orthodontic learning outcomes.

Methods

Employing a modified Delphi method, this study sought to construct a consensus on orthodontic learning outcomes over three stages. Reviewing existing literature, we identified primary competency domains and formulated a preliminary set of outcomes. An expert panel was then convened, to critique and refine these outcomes. Miller's pyramid of clinical competence provided a framework for categorization. Disagreements on critical outcomes were addressed in the final stage, ensuring alignment with teaching and assessment methods.

Results

A diverse panel of orthodontists participated in successive Delphi stages. We derived 93 learning outcomes across seven domains of practice, critical for new dental graduates. The outcomes were stratified into categories corresponding to Miller's pyramid. These categorizations informed the enhancement of assessment techniques and instructional strategies, culminating in the creation of a self-assessment tool.

Conclusions

The learning outcomes developed offer a strategic guide for evolving the undergraduate orthodontic curriculum. Such a structured set of outcomes can aid in the identification of learning gaps and foster a deeper understanding of educational needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Orthodontics
Seminars in Orthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
28
审稿时长
10 days
期刊介绍: Each issue provides up-to-date, state-of-the-art information on a single topic in orthodontics. Readers are kept abreast of the latest innovations, research findings, clinical applications and clinical methods. Collection of the issues will provide invaluable reference material for present and future review.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of geometric changes in basal arch form after maxillary expansion between pure bone-borne and tissue-bone-borne appliance Assessment of the readability of online orthodontic educational resources related to ‘orthodontic treatment’: A cross-sectional study Orthodontic education in Gulf Cooperation Council countries: Overview of programs and challenges The applications of digital technology in postgraduate orthodontic education Shaping the research agenda for dental sleep-disordered breathing education in orthodontic residency programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1