向电动汽车转变的三大挑战:产业组织、产业政策和公正过渡

IF 3.1 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Sociology Compass Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1111/soc4.13218
Jun Ho Jeong, Chulsik Kim, Hyung Je Jo
{"title":"向电动汽车转变的三大挑战:产业组织、产业政策和公正过渡","authors":"Jun Ho Jeong, Chulsik Kim, Hyung Je Jo","doi":"10.1111/soc4.13218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to comprehensively review current research on the transformation within the automotive industry, with a specific focus on electrification, which has driven structural shifts. The exploration of three key dimensions forms the crux of this review: the technical aspects of the transition to electric vehicles (EVs) and the diverse perspectives on EVs as an innovative icon; the array of policy interventions linked to the transition and their distinctive features; and the intricate interplay of discourse and practices integral to the concept of a just transition. Examining these dimensions reveals a disparity between aspirational ideals and current realities in the transformative phase. While the shift to EVs revolutionizes automobile design, the mirroring hypothesis of a concomitant revolution in production and organizational paradigms lacks empirical support. The socio‐ecological transition encounters conflicts between transformative advocates, arguing for robust interventionist policies to overhaul the prevailing social‐technical automotive regime, and status quo upholders favoring an ecological modernization of the regime. Furthermore, the article underscores nuanced tensions in negotiating a just transition amid diverse stakeholder positions.","PeriodicalId":47997,"journal":{"name":"Sociology Compass","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three major challenges in the shift to electric vehicles: Industrial organization, industrial policy, and a just transition\",\"authors\":\"Jun Ho Jeong, Chulsik Kim, Hyung Je Jo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/soc4.13218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims to comprehensively review current research on the transformation within the automotive industry, with a specific focus on electrification, which has driven structural shifts. The exploration of three key dimensions forms the crux of this review: the technical aspects of the transition to electric vehicles (EVs) and the diverse perspectives on EVs as an innovative icon; the array of policy interventions linked to the transition and their distinctive features; and the intricate interplay of discourse and practices integral to the concept of a just transition. Examining these dimensions reveals a disparity between aspirational ideals and current realities in the transformative phase. While the shift to EVs revolutionizes automobile design, the mirroring hypothesis of a concomitant revolution in production and organizational paradigms lacks empirical support. The socio‐ecological transition encounters conflicts between transformative advocates, arguing for robust interventionist policies to overhaul the prevailing social‐technical automotive regime, and status quo upholders favoring an ecological modernization of the regime. Furthermore, the article underscores nuanced tensions in negotiating a just transition amid diverse stakeholder positions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociology Compass\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociology Compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13218\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology Compass","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13218","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在全面回顾当前有关汽车行业转型的研究,重点关注推动结构性转变的电气化。对三个关键方面的探讨构成了本综述的核心:向电动汽车(EV)过渡的技术方面以及将电动汽车作为创新标志的不同观点;与过渡相关的一系列政策干预措施及其鲜明特点;以及与公正过渡概念密不可分的言论和实践之间错综复杂的相互作用。对这些方面的研究揭示了转型阶段的远大理想与当前现实之间的差距。虽然向电动汽车的转变彻底改变了汽车设计,但生产和组织模式也随之发生革命的镜像假设却缺乏经验支持。社会-生态转型遇到了转型倡导者与现状支持者之间的冲突,前者主张采取强有力的干预政策,彻底改革现行的社会-技术汽车制度,而后者则支持制度的生态现代化。此外,文章还强调了在利益相关者立场各异的情况下,通过谈判实现公正转型过程中存在的微妙矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Three major challenges in the shift to electric vehicles: Industrial organization, industrial policy, and a just transition
This article aims to comprehensively review current research on the transformation within the automotive industry, with a specific focus on electrification, which has driven structural shifts. The exploration of three key dimensions forms the crux of this review: the technical aspects of the transition to electric vehicles (EVs) and the diverse perspectives on EVs as an innovative icon; the array of policy interventions linked to the transition and their distinctive features; and the intricate interplay of discourse and practices integral to the concept of a just transition. Examining these dimensions reveals a disparity between aspirational ideals and current realities in the transformative phase. While the shift to EVs revolutionizes automobile design, the mirroring hypothesis of a concomitant revolution in production and organizational paradigms lacks empirical support. The socio‐ecological transition encounters conflicts between transformative advocates, arguing for robust interventionist policies to overhaul the prevailing social‐technical automotive regime, and status quo upholders favoring an ecological modernization of the regime. Furthermore, the article underscores nuanced tensions in negotiating a just transition amid diverse stakeholder positions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sociology Compass
Sociology Compass SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
102
期刊最新文献
Critical Challenges to the Sociology of Work: From a Perspective of Russian Labor Studies Visual Analysis and the Contentious Politics of the Radical Right Caring Technologies: Confronting Invisible Work in Digital Capitalism Unlocking the Potential of the Decolonial Approach in Migration Studies Everyday Conversations About Economic Inequality: A Research Agenda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1