有限重叠测试

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Econometric Theory Pub Date : 2024-05-13 DOI:10.1017/s0266466624000161
Xinwei Ma, Yuya Sasaki, Yulong Wang
{"title":"有限重叠测试","authors":"Xinwei Ma, Yuya Sasaki, Yulong Wang","doi":"10.1017/s0266466624000161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extreme propensity scores arise in observational studies when treated and control units have very different characteristics. This is commonly referred to as <jats:italic>limited overlap</jats:italic>. In this paper, we propose a formal statistical test that helps assess the degree of limited overlap. Rejecting the null hypothesis in our test indicates either no or very mild degree of limited overlap and hence reassures that standard treatment effect estimators will be well behaved. One distinguishing feature of our test is that it only requires the use of a few extreme propensity scores, which is in stark contrast to other methods that require consistent estimates of some tail index. Without the need to extrapolate using observations far away from the tail, our procedure is expected to exhibit excellent size properties, a result that is also borne out in our simulation study.","PeriodicalId":49275,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Theory","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TESTING LIMITED OVERLAP\",\"authors\":\"Xinwei Ma, Yuya Sasaki, Yulong Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0266466624000161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Extreme propensity scores arise in observational studies when treated and control units have very different characteristics. This is commonly referred to as <jats:italic>limited overlap</jats:italic>. In this paper, we propose a formal statistical test that helps assess the degree of limited overlap. Rejecting the null hypothesis in our test indicates either no or very mild degree of limited overlap and hence reassures that standard treatment effect estimators will be well behaved. One distinguishing feature of our test is that it only requires the use of a few extreme propensity scores, which is in stark contrast to other methods that require consistent estimates of some tail index. Without the need to extrapolate using observations far away from the tail, our procedure is expected to exhibit excellent size properties, a result that is also borne out in our simulation study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Econometric Theory\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Econometric Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266466624000161\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Theory","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266466624000161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在观察性研究中,当治疗单位和对照单位的特征截然不同时,就会出现极端倾向分数。这通常被称为有限重叠。在本文中,我们提出了一种正式的统计检验方法,有助于评估有限重叠的程度。在我们的检验中,拒绝零假设表明不存在有限重叠或有限重叠程度很轻,因此可以保证标准的治疗效果估计值表现良好。我们测试的一个显著特点是,它只需要使用几个极端倾向得分,这与其他需要对某些尾部指数进行一致估计的方法形成了鲜明对比。由于不需要使用远离尾部的观测数据进行推断,我们的程序有望表现出极佳的规模特性,这一结果也在我们的模拟研究中得到了证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TESTING LIMITED OVERLAP
Extreme propensity scores arise in observational studies when treated and control units have very different characteristics. This is commonly referred to as limited overlap. In this paper, we propose a formal statistical test that helps assess the degree of limited overlap. Rejecting the null hypothesis in our test indicates either no or very mild degree of limited overlap and hence reassures that standard treatment effect estimators will be well behaved. One distinguishing feature of our test is that it only requires the use of a few extreme propensity scores, which is in stark contrast to other methods that require consistent estimates of some tail index. Without the need to extrapolate using observations far away from the tail, our procedure is expected to exhibit excellent size properties, a result that is also borne out in our simulation study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Econometric Theory
Econometric Theory MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its inception, Econometric Theory has aimed to endow econometrics with an innovative journal dedicated to advance theoretical research in econometrics. It provides a centralized professional outlet for original theoretical contributions in all of the major areas of econometrics, and all fields of research in econometric theory fall within the scope of ET. In addition, ET fosters the multidisciplinary features of econometrics that extend beyond economics. Particularly welcome are articles that promote original econometric research in relation to mathematical finance, stochastic processes, statistics, and probability theory, as well as computationally intensive areas of economics such as modern industrial organization and dynamic macroeconomics.
期刊最新文献
INFERENCE IN MILDLY EXPLOSIVE AUTOREGRESSIONS UNDER UNCONDITIONAL HETEROSKEDASTICITY EFFICIENCY IN ESTIMATION UNDER MONOTONIC ATTRITION WELFARE ANALYSIS VIA MARGINAL TREATMENT EFFECTS APPLICATIONS OF FUNCTIONAL DEPENDENCE TO SPATIAL ECONOMETRICS IDENTIFICATION AND STATISTICAL DECISION THEORY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1