开发与药物相关跌倒筛查和评分工具,并对其进行德尔菲共识验证。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1007/s11096-024-01734-w
Dima Saeed, Gillian Carter, Ruth Miller, Carmel Darcy, Karen Miller, Kevin Madden, Hilary McKee, Jayne Agnew, Paula Crawford, Carole Parsons
{"title":"开发与药物相关跌倒筛查和评分工具,并对其进行德尔菲共识验证。","authors":"Dima Saeed, Gillian Carter, Ruth Miller, Carmel Darcy, Karen Miller, Kevin Madden, Hilary McKee, Jayne Agnew, Paula Crawford, Carole Parsons","doi":"10.1007/s11096-024-01734-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Falls are a significant public health problem and constitute a major cause of injuries and mortality. Risk factors for falls are multifactorial and include medication use.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop and investigate the content validity of the Medication-Related fall (MRF) screening and scoring tool.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The MRF tool was developed from clinical practice guidelines addressing medication-related problems, and additional medications identified by specialist pharmacists across a region of the United Kingdom (Northern Ireland). Medication classes were categorised according to their 'potential to cause falls' as: high-risk (three points), moderate-risk (two points) or low-risk (one point). The overall medication-related falls risk for the patient was determined by summing the scores for all medications. The MRF was validated using Delphi consensus methodology, whereby three iterative rounds of surveys were conducted using SurveyMonkey<sup>®</sup>. Twenty-two experts from 10 countries determined their agreement with the falls risk associated with each medication on a 5-point Likert scale. Only medications with at least 75% of respondents agreeing or strongly agreeing were retained in the next round.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consensus was reached for 19 medications/medication classes to be included in the final version of the MRF tool; ten were classified as high-risk, eight as moderate-risk and one as low-risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MRF tool is simple and has the potential to be integrated into medicines optimisation to reduce falls risk and negative fall-related outcomes. The score from the MRF tool can be used as a clinical parameter to assess the need for medication review and clinical interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":13828,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"977-986"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11286707/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Delphi consensus validation of the Medication-Related Fall screening and scoring tool.\",\"authors\":\"Dima Saeed, Gillian Carter, Ruth Miller, Carmel Darcy, Karen Miller, Kevin Madden, Hilary McKee, Jayne Agnew, Paula Crawford, Carole Parsons\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11096-024-01734-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Falls are a significant public health problem and constitute a major cause of injuries and mortality. Risk factors for falls are multifactorial and include medication use.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop and investigate the content validity of the Medication-Related fall (MRF) screening and scoring tool.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The MRF tool was developed from clinical practice guidelines addressing medication-related problems, and additional medications identified by specialist pharmacists across a region of the United Kingdom (Northern Ireland). Medication classes were categorised according to their 'potential to cause falls' as: high-risk (three points), moderate-risk (two points) or low-risk (one point). The overall medication-related falls risk for the patient was determined by summing the scores for all medications. The MRF was validated using Delphi consensus methodology, whereby three iterative rounds of surveys were conducted using SurveyMonkey<sup>®</sup>. Twenty-two experts from 10 countries determined their agreement with the falls risk associated with each medication on a 5-point Likert scale. Only medications with at least 75% of respondents agreeing or strongly agreeing were retained in the next round.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consensus was reached for 19 medications/medication classes to be included in the final version of the MRF tool; ten were classified as high-risk, eight as moderate-risk and one as low-risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MRF tool is simple and has the potential to be integrated into medicines optimisation to reduce falls risk and negative fall-related outcomes. The score from the MRF tool can be used as a clinical parameter to assess the need for medication review and clinical interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"977-986\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11286707/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-024-01734-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-024-01734-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:跌倒是一个重大的公共卫生问题,也是造成伤害和死亡的主要原因。跌倒的风险因素是多方面的,其中包括用药。目的:开发与用药相关的跌倒(MRF)筛查和评分工具,并研究其内容的有效性:方法:MRF 工具是根据解决用药相关问题的临床实践指南以及英国一个地区(北爱尔兰)的专科药剂师确定的其他药物开发的。药物类别根据其 "导致跌倒的可能性 "分为:高风险(3 分)、中度风险(2 分)或低风险(1 分)。患者与药物相关的总体跌倒风险由所有药物的得分总和决定。MRF 采用德尔菲共识法进行验证,即使用 SurveyMonkey® 进行三轮反复调查。来自 10 个国家的 22 位专家通过 5 点李克特量表确定了他们对每种药物相关跌倒风险的认同度。只有至少 75% 的受访者表示同意或非常同意的药物才会被纳入下一轮调查:结果:19 种药物/药物类别被纳入 MRF 工具的最终版本;其中 10 种被归类为高风险,8 种被归类为中度风险,1 种被归类为低风险:MRF工具操作简单,有可能被整合到药物优化中,以降低跌倒风险和与跌倒相关的不良后果。MRF工具的评分可作为临床参数,用于评估药物审查和临床干预的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and Delphi consensus validation of the Medication-Related Fall screening and scoring tool.

Background: Falls are a significant public health problem and constitute a major cause of injuries and mortality. Risk factors for falls are multifactorial and include medication use.

Aim: To develop and investigate the content validity of the Medication-Related fall (MRF) screening and scoring tool.

Method: The MRF tool was developed from clinical practice guidelines addressing medication-related problems, and additional medications identified by specialist pharmacists across a region of the United Kingdom (Northern Ireland). Medication classes were categorised according to their 'potential to cause falls' as: high-risk (three points), moderate-risk (two points) or low-risk (one point). The overall medication-related falls risk for the patient was determined by summing the scores for all medications. The MRF was validated using Delphi consensus methodology, whereby three iterative rounds of surveys were conducted using SurveyMonkey®. Twenty-two experts from 10 countries determined their agreement with the falls risk associated with each medication on a 5-point Likert scale. Only medications with at least 75% of respondents agreeing or strongly agreeing were retained in the next round.

Results: Consensus was reached for 19 medications/medication classes to be included in the final version of the MRF tool; ten were classified as high-risk, eight as moderate-risk and one as low-risk.

Conclusion: The MRF tool is simple and has the potential to be integrated into medicines optimisation to reduce falls risk and negative fall-related outcomes. The score from the MRF tool can be used as a clinical parameter to assess the need for medication review and clinical interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
131
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy (IJCP) offers a platform for articles on research in Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Care and related practice-oriented subjects in the pharmaceutical sciences. IJCP is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research data, new ideas and discussions on pharmacotherapy and outcome research, clinical pharmacy, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacoeconomics, the clinical use of medicines, medical devices and laboratory tests, information on medicines and medical devices information, pharmacy services research, medication management, other clinical aspects of pharmacy. IJCP publishes original Research articles, Review articles , Short research reports, Commentaries, book reviews, and Letters to the Editor. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy is affiliated with the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP). ESCP promotes practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy, especially in Europe. The general aim of the society is to advance education, practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy . Until 2010 the journal was called Pharmacy World & Science.
期刊最新文献
European Society of Clinical Pharmacy: 'the prescribing pharmacist: a prescription for better patient care'. Diagnostic evaluation of hypersensitivity reactions to arylpropionic acid derivatives: a descriptive observational study focusing on clinical characteristics and potential risk factors in children. Liver injury associated with endothelin receptor antagonists: a pharmacovigilance study based on FDA adverse event reporting system data. Drug-related emergency department visits: external validation of an assessment tool in a general emergency department population. Identification of seniors at risk (ISAR) score and potentially inappropriate prescribing: a retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1