术中眼内透镜浪费:发生率、成本和原因。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Seminars in Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-05-19 DOI:10.1080/08820538.2024.2354692
Junjie Cai, Yamin Li, Dongdong Pan, Xiaomeng Li, Nived Moonasar, Zhong Lin, Yinghui Shi, Jianxia Lin, Peihua Zhang
{"title":"术中眼内透镜浪费:发生率、成本和原因。","authors":"Junjie Cai, Yamin Li, Dongdong Pan, Xiaomeng Li, Nived Moonasar, Zhong Lin, Yinghui Shi, Jianxia Lin, Peihua Zhang","doi":"10.1080/08820538.2024.2354692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the incidence and cost of intraocular lens(IOL) waste during IOL implantation, as well as the reasons for it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of 485 patients from the IOL waste registers of a single tertiary eye hospital in China during 2016-2020. The primary outcomes were the incidence, cost, and reasons for different IOL properties. Cases were examined to ascertain IOL material, design, procedural details, and causes of waste.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IOL waste occurred in 485 (6.62‰) of the 73,246 IOL implantations during the study period. The total cost of IOL waste was 429, 850.26 Chinese Yuan (CNY) related to waste with an average cost of 2, 442.33 CNY per procedure during the study period. Comparisons between IOL properties showed that polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) material (39, 2.05%), three-piece design (142, 1.49%), and secondary IOL implantation (26, 2.16%) were associated with IOL wastage, and the difference was statistically significant. The causes of IOL waste were damage (107, 60.80%), patient reasons (37, 21.26%), aseptic errors (22, 12.50%), IOL quality problems (8, 4.55%), and loss (2, 1.14%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of IOL waste is low, but still leads to a significant cost burden due to a large number of cataract surgeries. PMMA material, three-piece design, and secondary implantation were identified as factors increasing IOL waste. Damage emerged as the primary reason for waste, largely attributed to human error. Therefore, the development of strategies to mitigate IOL waste is imperative.</p>","PeriodicalId":21702,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative Intraocular Lens Waste: Incidence, Cost and Reasons.\",\"authors\":\"Junjie Cai, Yamin Li, Dongdong Pan, Xiaomeng Li, Nived Moonasar, Zhong Lin, Yinghui Shi, Jianxia Lin, Peihua Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08820538.2024.2354692\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the incidence and cost of intraocular lens(IOL) waste during IOL implantation, as well as the reasons for it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of 485 patients from the IOL waste registers of a single tertiary eye hospital in China during 2016-2020. The primary outcomes were the incidence, cost, and reasons for different IOL properties. Cases were examined to ascertain IOL material, design, procedural details, and causes of waste.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IOL waste occurred in 485 (6.62‰) of the 73,246 IOL implantations during the study period. The total cost of IOL waste was 429, 850.26 Chinese Yuan (CNY) related to waste with an average cost of 2, 442.33 CNY per procedure during the study period. Comparisons between IOL properties showed that polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) material (39, 2.05%), three-piece design (142, 1.49%), and secondary IOL implantation (26, 2.16%) were associated with IOL wastage, and the difference was statistically significant. The causes of IOL waste were damage (107, 60.80%), patient reasons (37, 21.26%), aseptic errors (22, 12.50%), IOL quality problems (8, 4.55%), and loss (2, 1.14%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of IOL waste is low, but still leads to a significant cost burden due to a large number of cataract surgeries. PMMA material, three-piece design, and secondary implantation were identified as factors increasing IOL waste. Damage emerged as the primary reason for waste, largely attributed to human error. Therefore, the development of strategies to mitigate IOL waste is imperative.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2024.2354692\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2024.2354692","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估人工晶体植入术中眼球内人工晶体(IOL)浪费的发生率、成本及其原因:方法:对中国一家三级眼科医院 2016-2020 年间人工晶体浪费登记册中 485 例患者的数据进行回顾性分析。主要结果是不同人工晶体属性的发生率、成本和原因。对病例进行检查,以确定人工晶体的材料、设计、手术细节以及造成浪费的原因:研究期间,在 73,246 例人工晶体植入手术中,有 485 例(6.62‰)发生了人工晶体废用。在研究期间,人工晶体浪费的总费用为 429 850.26 人民币,平均每例手术花费 2 442.33 人民币。对人工晶体性能的比较显示,聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)材料(39,2.05%)、三件式设计(142,1.49%)和二次人工晶体植入(26,2.16%)与人工晶体浪费有关,且差异具有统计学意义。造成人工晶体浪费的原因包括:损坏(107,60.80%)、患者原因(37,21.26%)、无菌操作失误(22,12.50%)、人工晶体质量问题(8,4.55%)和丢失(2,1.14%):人工晶体浪费的发生率很低,但由于白内障手术数量庞大,仍会造成巨大的成本负担。PMMA材料、三片式设计和二次植入被认为是增加人工晶体浪费的因素。损坏是造成浪费的主要原因,这主要归咎于人为错误。因此,制定减少人工晶体浪费的策略势在必行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intraoperative Intraocular Lens Waste: Incidence, Cost and Reasons.

Purpose: To evaluate the incidence and cost of intraocular lens(IOL) waste during IOL implantation, as well as the reasons for it.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of 485 patients from the IOL waste registers of a single tertiary eye hospital in China during 2016-2020. The primary outcomes were the incidence, cost, and reasons for different IOL properties. Cases were examined to ascertain IOL material, design, procedural details, and causes of waste.

Results: IOL waste occurred in 485 (6.62‰) of the 73,246 IOL implantations during the study period. The total cost of IOL waste was 429, 850.26 Chinese Yuan (CNY) related to waste with an average cost of 2, 442.33 CNY per procedure during the study period. Comparisons between IOL properties showed that polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) material (39, 2.05%), three-piece design (142, 1.49%), and secondary IOL implantation (26, 2.16%) were associated with IOL wastage, and the difference was statistically significant. The causes of IOL waste were damage (107, 60.80%), patient reasons (37, 21.26%), aseptic errors (22, 12.50%), IOL quality problems (8, 4.55%), and loss (2, 1.14%).

Conclusions: The incidence of IOL waste is low, but still leads to a significant cost burden due to a large number of cataract surgeries. PMMA material, three-piece design, and secondary implantation were identified as factors increasing IOL waste. Damage emerged as the primary reason for waste, largely attributed to human error. Therefore, the development of strategies to mitigate IOL waste is imperative.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Ophthalmology
Seminars in Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Ophthalmology offers current, clinically oriented reviews on the diagnosis and treatment of ophthalmic disorders. Each issue focuses on a single topic, with a primary emphasis on appropriate surgical techniques.
期刊最新文献
Diagnosing Cataracts in the Digital Age: A Survey on AI, Metaverse, and Digital Twin Applications. Lacrimal History - Part VIII: Doyens of Dacryology Series - Lorenz Heister (1683-1758) and His Surgical Treatise. Evaluation of Early Accommodation Outcomes Following Femtosecond Laser-Assisted in situ Keratomileusis and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction. Concurrent Suprachoroidal & Vitreous Haemorrhage : A Rare Ocular Manifestation of Severe Dengue Fever. The Light Switch and the Dimmer: Qualitative Observations to Improve Diagnostic Lacrimal Irrigation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1