退化草地上根系生产对不同恢复措施的反应

Meng Cui, Hong-Hui Wu, Chang-Qing Jing, Tao Zhang, Shi-Ying Zhao, Ying-Zhi Gao
{"title":"退化草地上根系生产对不同恢复措施的反应","authors":"Meng Cui, Hong-Hui Wu, Chang-Qing Jing, Tao Zhang, Shi-Ying Zhao, Ying-Zhi Gao","doi":"10.1093/jpe/rtae044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Belowground parameters, e.g. root production and dynamics, play a pivotal role in evaluating the restoration degree of degraded grasslands. However, it remains unclear how roots respond to the combined restoration measures. To investigate root responses to different restoration treatments, a field experiment was conducted in a degraded Songnen meadow from 2013 to 2014. The treatments included: free grazing (FG), no ploughing (NP), only ploughing (OP), ploughing and N additions (PF), ploughing and mulching (PM), ploughing with N additions and mulching (PFM). Our results showed the seasonal dynamics pattern of roots was a unimodal pattern, which mainly was influenced by precipitation rather than restoration measures. The impacts of different restoration measures on root production were dependent on precipitation. In 2013, compared to FG, only PFM significantly increased root production by 242.34% (0-10 cm) and 90.8% (10-20 cm), which was mainly attributed to the increase of ANPP, soil moisture, and root numbers. However, restoration measures had minor effects on root production in 2014. Root turnover ranged from 0.47 yr-1 to 0.78 yr-1 and was not significantly changed by different restored measures. This is because the dominant annual species, Chloris virgata, exhibited relatively small changes in root turnover across different plots. Moreover, PFM improved soil conditions, leading to increased root lifespan and survival rate. Our results suggest that the combined measures are an effective way to accelerate belowground restoration in the degraded Songnen meadow.","PeriodicalId":503671,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plant Ecology","volume":"53 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response of root production to different restoration measures in a degraded meadow\",\"authors\":\"Meng Cui, Hong-Hui Wu, Chang-Qing Jing, Tao Zhang, Shi-Ying Zhao, Ying-Zhi Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jpe/rtae044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Belowground parameters, e.g. root production and dynamics, play a pivotal role in evaluating the restoration degree of degraded grasslands. However, it remains unclear how roots respond to the combined restoration measures. To investigate root responses to different restoration treatments, a field experiment was conducted in a degraded Songnen meadow from 2013 to 2014. The treatments included: free grazing (FG), no ploughing (NP), only ploughing (OP), ploughing and N additions (PF), ploughing and mulching (PM), ploughing with N additions and mulching (PFM). Our results showed the seasonal dynamics pattern of roots was a unimodal pattern, which mainly was influenced by precipitation rather than restoration measures. The impacts of different restoration measures on root production were dependent on precipitation. In 2013, compared to FG, only PFM significantly increased root production by 242.34% (0-10 cm) and 90.8% (10-20 cm), which was mainly attributed to the increase of ANPP, soil moisture, and root numbers. However, restoration measures had minor effects on root production in 2014. Root turnover ranged from 0.47 yr-1 to 0.78 yr-1 and was not significantly changed by different restored measures. This is because the dominant annual species, Chloris virgata, exhibited relatively small changes in root turnover across different plots. Moreover, PFM improved soil conditions, leading to increased root lifespan and survival rate. Our results suggest that the combined measures are an effective way to accelerate belowground restoration in the degraded Songnen meadow.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Plant Ecology\",\"volume\":\"53 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Plant Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtae044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plant Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtae044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地下参数,例如根系的生产和动态,在评估退化草地的恢复程度方面起着关键作用。然而,目前仍不清楚根系对综合恢复措施的反应。为了研究根系对不同恢复措施的反应,2013 年至 2014 年期间在一片退化的松嫩草地上进行了一项田间试验。处理包括:自由放牧(FG)、不耕作(NP)、只耕作(OP)、耕作和添加氮(PF)、耕作和覆盖(PM)、耕作添加氮和覆盖(PFM)。结果表明,根系的季节动态模式为单峰模式,主要受降水而非恢复措施的影响。不同恢复措施对根系生产的影响取决于降水量。2013 年,与 FG 相比,只有 PFM 能显著提高根系产量 242.34%(0-10 cm)和 90.8%(10-20 cm),这主要归因于 ANPP、土壤水分和根系数量的增加。然而,2014 年的恢复措施对根系生产的影响较小。根系周转率从 0.47 yr-1 到 0.78 yr-1,不同的恢复措施对根系周转率的影响并不显著。这是因为一年生优势物种 Chloris virgata 在不同地块的根系周转率变化相对较小。此外,PFM 改善了土壤条件,从而提高了根的寿命和存活率。我们的研究结果表明,综合措施是加速退化的松嫩草原地下恢复的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Response of root production to different restoration measures in a degraded meadow
Belowground parameters, e.g. root production and dynamics, play a pivotal role in evaluating the restoration degree of degraded grasslands. However, it remains unclear how roots respond to the combined restoration measures. To investigate root responses to different restoration treatments, a field experiment was conducted in a degraded Songnen meadow from 2013 to 2014. The treatments included: free grazing (FG), no ploughing (NP), only ploughing (OP), ploughing and N additions (PF), ploughing and mulching (PM), ploughing with N additions and mulching (PFM). Our results showed the seasonal dynamics pattern of roots was a unimodal pattern, which mainly was influenced by precipitation rather than restoration measures. The impacts of different restoration measures on root production were dependent on precipitation. In 2013, compared to FG, only PFM significantly increased root production by 242.34% (0-10 cm) and 90.8% (10-20 cm), which was mainly attributed to the increase of ANPP, soil moisture, and root numbers. However, restoration measures had minor effects on root production in 2014. Root turnover ranged from 0.47 yr-1 to 0.78 yr-1 and was not significantly changed by different restored measures. This is because the dominant annual species, Chloris virgata, exhibited relatively small changes in root turnover across different plots. Moreover, PFM improved soil conditions, leading to increased root lifespan and survival rate. Our results suggest that the combined measures are an effective way to accelerate belowground restoration in the degraded Songnen meadow.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Manipulated Microtopography Alters Plant Community Development in Fragile Farm-Pastoral Transition Zone Increasing biochar diversity promotes impacts of plant diversity on remediating cadmium in the soil Effects of leguminous green manure-crop rotation on soil enzyme activities and stoichiometry Sex-specific phosphorus (P)-use and -acquisition in dioecious Populus euphratica as affected by soil moisture levels Differential phenological responses to temperature among different stages of spring vegetation green-up
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1