用苗后除草剂控制粉红马齿苋(马齿苋

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q3 AGRONOMY Weed Technology Pub Date : 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1017/wet.2024.28
Nicholas J. Shay, E. Prostko
{"title":"用苗后除草剂控制粉红马齿苋(马齿苋","authors":"Nicholas J. Shay, E. Prostko","doi":"10.1017/wet.2024.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Pink purslane is often ranked as one of the most troublesome weeds in vegetable production systems in Georgia. Pink purslane encroachment along the field edges and in-field of agronomic crops has recently increased. Postemergence (POST) herbicides are an effective component of agronomic crop weed management. However, little research has addressed pink purslane control in agronomic crops. Therefore, greenhouse and field studies were conducted from 2022 to 2023 in Tifton, Georgia, to evaluate the response of pink purslane to POST herbicides commonly used in agronomic crops. Greenhouse screening provided preliminary evidence whereby 13 of the 21 POST herbicides evaluated provided ≥ 80% above-ground biomass reductions. These 13 herbicides were then used for field studies. Results from the field studies, pooled across two locations, indicated only 3 of the 13 herbicides provided above-ground biomass reductions ≥ 70% compared to the non-treated control. These herbicides included atrazine at 1682 g ai ha-1, glufosinate at 656 g ai ha-1, and lactofen at 219 g ai ha-1 with 79%, 70%, and 83% biomass reduction, respectively (P < 0.05). This research suggests that many of the POST herbicides used in agronomic crops will not effectively control pink purslane. Thus, when trying to manage pink purslane with POST herbicides in agronomic crops, growers should plant crops/cultivars tolerant of either atrazine, glufosinate, and/or lactofen.","PeriodicalId":23710,"journal":{"name":"Weed Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pink Purslane (Portulaca pilosa) Control with Postemergence Herbicides\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas J. Shay, E. Prostko\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/wet.2024.28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Pink purslane is often ranked as one of the most troublesome weeds in vegetable production systems in Georgia. Pink purslane encroachment along the field edges and in-field of agronomic crops has recently increased. Postemergence (POST) herbicides are an effective component of agronomic crop weed management. However, little research has addressed pink purslane control in agronomic crops. Therefore, greenhouse and field studies were conducted from 2022 to 2023 in Tifton, Georgia, to evaluate the response of pink purslane to POST herbicides commonly used in agronomic crops. Greenhouse screening provided preliminary evidence whereby 13 of the 21 POST herbicides evaluated provided ≥ 80% above-ground biomass reductions. These 13 herbicides were then used for field studies. Results from the field studies, pooled across two locations, indicated only 3 of the 13 herbicides provided above-ground biomass reductions ≥ 70% compared to the non-treated control. These herbicides included atrazine at 1682 g ai ha-1, glufosinate at 656 g ai ha-1, and lactofen at 219 g ai ha-1 with 79%, 70%, and 83% biomass reduction, respectively (P < 0.05). This research suggests that many of the POST herbicides used in agronomic crops will not effectively control pink purslane. Thus, when trying to manage pink purslane with POST herbicides in agronomic crops, growers should plant crops/cultivars tolerant of either atrazine, glufosinate, and/or lactofen.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Weed Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Weed Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2024.28\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weed Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2024.28","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

粉红马齿苋通常被列为佐治亚州蔬菜生产系统中最棘手的杂草之一。最近,粉红马齿苋在田边和农艺作物田间的侵扰有所增加。萌发后(POST)除草剂是农作物杂草管理的有效组成部分。然而,很少有研究涉及粉红马齿苋在农作物中的防治。因此,我们于 2022 年至 2023 年在佐治亚州蒂夫顿开展了温室和田间研究,以评估粉红马齿苋对农作物常用的苗后除草剂的反应。温室筛选提供的初步证据表明,在 21 种经评估的后效除草剂中,有 13 种可减少≥ 80% 的地上生物量。这 13 种除草剂随后被用于田间研究。两个地点的实地研究结果表明,与未处理的对照组相比,13 种除草剂中只有 3 种能使地上生物量减少 ≥ 70%。这些除草剂包括剂量为 1682 g ai ha-1 的阿特拉津、剂量为 656 g ai ha-1 的草铵膦和剂量为 219 g ai ha-1 的乳氟禾草灵,其生物量减少率分别为 79%、70% 和 83%(P < 0.05)。这项研究表明,许多用于农作物的后效除草剂不能有效控制粉红马齿苋。因此,在尝试使用农艺作物中的后效除草剂控制粉红马齿苋时,种植者应种植耐受阿特拉津、草胺膦和/或乳油的作物/栽培品种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pink Purslane (Portulaca pilosa) Control with Postemergence Herbicides
Pink purslane is often ranked as one of the most troublesome weeds in vegetable production systems in Georgia. Pink purslane encroachment along the field edges and in-field of agronomic crops has recently increased. Postemergence (POST) herbicides are an effective component of agronomic crop weed management. However, little research has addressed pink purslane control in agronomic crops. Therefore, greenhouse and field studies were conducted from 2022 to 2023 in Tifton, Georgia, to evaluate the response of pink purslane to POST herbicides commonly used in agronomic crops. Greenhouse screening provided preliminary evidence whereby 13 of the 21 POST herbicides evaluated provided ≥ 80% above-ground biomass reductions. These 13 herbicides were then used for field studies. Results from the field studies, pooled across two locations, indicated only 3 of the 13 herbicides provided above-ground biomass reductions ≥ 70% compared to the non-treated control. These herbicides included atrazine at 1682 g ai ha-1, glufosinate at 656 g ai ha-1, and lactofen at 219 g ai ha-1 with 79%, 70%, and 83% biomass reduction, respectively (P < 0.05). This research suggests that many of the POST herbicides used in agronomic crops will not effectively control pink purslane. Thus, when trying to manage pink purslane with POST herbicides in agronomic crops, growers should plant crops/cultivars tolerant of either atrazine, glufosinate, and/or lactofen.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Weed Technology
Weed Technology 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
21.40%
发文量
89
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Weed Technology publishes original research and scholarship in the form of peer-reviewed articles focused on understanding how weeds are managed. The journal focuses on: - Applied aspects concerning the management of weeds in agricultural systems - Herbicides used to manage undesired vegetation, weed biology and control - Weed/crop management systems - Reports of new weed problems -New technologies for weed management and special articles emphasizing technology transfer to improve weed control -Articles dealing with plant growth regulators and management of undesired plant growth may also be accepted, provided there is clear relevance to weed science technology, e.g., turfgrass or woody plant management along rights-of-way, vegetation management in forest, aquatic, or other non-crop situations. -Surveys, education, and extension topics related to weeds will also be considered
期刊最新文献
Impact of reduced rates of tiafenacil at vegetative growth stages on rice growth and yield Biologically effective dose of diflufenican applied preemergence for the control of multiple herbicide-resistant waterhemp in corn Target site mechanism confers resistance pattern of ACCase-inhibitors in bearded sprangletop (Leptochloa fusca ssp. fascicularis) from California Development and Validation of Avena Integrated Management (AIM): A Bioeconomic Decision Support Tool for Wild Oat Management in Australian Grain Production Systems Grain Sorghum Response to Simulated Fomesafen and Terbacil Carryover from Watermelons in Georgia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1