城市固体废物能源生产的生命周期评估:伊斯坦布尔案例

Afşin Çetinkaya, Levent Bilgili
{"title":"城市固体废物能源生产的生命周期评估:伊斯坦布尔案例","authors":"Afşin Çetinkaya, Levent Bilgili","doi":"10.35208/ert.1455985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several methods are used during waste management: landfill, incineration, composting, anaerobic digestion, pyrolysis, and recycling etc. In particular, the use of biogas formed through anaerobic digestion in energy production and the energy obtained through the incineration process is very effective in turning the negative effects of wastes into positive ones. In this study, the effects of three different waste management scenarios were examined from a life cycle perspective. According to the results, scenario1 (landfill and incineration), scenario2 (landfill, incineration, and anaerobic digestion), and scenario3 (landfill, anaerobic digestion, and recycle) produced emissions of 3233.1, 328.8, and -848.9 kg of CO2eq, respectively. Accordingly, it is observed that the landfill application gave the worst environmental result, the incineration and anaerobic digestion applications reduce the environmental effects and the recycling application provides environmental benefits. It is concluded that the best environmental practice is plastic and metal recycling.","PeriodicalId":126818,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Life Cycle Assessment of Energy Production from Municipal Solid Waste: Istanbul Case\",\"authors\":\"Afşin Çetinkaya, Levent Bilgili\",\"doi\":\"10.35208/ert.1455985\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several methods are used during waste management: landfill, incineration, composting, anaerobic digestion, pyrolysis, and recycling etc. In particular, the use of biogas formed through anaerobic digestion in energy production and the energy obtained through the incineration process is very effective in turning the negative effects of wastes into positive ones. In this study, the effects of three different waste management scenarios were examined from a life cycle perspective. According to the results, scenario1 (landfill and incineration), scenario2 (landfill, incineration, and anaerobic digestion), and scenario3 (landfill, anaerobic digestion, and recycle) produced emissions of 3233.1, 328.8, and -848.9 kg of CO2eq, respectively. Accordingly, it is observed that the landfill application gave the worst environmental result, the incineration and anaerobic digestion applications reduce the environmental effects and the recycling application provides environmental benefits. It is concluded that the best environmental practice is plastic and metal recycling.\",\"PeriodicalId\":126818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Research and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Research and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1455985\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1455985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在废物管理过程中使用了几种方法:填埋、焚烧、堆肥、厌氧消化、热解和回收等。其中,利用厌氧消化产生的沼气生产能源和利用焚烧过程获得的能源,能有效地将废物的负面影响转化为正面影响。本研究从生命周期的角度研究了三种不同的废物管理方案的影响。结果显示,方案 1(填埋和焚烧)、方案 2(填埋、焚烧和厌氧消化)和方案 3(填埋、厌氧消化和回收)分别产生了 3233.1、328.8 和 -848.9 千克二氧化碳当量的排放。由此可见,填埋法产生的环境效果最差,焚烧法和厌氧消化法减少了对环境的影响,而循环利用法则带来了环境效益。结论是最佳的环保做法是塑料和金属回收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Life Cycle Assessment of Energy Production from Municipal Solid Waste: Istanbul Case
Several methods are used during waste management: landfill, incineration, composting, anaerobic digestion, pyrolysis, and recycling etc. In particular, the use of biogas formed through anaerobic digestion in energy production and the energy obtained through the incineration process is very effective in turning the negative effects of wastes into positive ones. In this study, the effects of three different waste management scenarios were examined from a life cycle perspective. According to the results, scenario1 (landfill and incineration), scenario2 (landfill, incineration, and anaerobic digestion), and scenario3 (landfill, anaerobic digestion, and recycle) produced emissions of 3233.1, 328.8, and -848.9 kg of CO2eq, respectively. Accordingly, it is observed that the landfill application gave the worst environmental result, the incineration and anaerobic digestion applications reduce the environmental effects and the recycling application provides environmental benefits. It is concluded that the best environmental practice is plastic and metal recycling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determination of microplastics in Japanese threadfin bream (Nemipterus japonicus), Indian Mackerel (Rastrelliger kanagurta) from Kasimedu Landing Centre, Chennai, Catfish (Arius sp.) and Mud Crab (Scylla olivacea) from Ennore Creek, Chennai, India: A comparative study using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy Combined treatment of domestic wastewater with landfill leachate using aerobic moving bed bioreactor (AeMBBR) Air Pollution and Ethical Consumption Behavior Due to Fragrances NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF TRANSIENT SOIL TEMPERATURE VARIATION DURING WILDFIRES Multidisciplinary Perspective: A Review of the Importance of Communication in Managing Climate Change Challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1