再次剖腹产患者腹腔内粘连的发生率:一项观察性回顾研究

T. Kiruthika, T. Jayanthy
{"title":"再次剖腹产患者腹腔内粘连的发生率:一项观察性回顾研究","authors":"T. Kiruthika, T. Jayanthy","doi":"10.18231/j.ijogr.2024.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": To study the prevalence of intraabdominal adhesion in repeat CS and evaluate the maternal and fetal outcome.: CS is a lifesaving procedure for the mother and fetus, but have multiple complications like adhesions, abdominal pain, prolonged duration of surgery, postoperative bleeding, and identification of these can help improve maternal and fetal outcome and care.: This retrospective study reviewed 70 pregnant women undergoing repeat CS. Data was tabulated and analyzed and adhesions were scored based on a system into dense and flimsy, and its dimensions. Chi Square test was used to observe association. P-value<0.05 was taken as significant.: Adhesions were noted in 30(42.9%) of the subjects and 40(57.1%) patients had no adhesions. Dense adhesions were noted in 19(27.1%) and flimsy in 11(15.7%) patients. Among those with adhesions – 6(20%) had atonic postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). No association was noted with fetal outcome. There was a statistically significant increase in duration of surgery in those with adhesions – 126.83 minutes +/- 19.85 than in those without adhesions – 82.35 minutes +/-12.82. Those patients with dense adhesions, the duration of surgery was – 132.63 minutes +/-21.88 and with flimsy adhesions – 116.82 minutes +/-82.: Repeat CS with adhesions increased the duration of surgery, increased the chances of PPH and had no statistically significant effect on neonatal outcome. Furthermore, duration of surgery was prolonged with dense adhesions. Further research can be done including post operative complications, details of prior CS and interpregnancy interval and thereby adhesion prevalence.","PeriodicalId":13288,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of intra-abdominal adhesions in patients undergoing repeat cesarean section: An observational retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"T. Kiruthika, T. Jayanthy\",\"doi\":\"10.18231/j.ijogr.2024.046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": To study the prevalence of intraabdominal adhesion in repeat CS and evaluate the maternal and fetal outcome.: CS is a lifesaving procedure for the mother and fetus, but have multiple complications like adhesions, abdominal pain, prolonged duration of surgery, postoperative bleeding, and identification of these can help improve maternal and fetal outcome and care.: This retrospective study reviewed 70 pregnant women undergoing repeat CS. Data was tabulated and analyzed and adhesions were scored based on a system into dense and flimsy, and its dimensions. Chi Square test was used to observe association. P-value<0.05 was taken as significant.: Adhesions were noted in 30(42.9%) of the subjects and 40(57.1%) patients had no adhesions. Dense adhesions were noted in 19(27.1%) and flimsy in 11(15.7%) patients. Among those with adhesions – 6(20%) had atonic postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). No association was noted with fetal outcome. There was a statistically significant increase in duration of surgery in those with adhesions – 126.83 minutes +/- 19.85 than in those without adhesions – 82.35 minutes +/-12.82. Those patients with dense adhesions, the duration of surgery was – 132.63 minutes +/-21.88 and with flimsy adhesions – 116.82 minutes +/-82.: Repeat CS with adhesions increased the duration of surgery, increased the chances of PPH and had no statistically significant effect on neonatal outcome. Furthermore, duration of surgery was prolonged with dense adhesions. Further research can be done including post operative complications, details of prior CS and interpregnancy interval and thereby adhesion prevalence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijogr.2024.046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijogr.2024.046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

:目的:研究重复CS中腹腔内粘连的发生率,并评估孕产妇和胎儿的结局:CS是挽救母亲和胎儿生命的手术,但也有多种并发症,如粘连、腹痛、手术时间延长、术后出血等:这项回顾性研究回顾了 70 名再次接受剖腹产手术的孕妇。对数据进行了制表和分析,并根据系统将粘连分为致密和松散两类及其尺寸进行评分。采用卡方检验来观察相关性。P值<0.05为显著:30(42.9%)名受试者出现粘连,40(57.1%)名患者无粘连。19(27.1%)名患者出现致密粘连,11(15.7%)名患者出现松散粘连。在有粘连的患者中,有6人(20%)出现无张力产后出血(PPH)。未发现与胎儿结局有关。有粘连者的手术时间为 126.83 分钟 +/- 19.85 分钟,比无粘连者的 82.35 分钟 +/- 12.82 分钟明显增加。粘连致密的患者的手术时间为 - 132.63 分钟 +/-21.88,粘连不牢固的患者的手术时间为 - 116.82 分钟 +/-82:有粘连的重复 CS 会延长手术时间,增加发生 PPH 的几率,对新生儿预后没有统计学意义。此外,致密粘连会延长手术时间。可进一步开展研究,包括术后并发症、前次剖宫产的详细情况、妊娠间隔以及粘连发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevalence of intra-abdominal adhesions in patients undergoing repeat cesarean section: An observational retrospective study
: To study the prevalence of intraabdominal adhesion in repeat CS and evaluate the maternal and fetal outcome.: CS is a lifesaving procedure for the mother and fetus, but have multiple complications like adhesions, abdominal pain, prolonged duration of surgery, postoperative bleeding, and identification of these can help improve maternal and fetal outcome and care.: This retrospective study reviewed 70 pregnant women undergoing repeat CS. Data was tabulated and analyzed and adhesions were scored based on a system into dense and flimsy, and its dimensions. Chi Square test was used to observe association. P-value<0.05 was taken as significant.: Adhesions were noted in 30(42.9%) of the subjects and 40(57.1%) patients had no adhesions. Dense adhesions were noted in 19(27.1%) and flimsy in 11(15.7%) patients. Among those with adhesions – 6(20%) had atonic postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). No association was noted with fetal outcome. There was a statistically significant increase in duration of surgery in those with adhesions – 126.83 minutes +/- 19.85 than in those without adhesions – 82.35 minutes +/-12.82. Those patients with dense adhesions, the duration of surgery was – 132.63 minutes +/-21.88 and with flimsy adhesions – 116.82 minutes +/-82.: Repeat CS with adhesions increased the duration of surgery, increased the chances of PPH and had no statistically significant effect on neonatal outcome. Furthermore, duration of surgery was prolonged with dense adhesions. Further research can be done including post operative complications, details of prior CS and interpregnancy interval and thereby adhesion prevalence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The sequence of acrania–exencephaly–anencephaly (AEAS)- An infrequent case report Complications of placenta previa: A retrospective observational study at tertiary care hospital A comparative study between dinoprostone pessary and dinoprostone gel for induction of labor and neonatal outcome Behind the veil of anemia: Assessment of iron, folic acid, and vitamin B12 deficiencies and their association with red cell indices in anemic and non-anemic women Management of iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy in India: A review of current practices and challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1