{"title":"MT 2.0 应用的构造模型有效性评估","authors":"Amar Peshave","doi":"10.21741/9781644903131-203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. This paper demonstrates a methodology to discriminate between the performances of different material models within the framework of Material Testing 2.0, which consists in coupling heterogeneous test configurations, full-field measurements using for instance Digital Image Correlation (DIC) and inverse identification like the Virtual Fields Method (VFM). The methodology relies on using a set of different virtual fields for parameter identification with a selected model, and to evaluate the performance of the model. The paper illustrates this methodology on anisotropic metal plasticity.","PeriodicalId":515987,"journal":{"name":"Materials Research Proceedings","volume":"114 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constitutive model validity evaluation for MT 2.0 applications\",\"authors\":\"Amar Peshave\",\"doi\":\"10.21741/9781644903131-203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. This paper demonstrates a methodology to discriminate between the performances of different material models within the framework of Material Testing 2.0, which consists in coupling heterogeneous test configurations, full-field measurements using for instance Digital Image Correlation (DIC) and inverse identification like the Virtual Fields Method (VFM). The methodology relies on using a set of different virtual fields for parameter identification with a selected model, and to evaluate the performance of the model. The paper illustrates this methodology on anisotropic metal plasticity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":515987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Materials Research Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"114 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Materials Research Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644903131-203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials Research Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644903131-203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Constitutive model validity evaluation for MT 2.0 applications
Abstract. This paper demonstrates a methodology to discriminate between the performances of different material models within the framework of Material Testing 2.0, which consists in coupling heterogeneous test configurations, full-field measurements using for instance Digital Image Correlation (DIC) and inverse identification like the Virtual Fields Method (VFM). The methodology relies on using a set of different virtual fields for parameter identification with a selected model, and to evaluate the performance of the model. The paper illustrates this methodology on anisotropic metal plasticity.