注重结合实际的过程:质量管理过程工具和实践如何支持可持续发展

Max Rosvall, Ida Gremyr
{"title":"注重结合实际的过程:质量管理过程工具和实践如何支持可持续发展","authors":"Max Rosvall, Ida Gremyr","doi":"10.1108/tqm-11-2023-0378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeQuality management (QM) can support organisations in contributing to sustainable development. As a result of an expanding focus from customers towards stakeholders within QM, the perspectives to consider multiply. Understanding how practices and tools for process management are specifically affected by this increase in perspectives is key to creating the right conditions for improvement initiatives that support sustainable development.Design/methodology/approachThis paper constructs a typology wherein the use of process management practices and tools is described in nine distinguished system contexts. Inductive discrimination is used to differentiate the system contexts and different use cases for process practices and tools.FindingsUsing the system of systems grid (SOSG), mainstream business process management (BPM) practices are positioned in a simple unitary context, whilst sustainability challenges also involve more complex contexts. Addressing these challenges requires integrating new tools and methods from paradigms outside of traditional functionalist business process management practices.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper highlights the necessity to consider system contexts when developing feasible practices and tools for effective process management.Practical implicationsPractical implications are that quality practitioners aiming to exploit the potential in process management to support sustainability get support for planning and conducting process improvement initiatives aiming to consider several stakeholder perspectives.Originality/valueThis paper presents a new typology for understanding the context of QM process initiatives and BPM in light of a contemporary sustainability focus.","PeriodicalId":508533,"journal":{"name":"The TQM Journal","volume":" 28","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Focus on processes contextualised: how QM process tools and practices can support sustainable development\",\"authors\":\"Max Rosvall, Ida Gremyr\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/tqm-11-2023-0378\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeQuality management (QM) can support organisations in contributing to sustainable development. As a result of an expanding focus from customers towards stakeholders within QM, the perspectives to consider multiply. Understanding how practices and tools for process management are specifically affected by this increase in perspectives is key to creating the right conditions for improvement initiatives that support sustainable development.Design/methodology/approachThis paper constructs a typology wherein the use of process management practices and tools is described in nine distinguished system contexts. Inductive discrimination is used to differentiate the system contexts and different use cases for process practices and tools.FindingsUsing the system of systems grid (SOSG), mainstream business process management (BPM) practices are positioned in a simple unitary context, whilst sustainability challenges also involve more complex contexts. Addressing these challenges requires integrating new tools and methods from paradigms outside of traditional functionalist business process management practices.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper highlights the necessity to consider system contexts when developing feasible practices and tools for effective process management.Practical implicationsPractical implications are that quality practitioners aiming to exploit the potential in process management to support sustainability get support for planning and conducting process improvement initiatives aiming to consider several stakeholder perspectives.Originality/valueThis paper presents a new typology for understanding the context of QM process initiatives and BPM in light of a contemporary sustainability focus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The TQM Journal\",\"volume\":\" 28\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The TQM Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/tqm-11-2023-0378\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The TQM Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tqm-11-2023-0378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 质量管理(QM)可以帮助组织促进可持续发展。由于质量管理的关注点从客户扩展到利益相关者,需要考虑的角度也成倍增加。了解流程管理的实践和工具如何受到视角增加的具体影响,是为支持可持续发展的改进措施创造适当条件的关键。利用系统网格(SOSG),主流业务流程管理(BPM)实践被定位在一个简单的单元环境中,而可持续性挑战还涉及更复杂的环境。要应对这些挑战,就必须整合传统功能主义业务流程管理实践范式之外的新工具和方法。实践意义实践意义在于,旨在挖掘流程管理潜力以支持可持续发展的质量从业人员在规划和实施流程改进计划时,应考虑多个利益相关者的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Focus on processes contextualised: how QM process tools and practices can support sustainable development
PurposeQuality management (QM) can support organisations in contributing to sustainable development. As a result of an expanding focus from customers towards stakeholders within QM, the perspectives to consider multiply. Understanding how practices and tools for process management are specifically affected by this increase in perspectives is key to creating the right conditions for improvement initiatives that support sustainable development.Design/methodology/approachThis paper constructs a typology wherein the use of process management practices and tools is described in nine distinguished system contexts. Inductive discrimination is used to differentiate the system contexts and different use cases for process practices and tools.FindingsUsing the system of systems grid (SOSG), mainstream business process management (BPM) practices are positioned in a simple unitary context, whilst sustainability challenges also involve more complex contexts. Addressing these challenges requires integrating new tools and methods from paradigms outside of traditional functionalist business process management practices.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper highlights the necessity to consider system contexts when developing feasible practices and tools for effective process management.Practical implicationsPractical implications are that quality practitioners aiming to exploit the potential in process management to support sustainability get support for planning and conducting process improvement initiatives aiming to consider several stakeholder perspectives.Originality/valueThis paper presents a new typology for understanding the context of QM process initiatives and BPM in light of a contemporary sustainability focus.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing Industry 4.0 implementation maturity in manufacturing MSMEs – a graph theory and matrix-based approach Assessing Lean Six Sigma and quality performance improvement in Italian public healthcare organizations: a validated scale Application of an approach integrating the Kano model and the fuzzy systems theory: a strategic analysis of consumer satisfaction scores The impact of TQM on financial and non-financial performance: the mediating role of corporate social responsibility A novel framework for understanding the interplay between the mobile wallet service quality dimensions and loyalty intention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1