{"title":"西斯拉夫语的反身性模式","authors":"Martina Ivanová","doi":"10.1075/lic.00039.iva","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The aim of this paper is to analyse differences in reflexive coding in Slovak, Czech and Polish and to evaluate\n the factors responsible for using phonologically more or less complex reflexive markers. To address this issue, we looked at\n preferred reflexive coding strategies in Slovak, Czech, and Polish, relying on data extracted from InterCorp multilingual corpus.\n The results are then verified by data from monolingual corpora of investigated languages for one semantic group of verbs labelled\n as ‘Prevarication’ in FrameNet. The results show that semantic frame underlying the meaning of lexical items cannot be the only\n possible explanation for distribution of reflexive markers but there are also other semantic, syntactic and pragmatic factors\n playing a pivotal role in reflexive coding strategies, often unique for a given language.","PeriodicalId":43502,"journal":{"name":"Languages in Contrast","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflexivity patterns in West-Slavic languages\",\"authors\":\"Martina Ivanová\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/lic.00039.iva\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The aim of this paper is to analyse differences in reflexive coding in Slovak, Czech and Polish and to evaluate\\n the factors responsible for using phonologically more or less complex reflexive markers. To address this issue, we looked at\\n preferred reflexive coding strategies in Slovak, Czech, and Polish, relying on data extracted from InterCorp multilingual corpus.\\n The results are then verified by data from monolingual corpora of investigated languages for one semantic group of verbs labelled\\n as ‘Prevarication’ in FrameNet. The results show that semantic frame underlying the meaning of lexical items cannot be the only\\n possible explanation for distribution of reflexive markers but there are also other semantic, syntactic and pragmatic factors\\n playing a pivotal role in reflexive coding strategies, often unique for a given language.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Languages in Contrast\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Languages in Contrast\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.00039.iva\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Languages in Contrast","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.00039.iva","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The aim of this paper is to analyse differences in reflexive coding in Slovak, Czech and Polish and to evaluate
the factors responsible for using phonologically more or less complex reflexive markers. To address this issue, we looked at
preferred reflexive coding strategies in Slovak, Czech, and Polish, relying on data extracted from InterCorp multilingual corpus.
The results are then verified by data from monolingual corpora of investigated languages for one semantic group of verbs labelled
as ‘Prevarication’ in FrameNet. The results show that semantic frame underlying the meaning of lexical items cannot be the only
possible explanation for distribution of reflexive markers but there are also other semantic, syntactic and pragmatic factors
playing a pivotal role in reflexive coding strategies, often unique for a given language.
期刊介绍：
Languages in Contrast aims to publish contrastive studies of two or more languages. Any aspect of language may be covered, including vocabulary, phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, pragmatics, text and discourse, stylistics, sociolinguistics and psycholinguistics. Languages in Contrast welcomes interdisciplinary studies, particularly those that make links between contrastive linguistics and translation, lexicography, computational linguistics, language teaching, literary and linguistic computing, literary studies and cultural studies.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
