Romain Pinquié, Lionel Roucoules, P. Yvars, Raphaël Chenouard
{"title":"基于社区的开放式科学设计研究基准的可操作性:应用于基于模型的架构设计合成","authors":"Romain Pinquié, Lionel Roucoules, P. Yvars, Raphaël Chenouard","doi":"10.1017/pds.2024.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The point has repeatedly been made that validation is a crucial success factor in demonstrating the scientific contribution and ensuring the adoption of results. Still, researchers in design science validate their research findings too infrequently. We must all evaluate our claimed contributions on open benchmarks to improve validation quality and foster cumulative research. In this paper, we propose a meta-model to standardise and operationalise the concept of open scientific benchmarks in design science and to guide communities of researchers in the co-development of scientific benchmarks.","PeriodicalId":489438,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Design Society","volume":"2007 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Operationalizing community-based open scientific design research benchmarks: application to model-based architecture design synthesis\",\"authors\":\"Romain Pinquié, Lionel Roucoules, P. Yvars, Raphaël Chenouard\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/pds.2024.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The point has repeatedly been made that validation is a crucial success factor in demonstrating the scientific contribution and ensuring the adoption of results. Still, researchers in design science validate their research findings too infrequently. We must all evaluate our claimed contributions on open benchmarks to improve validation quality and foster cumulative research. In this paper, we propose a meta-model to standardise and operationalise the concept of open scientific benchmarks in design science and to guide communities of researchers in the co-development of scientific benchmarks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":489438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Design Society\",\"volume\":\"2007 24\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Design Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2024.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Design Society","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2024.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Operationalizing community-based open scientific design research benchmarks: application to model-based architecture design synthesis
The point has repeatedly been made that validation is a crucial success factor in demonstrating the scientific contribution and ensuring the adoption of results. Still, researchers in design science validate their research findings too infrequently. We must all evaluate our claimed contributions on open benchmarks to improve validation quality and foster cumulative research. In this paper, we propose a meta-model to standardise and operationalise the concept of open scientific benchmarks in design science and to guide communities of researchers in the co-development of scientific benchmarks.