基于社区的开放式科学设计研究基准的可操作性:应用于基于模型的架构设计合成

Romain Pinquié, Lionel Roucoules, P. Yvars, Raphaël Chenouard
{"title":"基于社区的开放式科学设计研究基准的可操作性:应用于基于模型的架构设计合成","authors":"Romain Pinquié, Lionel Roucoules, P. Yvars, Raphaël Chenouard","doi":"10.1017/pds.2024.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The point has repeatedly been made that validation is a crucial success factor in demonstrating the scientific contribution and ensuring the adoption of results. Still, researchers in design science validate their research findings too infrequently. We must all evaluate our claimed contributions on open benchmarks to improve validation quality and foster cumulative research. In this paper, we propose a meta-model to standardise and operationalise the concept of open scientific benchmarks in design science and to guide communities of researchers in the co-development of scientific benchmarks.","PeriodicalId":489438,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Design Society","volume":"2007 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Operationalizing community-based open scientific design research benchmarks: application to model-based architecture design synthesis\",\"authors\":\"Romain Pinquié, Lionel Roucoules, P. Yvars, Raphaël Chenouard\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/pds.2024.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The point has repeatedly been made that validation is a crucial success factor in demonstrating the scientific contribution and ensuring the adoption of results. Still, researchers in design science validate their research findings too infrequently. We must all evaluate our claimed contributions on open benchmarks to improve validation quality and foster cumulative research. In this paper, we propose a meta-model to standardise and operationalise the concept of open scientific benchmarks in design science and to guide communities of researchers in the co-development of scientific benchmarks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":489438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Design Society\",\"volume\":\"2007 24\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Design Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2024.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Design Society","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2024.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们一再指出,验证是证明科学贡献和确保成果被采纳的关键成功因素。然而,设计科学研究人员对其研究成果进行验证的次数仍然太少。我们都必须根据公开的基准来评估我们声称的贡献,以提高验证质量,促进研究的积累。在本文中,我们提出了一个元模型,以规范和操作设计科学中的开放式科学基准概念,并指导研究人员群体共同开发科学基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Operationalizing community-based open scientific design research benchmarks: application to model-based architecture design synthesis
The point has repeatedly been made that validation is a crucial success factor in demonstrating the scientific contribution and ensuring the adoption of results. Still, researchers in design science validate their research findings too infrequently. We must all evaluate our claimed contributions on open benchmarks to improve validation quality and foster cumulative research. In this paper, we propose a meta-model to standardise and operationalise the concept of open scientific benchmarks in design science and to guide communities of researchers in the co-development of scientific benchmarks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Designing lab-on-a-chip systems with attribute dependency graphs Implementing an open innovation process in the premium marine industry Variability in complex product/system design: case study in automotive industry Computing solution spaces for gear box design Machine learning-based virtual sensors for reduced energy consumption in frost-free refrigerators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1