医疗保健专业人员与癌症幸存者合作中的人生目标领域、特质和设定过程:范围综述》。

Progress in rehabilitation medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2490/prm.20240018
Katsuma Ikeuchi, Seiji Nishida, Mari Karikawa
{"title":"医疗保健专业人员与癌症幸存者合作中的人生目标领域、特质和设定过程:范围综述》。","authors":"Katsuma Ikeuchi, Seiji Nishida, Mari Karikawa","doi":"10.2490/prm.20240018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>: This study aimed to describe the classification of goal domains, goal traits, and the goal-setting process as revealed by previous life goal-setting practices of healthcare professionals collaborating with cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>: The design was a scoping review. The MEDLINE, Academic Search Premier, and CINAHL databases were searched and mapped for papers with descriptions of goal domains, goal traits, and the goal-setting process. Goal domains were classified as life goals that were health-related, psychological, social, achievement-related, and leisure goals. Goal traits were classified based on specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and timed (SMART) criteria. The goal-setting process was classified based on the frameworks of goal-setting phases (preparation, formulation, follow-up) and their components.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>: In total, 229 papers were identified, and 24 papers were included in the final analysis. All papers included health-related goals, followed by psychological and social goals. All goal domains were included in 41.7% of the papers. Relevant goals were the most common and timed goals were the least common. All papers included either of the components that comprise the preparation or formulation phases. We found that 12.5% of papers did not include any of the three components of the follow-up phase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>: The life goals collaboratively set between cancer survivors and healthcare professionals were characterized by the following: psychological and social goal domains, numerous goal domains, more relevant goals and fewer timed goals, low proportion of patient education in the preparation phase, and high proportion of evaluation of progress or achievement in the follow-up phase.</p>","PeriodicalId":74584,"journal":{"name":"Progress in rehabilitation medicine","volume":"9 ","pages":"20240018"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11102924/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Life Goal Domains, Traits, and Setting Process in the Collaboration between Healthcare Professionals and Cancer Survivors: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Katsuma Ikeuchi, Seiji Nishida, Mari Karikawa\",\"doi\":\"10.2490/prm.20240018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>: This study aimed to describe the classification of goal domains, goal traits, and the goal-setting process as revealed by previous life goal-setting practices of healthcare professionals collaborating with cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>: The design was a scoping review. The MEDLINE, Academic Search Premier, and CINAHL databases were searched and mapped for papers with descriptions of goal domains, goal traits, and the goal-setting process. Goal domains were classified as life goals that were health-related, psychological, social, achievement-related, and leisure goals. Goal traits were classified based on specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and timed (SMART) criteria. The goal-setting process was classified based on the frameworks of goal-setting phases (preparation, formulation, follow-up) and their components.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>: In total, 229 papers were identified, and 24 papers were included in the final analysis. All papers included health-related goals, followed by psychological and social goals. All goal domains were included in 41.7% of the papers. Relevant goals were the most common and timed goals were the least common. All papers included either of the components that comprise the preparation or formulation phases. We found that 12.5% of papers did not include any of the three components of the follow-up phase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>: The life goals collaboratively set between cancer survivors and healthcare professionals were characterized by the following: psychological and social goal domains, numerous goal domains, more relevant goals and fewer timed goals, low proportion of patient education in the preparation phase, and high proportion of evaluation of progress or achievement in the follow-up phase.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in rehabilitation medicine\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"20240018\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11102924/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in rehabilitation medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2490/prm.20240018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2490/prm.20240018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在描述目标领域的分类、目标特征以及医护人员在与癌症幸存者合作制定生活目标的过程中发现的目标制定过程:方法::设计了一个范围综述。我们在 MEDLINE、Academic Search Premier 和 CINAHL 数据库中搜索并映射了有关目标领域、目标特征和目标设定过程的论文。目标领域分为与健康相关的生活目标、心理目标、社会目标、成就目标和休闲目标。目标特征根据具体、可衡量、可实现、相关和有时间限制(SMART)的标准进行分类。目标设定过程根据目标设定阶段(准备、制定、跟进)及其组成部分的框架进行分类:共发现 229 篇论文,其中 24 篇被纳入最终分析。所有论文都包括与健康相关的目标,其次是心理和社会目标。41.7%的论文包含所有目标领域。相关目标最常见,定时目标最不常见。所有论文都包含了准备阶段或制定阶段的任何一个组成部分。我们发现,12.5% 的论文未包含后续阶段三个组成部分中的任何一个:癌症幸存者与医护人员合作制定的生活目标具有以下特点:心理和社会目标领域、目标领域多、相关目标多、定时目标少、准备阶段的患者教育比例低、后续阶段的进展或成就评估比例高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Life Goal Domains, Traits, and Setting Process in the Collaboration between Healthcare Professionals and Cancer Survivors: A Scoping Review.

Objectives: : This study aimed to describe the classification of goal domains, goal traits, and the goal-setting process as revealed by previous life goal-setting practices of healthcare professionals collaborating with cancer survivors.

Methods: : The design was a scoping review. The MEDLINE, Academic Search Premier, and CINAHL databases were searched and mapped for papers with descriptions of goal domains, goal traits, and the goal-setting process. Goal domains were classified as life goals that were health-related, psychological, social, achievement-related, and leisure goals. Goal traits were classified based on specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and timed (SMART) criteria. The goal-setting process was classified based on the frameworks of goal-setting phases (preparation, formulation, follow-up) and their components.

Results: : In total, 229 papers were identified, and 24 papers were included in the final analysis. All papers included health-related goals, followed by psychological and social goals. All goal domains were included in 41.7% of the papers. Relevant goals were the most common and timed goals were the least common. All papers included either of the components that comprise the preparation or formulation phases. We found that 12.5% of papers did not include any of the three components of the follow-up phase.

Conclusions: : The life goals collaboratively set between cancer survivors and healthcare professionals were characterized by the following: psychological and social goal domains, numerous goal domains, more relevant goals and fewer timed goals, low proportion of patient education in the preparation phase, and high proportion of evaluation of progress or achievement in the follow-up phase.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Delayed Postoperative Rehabilitation on Patients with Valvular Heart Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study. The Relationship between Physical Function and Quality of Life in Elderly People Requiring Long-term Care. Preoperative Posterior Pelvic Tilt Angle is Associated with Decreased Gait Speed and Hip Function in Older Patients with Hip Osteoarthritis. Refractory Severe Anti-SRP Myopathy that Improved with Long-term Rehabilitation Therapy: A Case Report. Therapeutic Intervention for Trunk Control Impairments in Central Nervous System Disorders: A Comprehensive Review of Methods and Efficacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1