血管内主动脉瓣修复术后对比增强超声检测内腔积液疗效的单中心回顾性研究

Akash D. Nijhawan, Austin J. Pourmoussa, Bradley R. Fox, Samuel A. Salazar, Charles J. Lugo, Muhammad Hasan, James F. Benenati, Brian J. Schiro
{"title":"血管内主动脉瓣修复术后对比增强超声检测内腔积液疗效的单中心回顾性研究","authors":"Akash D. Nijhawan, Austin J. Pourmoussa, Bradley R. Fox, Samuel A. Salazar, Charles J. Lugo, Muhammad Hasan, James F. Benenati, Brian J. Schiro","doi":"10.1177/15443167241246116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Surveillance for endoleak after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with computed tomography angiography has the associated risks of radiation exposure and nephrotoxic contrast agents. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the detection of endoleak post–endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed evaluating patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with endovascular aortic aneurysm repair between October 29, 2017 and April 21, 2021 and follow-up imaging with both computed tomography angiography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. The sample included 35 imaging combinations in 28 patients. Positive and negative results for detection of endoleak by contrast-enhanced ultrasound were tabulated as true positive, false positive, true negative, and false negative compared to computed tomography angiography and conventional angiography. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound were calculated. Out of 35 imaging combinations, endoleak was detected in 24 cases by computed tomography angiography and in 23 cases by contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Using computed tomography angiography as the reference standard, contrast-enhanced ultrasound yielded 96% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value, and 92% negative predictive value for endoleak detection. In the 23 cases of endoleak detection by both contrast-enhanced ultrasound and computed tomography angiography, contrast-enhanced ultrasound discerned the correct endoleak type in all 23 cases, while computed tomography angiography identified the correct endoleak type in 20 cases ( P = .2333). Endoleak detection by contrast-enhanced ultrasound appears at least equivalent to computed tomography angiography. Some of the advantages of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the surveillance of endoleak after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair include an avoidance of radiation, elimination of nephrotoxic contrast agents, reduction in costs, real-time imaging, discerning flow directionality, and visualizing endoleaks in regions previously embolized with coils/plugs/liquid embolic agents. Limitations include operator dependence and variables that obscure the visual field including obese body habitus. With these advantages and excellent comparison data, contrast-enhanced ultrasound should be considered as a first-line imaging modality for long-term surveillance of endoleaks after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is a safe and viable option for long-term surveillance post–endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.","PeriodicalId":52510,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Vascular Ultrasound","volume":"75 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-Center Retrospective Study on the Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Detection of Endoleak After Endovascular Aortic Repair\",\"authors\":\"Akash D. Nijhawan, Austin J. Pourmoussa, Bradley R. Fox, Samuel A. Salazar, Charles J. Lugo, Muhammad Hasan, James F. Benenati, Brian J. Schiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15443167241246116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Surveillance for endoleak after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with computed tomography angiography has the associated risks of radiation exposure and nephrotoxic contrast agents. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the detection of endoleak post–endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed evaluating patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with endovascular aortic aneurysm repair between October 29, 2017 and April 21, 2021 and follow-up imaging with both computed tomography angiography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. The sample included 35 imaging combinations in 28 patients. Positive and negative results for detection of endoleak by contrast-enhanced ultrasound were tabulated as true positive, false positive, true negative, and false negative compared to computed tomography angiography and conventional angiography. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound were calculated. Out of 35 imaging combinations, endoleak was detected in 24 cases by computed tomography angiography and in 23 cases by contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Using computed tomography angiography as the reference standard, contrast-enhanced ultrasound yielded 96% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value, and 92% negative predictive value for endoleak detection. In the 23 cases of endoleak detection by both contrast-enhanced ultrasound and computed tomography angiography, contrast-enhanced ultrasound discerned the correct endoleak type in all 23 cases, while computed tomography angiography identified the correct endoleak type in 20 cases ( P = .2333). Endoleak detection by contrast-enhanced ultrasound appears at least equivalent to computed tomography angiography. Some of the advantages of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the surveillance of endoleak after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair include an avoidance of radiation, elimination of nephrotoxic contrast agents, reduction in costs, real-time imaging, discerning flow directionality, and visualizing endoleaks in regions previously embolized with coils/plugs/liquid embolic agents. Limitations include operator dependence and variables that obscure the visual field including obese body habitus. With these advantages and excellent comparison data, contrast-enhanced ultrasound should be considered as a first-line imaging modality for long-term surveillance of endoleaks after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is a safe and viable option for long-term surveillance post–endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Vascular Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\"75 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Vascular Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15443167241246116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Vascular Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15443167241246116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用计算机断层扫描血管造影术对血管内主动脉瘤修补术后的内漏进行监测有辐射照射和肾毒性造影剂的相关风险。本研究旨在评估造影剂增强超声在检测血管内主动脉瘤修复术后内漏方面的性能。该研究是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,评估了2017年10月29日至2021年4月21日期间接受血管内主动脉瘤修补术治疗的腹主动脉瘤患者,并通过计算机断层扫描血管造影和造影剂增强超声进行了随访成像。样本包括 28 名患者的 35 种成像组合。与计算机断层扫描血管造影和传统血管造影相比,造影剂增强超声检测内漏的阳性和阴性结果以真阳性、假阳性、真阴性和假阴性列表。计算了对比增强超声的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。在 35 种成像组合中,24 例通过计算机断层扫描血管造影术检测到内漏,23 例通过造影剂增强超声波检测到内漏。以计算机断层扫描血管造影作为参考标准,对比增强超声波检测内漏的敏感性为 96%,特异性为 100%,阳性预测值为 100%,阴性预测值为 92%。在造影剂增强超声和计算机断层扫描血管造影同时检测到内漏的 23 个病例中,造影剂增强超声在所有 23 个病例中都能识别出正确的内漏类型,而计算机断层扫描血管造影则在 20 个病例中识别出了正确的内漏类型 ( P = .2333)。对比增强超声检测内漏的效果至少与计算机断层扫描血管造影相当。造影剂增强超声在血管内主动脉瘤修补术后监测内漏方面的一些优势包括:避免辐射、无需使用肾毒性造影剂、降低成本、实时成像、辨别血流方向性以及观察之前用线圈/插头/液体栓塞剂栓塞区域的内漏。其局限性包括对操作者的依赖性和遮挡视野的变量,包括肥胖体型。有了这些优点和出色的对比数据,对比增强超声应被视为血管内主动脉瘤修复术后长期监测内漏的一线成像模式。对比增强超声是血管内主动脉瘤修补术后长期监测的一种安全可行的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Single-Center Retrospective Study on the Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Detection of Endoleak After Endovascular Aortic Repair
Surveillance for endoleak after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with computed tomography angiography has the associated risks of radiation exposure and nephrotoxic contrast agents. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the detection of endoleak post–endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed evaluating patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with endovascular aortic aneurysm repair between October 29, 2017 and April 21, 2021 and follow-up imaging with both computed tomography angiography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. The sample included 35 imaging combinations in 28 patients. Positive and negative results for detection of endoleak by contrast-enhanced ultrasound were tabulated as true positive, false positive, true negative, and false negative compared to computed tomography angiography and conventional angiography. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound were calculated. Out of 35 imaging combinations, endoleak was detected in 24 cases by computed tomography angiography and in 23 cases by contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Using computed tomography angiography as the reference standard, contrast-enhanced ultrasound yielded 96% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value, and 92% negative predictive value for endoleak detection. In the 23 cases of endoleak detection by both contrast-enhanced ultrasound and computed tomography angiography, contrast-enhanced ultrasound discerned the correct endoleak type in all 23 cases, while computed tomography angiography identified the correct endoleak type in 20 cases ( P = .2333). Endoleak detection by contrast-enhanced ultrasound appears at least equivalent to computed tomography angiography. Some of the advantages of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the surveillance of endoleak after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair include an avoidance of radiation, elimination of nephrotoxic contrast agents, reduction in costs, real-time imaging, discerning flow directionality, and visualizing endoleaks in regions previously embolized with coils/plugs/liquid embolic agents. Limitations include operator dependence and variables that obscure the visual field including obese body habitus. With these advantages and excellent comparison data, contrast-enhanced ultrasound should be considered as a first-line imaging modality for long-term surveillance of endoleaks after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is a safe and viable option for long-term surveillance post–endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Vascular Ultrasound
Journal for Vascular Ultrasound Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
The Thrill is Gone Indirect Duplex Ultrasound Diagnosis of Innominate Artery Occlusive Disease Fibromuscular Dysplasia in Vascular Ultrasound Relationship Between Diameter and Pelvic Vein Reflux Single-Center Retrospective Study on the Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Detection of Endoleak After Endovascular Aortic Repair
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1