膝关节骨性关节炎患者放射学进展和疼痛进展的预测模型:来自 FNIH OA 生物标记物联盟项目的数据

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Arthritis Research & Therapy Pub Date : 2024-05-30 DOI:10.1186/s13075-024-03346-1
Xiaoyu Li, Chunpu Li, Peng Zhang
{"title":"膝关节骨性关节炎患者放射学进展和疼痛进展的预测模型:来自 FNIH OA 生物标记物联盟项目的数据","authors":"Xiaoyu Li, Chunpu Li, Peng Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s13075-024-03346-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The progression of knee osteoarthritis (OA) can be defined as either radiographic progression or pain progression. This study aimed to construct models to predict radiographic progression and pain progression in patients with knee OA. We retrieved data from the FNIH OA Biomarkers Consortium project, a nested case-control study. A total of 600 subjects with mild to moderate OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade of 1, 2, or 3) in one target knee were enrolled. The patients were classified as radiographic progressors (n = 297), non-radiographic progressors (n = 303), pain progressors (n = 297), or non-pain progressors (n = 303) according to the change in the minimum joint space width of the medial compartment and the WOMAC pain score during the follow-up period of 24–48 months. Initially, 376 variables concerning demographics, clinical questionnaires, imaging measurements, and biochemical markers were included. We developed predictive models based on multivariate logistic regression analysis and visualized the models with nomograms. We also tested whether adding changes in predictors from baseline to 24 months would improve the predictive efficacy of the models. The predictive models of radiographic progression and pain progression consisted of 8 and 10 variables, respectively, with area under curve (AUC) values of 0.77 and 0.76, respectively. Incorporating the change in the WOMAC pain score from baseline to 24 months into the pain progression predictive model significantly improved the predictive effectiveness (AUC = 0.86). We identified risk factors for imaging progression and pain progression in patients with knee OA over a 2- to 4-year period, and provided effective predictive models, which could help identify patients at high risk of progression.","PeriodicalId":8419,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Research & Therapy","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive models of radiographic progression and pain progression in patients with knee osteoarthritis: data from the FNIH OA biomarkers consortium project\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoyu Li, Chunpu Li, Peng Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13075-024-03346-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The progression of knee osteoarthritis (OA) can be defined as either radiographic progression or pain progression. This study aimed to construct models to predict radiographic progression and pain progression in patients with knee OA. We retrieved data from the FNIH OA Biomarkers Consortium project, a nested case-control study. A total of 600 subjects with mild to moderate OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade of 1, 2, or 3) in one target knee were enrolled. The patients were classified as radiographic progressors (n = 297), non-radiographic progressors (n = 303), pain progressors (n = 297), or non-pain progressors (n = 303) according to the change in the minimum joint space width of the medial compartment and the WOMAC pain score during the follow-up period of 24–48 months. Initially, 376 variables concerning demographics, clinical questionnaires, imaging measurements, and biochemical markers were included. We developed predictive models based on multivariate logistic regression analysis and visualized the models with nomograms. We also tested whether adding changes in predictors from baseline to 24 months would improve the predictive efficacy of the models. The predictive models of radiographic progression and pain progression consisted of 8 and 10 variables, respectively, with area under curve (AUC) values of 0.77 and 0.76, respectively. Incorporating the change in the WOMAC pain score from baseline to 24 months into the pain progression predictive model significantly improved the predictive effectiveness (AUC = 0.86). We identified risk factors for imaging progression and pain progression in patients with knee OA over a 2- to 4-year period, and provided effective predictive models, which could help identify patients at high risk of progression.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthritis Research & Therapy\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthritis Research & Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-024-03346-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-024-03346-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

膝关节骨性关节炎(OA)的进展可定义为影像学进展或疼痛进展。本研究旨在构建膝关节OA患者的放射学进展和疼痛进展预测模型。我们从 FNIH OA 生物标志物联盟项目(一项巢式病例对照研究)中获取了数据。我们共招募了600名患有轻度至中度膝关节OA(Kellgren-Lawrence分级为1、2或3级)的受试者。根据随访24-48个月期间内侧室最小关节间隙宽度和WOMAC疼痛评分的变化,将患者分为影像学进展者(n = 297)、非影像学进展者(n = 303)、疼痛进展者(n = 297)或非疼痛进展者(n = 303)。最初,我们纳入了有关人口统计学、临床问卷调查、影像学测量和生化指标的 376 个变量。我们根据多变量逻辑回归分析建立了预测模型,并用提名图直观显示了模型。我们还测试了添加从基线到 24 个月的预测因子变化是否会提高模型的预测效果。放射学进展和疼痛进展的预测模型分别由 8 个和 10 个变量组成,其曲线下面积 (AUC) 值分别为 0.77 和 0.76。将 WOMAC 疼痛评分从基线到 24 个月的变化纳入疼痛进展预测模型可显著提高预测效果(AUC = 0.86)。我们确定了膝关节OA患者在2至4年期间影像学进展和疼痛进展的风险因素,并提供了有效的预测模型,有助于识别高风险进展患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictive models of radiographic progression and pain progression in patients with knee osteoarthritis: data from the FNIH OA biomarkers consortium project
The progression of knee osteoarthritis (OA) can be defined as either radiographic progression or pain progression. This study aimed to construct models to predict radiographic progression and pain progression in patients with knee OA. We retrieved data from the FNIH OA Biomarkers Consortium project, a nested case-control study. A total of 600 subjects with mild to moderate OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade of 1, 2, or 3) in one target knee were enrolled. The patients were classified as radiographic progressors (n = 297), non-radiographic progressors (n = 303), pain progressors (n = 297), or non-pain progressors (n = 303) according to the change in the minimum joint space width of the medial compartment and the WOMAC pain score during the follow-up period of 24–48 months. Initially, 376 variables concerning demographics, clinical questionnaires, imaging measurements, and biochemical markers were included. We developed predictive models based on multivariate logistic regression analysis and visualized the models with nomograms. We also tested whether adding changes in predictors from baseline to 24 months would improve the predictive efficacy of the models. The predictive models of radiographic progression and pain progression consisted of 8 and 10 variables, respectively, with area under curve (AUC) values of 0.77 and 0.76, respectively. Incorporating the change in the WOMAC pain score from baseline to 24 months into the pain progression predictive model significantly improved the predictive effectiveness (AUC = 0.86). We identified risk factors for imaging progression and pain progression in patients with knee OA over a 2- to 4-year period, and provided effective predictive models, which could help identify patients at high risk of progression.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.00%
发文量
261
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1999, Arthritis Research and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed journal, publishing original articles in the area of musculoskeletal research and therapy as well as, reviews, commentaries and reports. A major focus of the journal is on the immunologic processes leading to inflammation, damage and repair as they relate to autoimmune rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions, and which inform the translation of this knowledge into advances in clinical care. Original basic, translational and clinical research is considered for publication along with results of early and late phase therapeutic trials, especially as they pertain to the underpinning science that informs clinical observations in interventional studies.
期刊最新文献
Gout-associated SNP at the IL1RN-IL1F10 region is associated with altered cytokine production in PBMCs of patients with gout and controls Semaphorin 5A promotes Th17 differentiation via PI3K-Akt-mTOR in systemic lupus erythematosus Automatic knee osteoarthritis severity grading based on X-ray images using a hierarchical classification method. Correlation between circulating cell-free mitochondrial DNA content and severity of knee degeneration in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study. Therapeutic effects of extracellular vesicles derived from mesenchymal stem cells primed with disease-conditioned-immune cells in systemic lupus erythematosus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1