解读《人类通论》:1960-61 年墨尔本天主教报刊上的进化论争论 *

IF 0.3 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS HISTORY Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1111/1467-9809.13060
Joel Barnes
{"title":"解读《人类通论》:1960-61 年墨尔本天主教报刊上的进化论争论 *","authors":"Joel Barnes","doi":"10.1111/1467-9809.13060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>From mid-1960 to early 1961, the Melbourne Catholic weekly newspaper <i>The Advocate</i> carried an extended controversy on evolutionary science and its compatibility with the teachings of the Church. An intra-denominational debate among Catholic scientists, clergy and laymen, the controversy was shaped by the theological framework of Pope Pius XII's encyclical <i>Humani Generis</i> (1950), which included the first ever papal statement on evolution. As a grassroots debate in which official Catholic policy as outlined in the encyclical was open to interpretation by competing interests, the controversy serves as an index of the ambiguities of <i>Humani Generis</i>, and of the uncertainties of wider Church policy at the time, regarding evolutionary science and human evolution in particular. The article considers the <i>Advocate</i> controversy and its immediate aftermath within the context of <i>Humani Generis</i>'s strictures on human evolution, and within the longer history of Catholic responses to and engagement with evolutionary science.</p>","PeriodicalId":44035,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS HISTORY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-9809.13060","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interpreting Humani Generis: The Evolution Controversy in the Melbourne Catholic Press, 1960–61*\",\"authors\":\"Joel Barnes\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-9809.13060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>From mid-1960 to early 1961, the Melbourne Catholic weekly newspaper <i>The Advocate</i> carried an extended controversy on evolutionary science and its compatibility with the teachings of the Church. An intra-denominational debate among Catholic scientists, clergy and laymen, the controversy was shaped by the theological framework of Pope Pius XII's encyclical <i>Humani Generis</i> (1950), which included the first ever papal statement on evolution. As a grassroots debate in which official Catholic policy as outlined in the encyclical was open to interpretation by competing interests, the controversy serves as an index of the ambiguities of <i>Humani Generis</i>, and of the uncertainties of wider Church policy at the time, regarding evolutionary science and human evolution in particular. The article considers the <i>Advocate</i> controversy and its immediate aftermath within the context of <i>Humani Generis</i>'s strictures on human evolution, and within the longer history of Catholic responses to and engagement with evolutionary science.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS HISTORY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-9809.13060\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9809.13060\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9809.13060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从 1960 年中到 1961 年初,墨尔本天主教周报《倡导者》(The Advocate)就进化科学及其与教会教义的兼容性展开了广泛的争论。这是一场天主教科学家、神职人员和信徒之间的教派内辩论,教皇庇护十二世(Pius XII)的通谕《人类通论》(Humani Generis,1950 年)是这场辩论的神学框架,其中包括教皇关于进化论的首次声明。作为一场草根辩论,通谕中概述的天主教官方政策可由相互竞争的利益集团进行解释,这场争论是《人类通谕》模棱两可的索引,也是当时更广泛的教会政策,特别是关于进化科学和人类进化的不确定性的索引。文章从《人类通论》对人类进化论的严格规定,以及天主教对进化科学的回应和参与的更长历史中,探讨了倡导者之争及其直接后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interpreting Humani Generis: The Evolution Controversy in the Melbourne Catholic Press, 1960–61*

From mid-1960 to early 1961, the Melbourne Catholic weekly newspaper The Advocate carried an extended controversy on evolutionary science and its compatibility with the teachings of the Church. An intra-denominational debate among Catholic scientists, clergy and laymen, the controversy was shaped by the theological framework of Pope Pius XII's encyclical Humani Generis (1950), which included the first ever papal statement on evolution. As a grassroots debate in which official Catholic policy as outlined in the encyclical was open to interpretation by competing interests, the controversy serves as an index of the ambiguities of Humani Generis, and of the uncertainties of wider Church policy at the time, regarding evolutionary science and human evolution in particular. The article considers the Advocate controversy and its immediate aftermath within the context of Humani Generis's strictures on human evolution, and within the longer history of Catholic responses to and engagement with evolutionary science.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Journal of Religious History is a vital source of high quality information for all those interested in the place of religion in history. The Journal reviews current work on the history of religions and their relationship with all aspects of human experience. With high quality international contributors, the journal explores religion and its related subjects, along with debates on comparative method and theory in religious history.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information FrancesTanzer, Vanishing Vienna: Modernism, Philosemitism and Jews in a Postwar City. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2024; pp. Xii + 252 LydiaCabrera: El Monte: Notes on the Religions, Magic, Superstitions, and Folklore of the Black and Creole People of Cuba. Translated by David Font‐Navarrete. Durham: Duke University Press, 2023; pp. 589. GuJun: Samuel Wells Williams: A Critical Biography. Jinan: Shandong Educational Press, 2023; pp. 398. Holly CrawfordPickett: The Drama of Serial Conversion in Early Modern England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2024; pp. x + 264.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1