清洁和肮脏加密货币之间的共泡沫传输:网络和投资组合分析

IF 2.8 2区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of International Money and Finance Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2024.103108
Yan Chen , Lei Zhang , Elie Bouri
{"title":"清洁和肮脏加密货币之间的共泡沫传输:网络和投资组合分析","authors":"Yan Chen ,&nbsp;Lei Zhang ,&nbsp;Elie Bouri","doi":"10.1016/j.jimonfin.2024.103108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study proposes a co-bubble network to capture the transmission of co-bubbles across the prices of 37 cryptocurrencies from both static and dynamic perspectives. It considers the periods of the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russo-Ukrainian conflict, and distinguishes clean from dirty cryptocurrencies. The main findings are summarized as follows: Firstly, larger cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and BNB, have a higher probability of generating co-bubbles in other cryptocurrencies, indicating a strong interdependence among them. Secondly, the co-bubble network experiences notable changes around crisis events, with distinct characteristics observed during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the Russo-Ukrainian conflict. Thirdly, the transmission of co-bubble influence exhibits time-varying characteristics, and centrality rankings of influential cryptocurrencies vary around the crises. Particularly, after the COVID-19 pandemic, Bitcoin and BNB experience a decline in centrality ranking, while smaller-cap cryptocurrencies show higher centrality rankings, suggesting the transmission of co-bubble effects from large to smaller cryptocurrencies. The centrality rankings of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and BNB show a contrasting pattern, maintaining higher levels in the ongoing post Russo-Ukrainian conflict period. Fourthly, different patterns of co-bubble transmission exist for dirty and clean groups, with dirty cryptocurrencies showing a much higher intensity of co-bubbles during the Russo-Ukrainian conflict. Finally, the portfolio analysis shows that co-bubble network centrality-driven portfolios outperform the baseline portfolio strategy, dirty group portfolio strategy, and clean group portfolio strategy, during the entire sample period and particularly the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings are useful for the decision making of cryptocurrency portfolio managers and policymakers concerned with the behaviour of influential cryptocurrencies and potential risks inferences.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48331,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Money and Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-Bubble transmission across clean and dirty Cryptocurrencies: Network and portfolio analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yan Chen ,&nbsp;Lei Zhang ,&nbsp;Elie Bouri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jimonfin.2024.103108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study proposes a co-bubble network to capture the transmission of co-bubbles across the prices of 37 cryptocurrencies from both static and dynamic perspectives. It considers the periods of the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russo-Ukrainian conflict, and distinguishes clean from dirty cryptocurrencies. The main findings are summarized as follows: Firstly, larger cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and BNB, have a higher probability of generating co-bubbles in other cryptocurrencies, indicating a strong interdependence among them. Secondly, the co-bubble network experiences notable changes around crisis events, with distinct characteristics observed during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the Russo-Ukrainian conflict. Thirdly, the transmission of co-bubble influence exhibits time-varying characteristics, and centrality rankings of influential cryptocurrencies vary around the crises. Particularly, after the COVID-19 pandemic, Bitcoin and BNB experience a decline in centrality ranking, while smaller-cap cryptocurrencies show higher centrality rankings, suggesting the transmission of co-bubble effects from large to smaller cryptocurrencies. The centrality rankings of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and BNB show a contrasting pattern, maintaining higher levels in the ongoing post Russo-Ukrainian conflict period. Fourthly, different patterns of co-bubble transmission exist for dirty and clean groups, with dirty cryptocurrencies showing a much higher intensity of co-bubbles during the Russo-Ukrainian conflict. Finally, the portfolio analysis shows that co-bubble network centrality-driven portfolios outperform the baseline portfolio strategy, dirty group portfolio strategy, and clean group portfolio strategy, during the entire sample period and particularly the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings are useful for the decision making of cryptocurrency portfolio managers and policymakers concerned with the behaviour of influential cryptocurrencies and potential risks inferences.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Money and Finance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Money and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261560624000950\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Money and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261560624000950","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究提出了一个共同泡沫网络,从静态和动态两个角度捕捉共同泡沫在 37 种加密货币价格中的传播。它考虑了 COVID-19 大流行和俄乌冲突时期,并区分了干净和肮脏的加密货币。主要发现总结如下:首先,比特币、以太坊和 BNB 等较大型加密货币在其他加密货币中产生共生泡沫的概率较高,这表明它们之间存在很强的相互依赖关系。其次,共生泡沫网络在危机事件前后会发生显著变化,与俄乌冲突相比,在 COVID-19 大流行期间观察到的共生泡沫网络具有明显特征。第三,共生泡沫影响力的传播呈现出时变特征,有影响力的加密货币的中心性排名在危机前后会有所不同。特别是在 COVID-19 大流行后,比特币和 BNB 的中心性排名下降,而小市值加密货币的中心性排名较高,这表明共泡沫效应从大型加密货币向小型加密货币传递。比特币、以太坊和 BNB 的中心性排名呈现出相反的模式,在俄乌冲突后的持续时期保持较高水平。第四,"肮脏 "和 "干净 "群体存在不同的共生泡沫传播模式,在俄乌冲突期间,"肮脏 "加密货币的共生泡沫强度要高得多。最后,投资组合分析显示,在整个样本期间,尤其是在 COVID-19 大流行期间,共泡沫网络中心性驱动的投资组合表现优于基线投资组合策略、肮脏群体投资组合策略和干净群体投资组合策略。这些发现对加密货币投资组合经理的决策以及关注有影响力的加密货币行为和潜在风险推断的政策制定者很有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Co-Bubble transmission across clean and dirty Cryptocurrencies: Network and portfolio analysis

This study proposes a co-bubble network to capture the transmission of co-bubbles across the prices of 37 cryptocurrencies from both static and dynamic perspectives. It considers the periods of the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russo-Ukrainian conflict, and distinguishes clean from dirty cryptocurrencies. The main findings are summarized as follows: Firstly, larger cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and BNB, have a higher probability of generating co-bubbles in other cryptocurrencies, indicating a strong interdependence among them. Secondly, the co-bubble network experiences notable changes around crisis events, with distinct characteristics observed during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the Russo-Ukrainian conflict. Thirdly, the transmission of co-bubble influence exhibits time-varying characteristics, and centrality rankings of influential cryptocurrencies vary around the crises. Particularly, after the COVID-19 pandemic, Bitcoin and BNB experience a decline in centrality ranking, while smaller-cap cryptocurrencies show higher centrality rankings, suggesting the transmission of co-bubble effects from large to smaller cryptocurrencies. The centrality rankings of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and BNB show a contrasting pattern, maintaining higher levels in the ongoing post Russo-Ukrainian conflict period. Fourthly, different patterns of co-bubble transmission exist for dirty and clean groups, with dirty cryptocurrencies showing a much higher intensity of co-bubbles during the Russo-Ukrainian conflict. Finally, the portfolio analysis shows that co-bubble network centrality-driven portfolios outperform the baseline portfolio strategy, dirty group portfolio strategy, and clean group portfolio strategy, during the entire sample period and particularly the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings are useful for the decision making of cryptocurrency portfolio managers and policymakers concerned with the behaviour of influential cryptocurrencies and potential risks inferences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
141
期刊介绍: Since its launch in 1982, Journal of International Money and Finance has built up a solid reputation as a high quality scholarly journal devoted to theoretical and empirical research in the fields of international monetary economics, international finance, and the rapidly developing overlap area between the two. Researchers in these areas, and financial market professionals too, pay attention to the articles that the journal publishes. Authors published in the journal are in the forefront of scholarly research on exchange rate behaviour, foreign exchange options, international capital markets, international monetary and fiscal policy, international transmission and related questions.
期刊最新文献
Green vs. brown: Climate risk showdown – who’s thriving, who’s diving? COVID-19 and redemptions from Irish-resident bond funds Gas price shocks and euro area inflation Asymmetry and non-linearity in exchange rate pass-through: Evidence from scanner data ETFs and tail dependence: Evidence from Chinese stock market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1