天然气存储预测:群众更聪明吗?

Adrian Fernández-Pérez, Alexandre Garel, Ivan Indriawan
{"title":"天然气存储预测:群众更聪明吗?","authors":"Adrian Fernández-Pérez, Alexandre Garel, Ivan Indriawan","doi":"10.5547/01956574.41.5.afer","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the usefulness of crowdsourced relative to professional forecasts for natural gas storage changes. We find that crowdsourced forecasts are less accurate than professional forecasts on average. We investigate possible reasons for this inferior performance and find evidence of a greater divergence of opinions and a lower incorporation of publicly available information among crowd analysts. We further show that crowdsourced consensus forecast does not influence the market’s expectation of gas storage changes beyond what is already contained in professional consensus forecast, suggesting that crowdsourced forecasts provide little new information. Overall, our results indicate that the incremental usefulness of crowdsourced forecasts for gas market stakeholders is very limited.","PeriodicalId":501567,"journal":{"name":"The Energy Journal","volume":" 40","pages":"1 - 26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Natural Gas Storage Forecasts: Is the Crowd Wiser?\",\"authors\":\"Adrian Fernández-Pérez, Alexandre Garel, Ivan Indriawan\",\"doi\":\"10.5547/01956574.41.5.afer\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the usefulness of crowdsourced relative to professional forecasts for natural gas storage changes. We find that crowdsourced forecasts are less accurate than professional forecasts on average. We investigate possible reasons for this inferior performance and find evidence of a greater divergence of opinions and a lower incorporation of publicly available information among crowd analysts. We further show that crowdsourced consensus forecast does not influence the market’s expectation of gas storage changes beyond what is already contained in professional consensus forecast, suggesting that crowdsourced forecasts provide little new information. Overall, our results indicate that the incremental usefulness of crowdsourced forecasts for gas market stakeholders is very limited.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Energy Journal\",\"volume\":\" 40\",\"pages\":\"1 - 26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Energy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.41.5.afer\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Energy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.41.5.afer","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文研究了众包预测相对于专业预测对天然气储存变化的作用。我们发现,众包预测的平均准确度低于专业预测。我们研究了造成这种较差表现的可能原因,发现有证据表明,众包分析师的意见分歧较大,对公开信息的吸收程度较低。我们进一步发现,众包共识预测并没有影响市场对储气变化的预期,超出了专业共识预测的范围,这表明众包预测几乎没有提供新的信息。总之,我们的研究结果表明,众包预测对天然气市场利益相关者的增量作用非常有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Natural Gas Storage Forecasts: Is the Crowd Wiser?
This paper examines the usefulness of crowdsourced relative to professional forecasts for natural gas storage changes. We find that crowdsourced forecasts are less accurate than professional forecasts on average. We investigate possible reasons for this inferior performance and find evidence of a greater divergence of opinions and a lower incorporation of publicly available information among crowd analysts. We further show that crowdsourced consensus forecast does not influence the market’s expectation of gas storage changes beyond what is already contained in professional consensus forecast, suggesting that crowdsourced forecasts provide little new information. Overall, our results indicate that the incremental usefulness of crowdsourced forecasts for gas market stakeholders is very limited.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Offshore Market Design in Integrated Energy systems: A Case Study on the North Sea Region towards 2050 Drilling Deeper: Non-Linear, Non-Parametric Natural Gas Price and Volatility Forecasting Book Review: Petroleum Resource Management in Africa, Lessons from Ten Years of Oil and Gas Production in Ghana Congestion Risk, Transmission Rights, and Investment Equilibria in Electricity Markets Frequent Auctions for Intraday Electricity Markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1