前瞻性随机干预研究:玻璃体切割术后面朝下体位和非面朝下体位与保留眼窝内缘膜剥离术和空气填塞术治疗近视性眼底病伴眼窝脱离的比较

Ke Zhu , Boya Lei , Fang Song , Rui Jiang , Qing Chang , Gezhi Xu
{"title":"前瞻性随机干预研究:玻璃体切割术后面朝下体位和非面朝下体位与保留眼窝内缘膜剥离术和空气填塞术治疗近视性眼底病伴眼窝脱离的比较","authors":"Ke Zhu ,&nbsp;Boya Lei ,&nbsp;Fang Song ,&nbsp;Rui Jiang ,&nbsp;Qing Chang ,&nbsp;Gezhi Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.ajoint.2024.100036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To compare the anatomical and visual outcomes after vitrectomy with facedown (FD) or non-FD positions for treating myopic foveoschisis (MF) with foveal detachment.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Prospective, randomized interventional study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>55 eyes with MF and foveal detachment that underwent vitrectomy with fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and air tamponade were randomized to either the postoperative FD (26 eyes) or non-FD (29 eyes) positions. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography were assessed at baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after vitrectomy with fovea-sparing ILM peeling and air tamponade with the FD or non-FD positions. Logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to study correlations between clinical factors and foveoschisis resolution and postoperative BCVA.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All patients completed ≥6 months of follow-up. MF and foveal detachment were completely resolved in 22 eyes (92 %) in the FD group and 22 eyes (76 %) in the non-FD group (<em>P</em> = 0.160). Macular hole-associated retinal detachment occurred in one eye in the FD (4 %) and non-FD (3 %) groups. The postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 6 months did not differ significantly between the two groups (<em>P</em> = 0.495). The BCVA improved by ≥0.3 logMAR in 14 eyes (58 %) in the FD group versus 17 eyes (59 %) in the non-FD group (<em>P</em> = 0.983). Central foveal thickness (CFT) and height of foveal detachment were significantly associated with foveoschisis resolution (<em>P</em> = 0.045 and 0.039, respectively). Better preoperative BCVA and foveoschisis resolution were significantly associated with better postoperative BCVA (<em>P</em> = 0.031 and 0.003, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The non-FD position appeared to be as effective as the FD position after vitrectomy with fovea-sparing ILM peeling and air tamponade for treating MF with foveal detachment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100071,"journal":{"name":"AJO International","volume":"1 2","pages":"Article 100036"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000364/pdfft?md5=4287fdd4dd68809ab1887f43c8b1a98d&pid=1-s2.0-S2950253524000364-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of facedown and non-facedown positions after vitrectomy with fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling and air tamponade for treating myopic foveoschisis with foveal detachment: A prospective, randomized interventional study\",\"authors\":\"Ke Zhu ,&nbsp;Boya Lei ,&nbsp;Fang Song ,&nbsp;Rui Jiang ,&nbsp;Qing Chang ,&nbsp;Gezhi Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajoint.2024.100036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To compare the anatomical and visual outcomes after vitrectomy with facedown (FD) or non-FD positions for treating myopic foveoschisis (MF) with foveal detachment.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Prospective, randomized interventional study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>55 eyes with MF and foveal detachment that underwent vitrectomy with fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and air tamponade were randomized to either the postoperative FD (26 eyes) or non-FD (29 eyes) positions. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography were assessed at baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after vitrectomy with fovea-sparing ILM peeling and air tamponade with the FD or non-FD positions. Logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to study correlations between clinical factors and foveoschisis resolution and postoperative BCVA.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All patients completed ≥6 months of follow-up. MF and foveal detachment were completely resolved in 22 eyes (92 %) in the FD group and 22 eyes (76 %) in the non-FD group (<em>P</em> = 0.160). Macular hole-associated retinal detachment occurred in one eye in the FD (4 %) and non-FD (3 %) groups. The postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 6 months did not differ significantly between the two groups (<em>P</em> = 0.495). The BCVA improved by ≥0.3 logMAR in 14 eyes (58 %) in the FD group versus 17 eyes (59 %) in the non-FD group (<em>P</em> = 0.983). Central foveal thickness (CFT) and height of foveal detachment were significantly associated with foveoschisis resolution (<em>P</em> = 0.045 and 0.039, respectively). Better preoperative BCVA and foveoschisis resolution were significantly associated with better postoperative BCVA (<em>P</em> = 0.031 and 0.003, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The non-FD position appeared to be as effective as the FD position after vitrectomy with fovea-sparing ILM peeling and air tamponade for treating MF with foveal detachment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJO International\",\"volume\":\"1 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100036\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000364/pdfft?md5=4287fdd4dd68809ab1887f43c8b1a98d&pid=1-s2.0-S2950253524000364-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJO International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000364\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJO International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较采用面朝下(FD)或非FD体位进行玻璃体切除术治疗近视性眼窝裂孔(MF)伴眼窝脱离后的解剖学和视觉结果。方法55只眼患MF伴眼窝脱离并接受了玻璃体切除术,同时进行了保留眼窝的内层限界膜(ILM)剥离和空气填塞,这些眼被随机分配到术后FD体位(26只眼)或非FD体位(29只眼)。最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和光学相干断层扫描分别在玻璃体切割术后基线、2周、3个月和6个月进行了评估,并采用FD或非FD体位进行了保留眼窝的ILM剥离和空气填塞。对临床因素与眼窝裂解和术后BCVA之间的相关性进行了逻辑和线性回归分析。在 FD 组和非 FD 组中,分别有 22 只眼睛(92%)和 22 只眼睛(76%)的 MF 和眼窝脱离完全消除(P = 0.160)。在 FD 组(4%)和非 FD 组(3%)中,有一只眼睛发生了黄斑孔相关性视网膜脱离。两组患者术后 6 个月的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)无显著差异(P = 0.495)。FD组有14只眼睛(58%)的BCVA提高了≥0.3 logMAR,而非FD组有17只眼睛(59%)的BCVA提高了≥0.3 logMAR(P = 0.983)。中心眼窝厚度(CFT)和眼窝脱离高度与眼窝裂解显著相关(P = 0.045 和 0.039)。结论在进行玻璃体切除术,同时进行疏通眼窝的ILM剥离和气囊填塞术治疗伴有眼窝脱离的MF时,非FD体位似乎与FD体位一样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of facedown and non-facedown positions after vitrectomy with fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling and air tamponade for treating myopic foveoschisis with foveal detachment: A prospective, randomized interventional study

Purpose

To compare the anatomical and visual outcomes after vitrectomy with facedown (FD) or non-FD positions for treating myopic foveoschisis (MF) with foveal detachment.

Design

Prospective, randomized interventional study.

Methods

55 eyes with MF and foveal detachment that underwent vitrectomy with fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and air tamponade were randomized to either the postoperative FD (26 eyes) or non-FD (29 eyes) positions. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography were assessed at baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after vitrectomy with fovea-sparing ILM peeling and air tamponade with the FD or non-FD positions. Logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to study correlations between clinical factors and foveoschisis resolution and postoperative BCVA.

Results

All patients completed ≥6 months of follow-up. MF and foveal detachment were completely resolved in 22 eyes (92 %) in the FD group and 22 eyes (76 %) in the non-FD group (P = 0.160). Macular hole-associated retinal detachment occurred in one eye in the FD (4 %) and non-FD (3 %) groups. The postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 6 months did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.495). The BCVA improved by ≥0.3 logMAR in 14 eyes (58 %) in the FD group versus 17 eyes (59 %) in the non-FD group (P = 0.983). Central foveal thickness (CFT) and height of foveal detachment were significantly associated with foveoschisis resolution (P = 0.045 and 0.039, respectively). Better preoperative BCVA and foveoschisis resolution were significantly associated with better postoperative BCVA (P = 0.031 and 0.003, respectively).

Conclusions

The non-FD position appeared to be as effective as the FD position after vitrectomy with fovea-sparing ILM peeling and air tamponade for treating MF with foveal detachment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intravitreal dexamethasone implant concomitant to cataract surgery in retinitis pigmentosa: potential retinal preservation effect FaceFinder: A machine learning tool for identification of facial images from heterogenous datasets Gender based differences in electronic medical record utilization in an academic ophthalmology practice Evolving practice patterns of young retinal specialists: A five-year comparison of treatment and surgical preferences Candida parapsilosis keratitis: A case series
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1