{"title":"单侧唇腭裂患者鼻腔美学参数评估 - 一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Daphane Anishya, Shweta Nagesh","doi":"10.1177/10556656241261908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess and compare the deviating nasal cephalometric parameters of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) with a control group. The study also aims to correlate the deviating cephalometric parameters with two aesthetic scoring systems.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Dental college and hospital.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Pre-treatment lateral cephalograms and extra oral photographs of 20 adult patients with repaired UCLP presenting for orthodontic treatment. 20 patients with age and type of malocclusion matched control were selected.</p><p><strong>Main outcome: </strong>The nasal cephalometric parameters of patients with UCLP and a control group were compared. The nasolabial region of patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) was scored using Asher McDade Aesthetic Index (AMAI) and Cleft Aesthetic Rating Scale (CARS). The scoring was done by six different groups assessors to study their perception of the nasolabial region. Correlation between cephalometric parameters and the aesthetic scores was done.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found significant differences in nasal length (<i>P</i> = .003) and depth (<i>P</i> < .001) between UCLP and the non-cleft control group. In the aesthetic assessment, orthodontist gave the least scores, while layman group scored the highest. The CARS nose aesthetic scores showed statistically significant high, negative correlation with the nasal length (<i>P</i> = .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cephalometric parameters and the aesthetic indices can be aid the orthodontists in the assessment of nasolabial aesthetics and additionally refer for further definitive rhinoplasty to improve the patient's overall facial aesthetics.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Nasal Aesthetic Parameters in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate - A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Daphane Anishya, Shweta Nagesh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656241261908\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess and compare the deviating nasal cephalometric parameters of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) with a control group. The study also aims to correlate the deviating cephalometric parameters with two aesthetic scoring systems.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Dental college and hospital.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Pre-treatment lateral cephalograms and extra oral photographs of 20 adult patients with repaired UCLP presenting for orthodontic treatment. 20 patients with age and type of malocclusion matched control were selected.</p><p><strong>Main outcome: </strong>The nasal cephalometric parameters of patients with UCLP and a control group were compared. The nasolabial region of patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) was scored using Asher McDade Aesthetic Index (AMAI) and Cleft Aesthetic Rating Scale (CARS). The scoring was done by six different groups assessors to study their perception of the nasolabial region. Correlation between cephalometric parameters and the aesthetic scores was done.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found significant differences in nasal length (<i>P</i> = .003) and depth (<i>P</i> < .001) between UCLP and the non-cleft control group. In the aesthetic assessment, orthodontist gave the least scores, while layman group scored the highest. The CARS nose aesthetic scores showed statistically significant high, negative correlation with the nasal length (<i>P</i> = .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cephalometric parameters and the aesthetic indices can be aid the orthodontists in the assessment of nasolabial aesthetics and additionally refer for further definitive rhinoplasty to improve the patient's overall facial aesthetics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241261908\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241261908","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的评估并比较单侧唇腭裂（UCLP）患者与对照组的鼻部偏差头形测量参数。研究还旨在将偏离的头形测量参数与两种美学评分系统进行关联：设计：回顾性研究：地点：牙医学院和医院：20名接受正畸治疗的修复性UCLP成人患者的治疗前侧头影和口外照片。选取 20 名年龄和错颌畸形类型相匹配的患者作为对照：主要结果：比较了 UCLP 患者和对照组的鼻头测量参数。使用阿舍-麦克戴德美学指数（AMAI）和唇腭裂美学评分量表（CARS）对唇腭裂患者的鼻唇部进行评分。评分由六组不同的评估人员完成，以研究他们对鼻唇沟区域的感知。头测量参数与美学评分之间存在相关性：研究发现鼻长度（P = .003）和深度（P P = .01）存在明显差异：结论：头测量参数和美学指数可帮助正畸医生评估鼻唇美学，并进一步转诊进行明确的鼻整形手术，以改善患者的整体面部美学。
Assessment of Nasal Aesthetic Parameters in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate - A Retrospective Study.
Objectives: To assess and compare the deviating nasal cephalometric parameters of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) with a control group. The study also aims to correlate the deviating cephalometric parameters with two aesthetic scoring systems.
Design: A retrospective study.
Setting: Dental college and hospital.
Participants: Pre-treatment lateral cephalograms and extra oral photographs of 20 adult patients with repaired UCLP presenting for orthodontic treatment. 20 patients with age and type of malocclusion matched control were selected.
Main outcome: The nasal cephalometric parameters of patients with UCLP and a control group were compared. The nasolabial region of patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) was scored using Asher McDade Aesthetic Index (AMAI) and Cleft Aesthetic Rating Scale (CARS). The scoring was done by six different groups assessors to study their perception of the nasolabial region. Correlation between cephalometric parameters and the aesthetic scores was done.
Results: The study found significant differences in nasal length (P = .003) and depth (P < .001) between UCLP and the non-cleft control group. In the aesthetic assessment, orthodontist gave the least scores, while layman group scored the highest. The CARS nose aesthetic scores showed statistically significant high, negative correlation with the nasal length (P = .01).
Conclusion: The cephalometric parameters and the aesthetic indices can be aid the orthodontists in the assessment of nasolabial aesthetics and additionally refer for further definitive rhinoplasty to improve the patient's overall facial aesthetics.
期刊介绍：
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
