箱高重要吗?箱高对男女箱跳成绩的影响比较分析。

Q1 Health Professions International journal of exercise science Pub Date : 2024-05-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Marcel Lopes Dos Santos, Jocarol Shields, Ricardo Berton, Taylor Dinyer-McNeely, Michael Trevino, Olivia Anderson, J Jay Dawes
{"title":"箱高重要吗?箱高对男女箱跳成绩的影响比较分析。","authors":"Marcel Lopes Dos Santos, Jocarol Shields, Ricardo Berton, Taylor Dinyer-McNeely, Michael Trevino, Olivia Anderson, J Jay Dawes","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to analyze the effect of box height on box jump performance among recreationally active college students. Fourteen males (age = 20.8 ± 4.1 years, height = 178.3 ± 6.3 cm, weight = 82.3 ± 13.0 kg) and seventeen females (age = 20.8 ± 2.1 years, height = 167.1 ± 5.5 cm, weight = 64.5 ± 7.4 kg) completed box jumps at five different box heights that corresponded to 0, 20, 40, 60, and 80% of their maximal box jump height. Variables of interest included peak force, rate of force development, peak rate of force development, peak power, velocity at peak power, jump height, time to take-off, and reactive strength index modified. Peak force at 80% maximal box jump was significantly higher than 0% in the female cohort (<i>p</i> = 0.001). No significant differences for any of the other variables were observed in males, or at any other height lower than the 80% maximal box jump height for females (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Overall, variations in box height did not influence box jump performance in recreationally trained individuals when the intent to perform a maximal-effort jump was emphasized. This is important for strength and conditioning coaches and trainers, as they can utilize boxes of varied heights when teaching proper landing techniques to novice athletes with no decrements in propulsive performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"17 1","pages":"720-729"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11166134/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Box Height Matter? A Comparative Analysis of Box Height on Box Jump Performance in Men and Women.\",\"authors\":\"Marcel Lopes Dos Santos, Jocarol Shields, Ricardo Berton, Taylor Dinyer-McNeely, Michael Trevino, Olivia Anderson, J Jay Dawes\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to analyze the effect of box height on box jump performance among recreationally active college students. Fourteen males (age = 20.8 ± 4.1 years, height = 178.3 ± 6.3 cm, weight = 82.3 ± 13.0 kg) and seventeen females (age = 20.8 ± 2.1 years, height = 167.1 ± 5.5 cm, weight = 64.5 ± 7.4 kg) completed box jumps at five different box heights that corresponded to 0, 20, 40, 60, and 80% of their maximal box jump height. Variables of interest included peak force, rate of force development, peak rate of force development, peak power, velocity at peak power, jump height, time to take-off, and reactive strength index modified. Peak force at 80% maximal box jump was significantly higher than 0% in the female cohort (<i>p</i> = 0.001). No significant differences for any of the other variables were observed in males, or at any other height lower than the 80% maximal box jump height for females (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Overall, variations in box height did not influence box jump performance in recreationally trained individuals when the intent to perform a maximal-effort jump was emphasized. This is important for strength and conditioning coaches and trainers, as they can utilize boxes of varied heights when teaching proper landing techniques to novice athletes with no decrements in propulsive performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"720-729\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11166134/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在分析箱高对参加娱乐活动的大学生跳箱成绩的影响。14 名男生(年龄 = 20.8 ± 4.1 岁,身高 = 178.3 ± 6.3 厘米,体重 = 82.3 ± 13.0 千克)和 17 名女生(年龄 = 20.8 ± 2.1 岁,身高 = 167.1 ± 5.5 厘米,体重 = 64.5 ± 7.4 千克)分别在五种不同的跳箱高度下完成跳箱运动,跳箱高度分别为最大跳箱高度的 0%、20%、40%、60% 和 80%。研究变量包括峰值力量、力量发展速度、峰值力量发展速度、峰值力量、峰值力量时的速度、起跳高度、起跳时间和修正后的反应力量指数。在女性组群中,最大跳箱率为 80% 时的峰值力量明显高于 0% 时的峰值力量(p = 0.001)。在其他变量中,男性和女性在低于 80% 最大跳箱高度的其他高度均无明显差异(p > 0.05)。总体而言,在强调进行最大努力跳跃的情况下,箱高的变化不会影响休闲训练者的跳箱成绩。这对力量与体能教练和训练员来说非常重要,因为他们在向新手运动员传授正确的落地技术时,可以利用不同高度的跳箱,而不会降低推进性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does Box Height Matter? A Comparative Analysis of Box Height on Box Jump Performance in Men and Women.

This study aimed to analyze the effect of box height on box jump performance among recreationally active college students. Fourteen males (age = 20.8 ± 4.1 years, height = 178.3 ± 6.3 cm, weight = 82.3 ± 13.0 kg) and seventeen females (age = 20.8 ± 2.1 years, height = 167.1 ± 5.5 cm, weight = 64.5 ± 7.4 kg) completed box jumps at five different box heights that corresponded to 0, 20, 40, 60, and 80% of their maximal box jump height. Variables of interest included peak force, rate of force development, peak rate of force development, peak power, velocity at peak power, jump height, time to take-off, and reactive strength index modified. Peak force at 80% maximal box jump was significantly higher than 0% in the female cohort (p = 0.001). No significant differences for any of the other variables were observed in males, or at any other height lower than the 80% maximal box jump height for females (p > 0.05). Overall, variations in box height did not influence box jump performance in recreationally trained individuals when the intent to perform a maximal-effort jump was emphasized. This is important for strength and conditioning coaches and trainers, as they can utilize boxes of varied heights when teaching proper landing techniques to novice athletes with no decrements in propulsive performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Mental Fatigue Induced by the Stroop Test on Muscular Endurance Performance and Neuromuscular Activation in Division III Female Athletes. Validity, Reliability, and Sensitivity of a Commercially Available Velocity Measuring Device When Performing Selected Exercises. Effects of Different Warm-up Protocols on the Cardiopulmonary Responses to Exercise Testing in Youth. Relative Age Effect for Different Playing Positions in Adolescent Female Volleyball Players. A Comparison of Achilles Tendon Morphological Characteristics Based Upon VISA-A Score in Active Adults Over Age 50.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1