{"title":"探索胰腺移植后移植物胰腺炎的定义:范围界定综述","authors":"Stefano Partelli , Valentina Andreasi , Valentina Tomajer , Domenico Tamburrino , Rossana Caldara , Paolo Rigotti , Davide Catarinella , Lorenzo Piemonti , Massimo Falconi","doi":"10.1016/j.trre.2024.100861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite the clinical relevance of graft pancreatitis (GP) after pancreas transplantation (PT), a universally accepted definition is lacking. Aim of this scoping review was to provide a systematic overview of GP definitions reported in the literature. MEDLINE, Web of Science and Embase were searched for relevant articles. Prospective/retrospective studies reporting a GP definition were included. The included series (<em>n</em> = 20) used four main criteria (clinical, biochemical, radiological and pathological) to define GP. Overall, 9 studies defined GP using a single criterion (<em>n</em> = 8 biochemical, <em>n</em> = 1 pathological), 7 series using two criteria (<em>n</em> = 3 clinical + biochemical, <em>n</em> = 3 biochemical + radiological, <em>n</em> = 1 clinical + radiological), 3 series using three criteria (<em>n</em> = 3 clinical + biochemical + radiological), and 1 series using four criteria. Overall, 20 definitions of GP were found. GP rate was reported by 19 series and ranged between 0% and 87%. This scoping review confirms that a universally accepted definition of GP is absent, and there is no consensus on the criteria on which it should be grounded. Future research should focus on developing a validated definition of GP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48973,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Reviews","volume":"38 4","pages":"Article 100861"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring definitions of graft pancreatitis following pancreas transplantation: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Partelli , Valentina Andreasi , Valentina Tomajer , Domenico Tamburrino , Rossana Caldara , Paolo Rigotti , Davide Catarinella , Lorenzo Piemonti , Massimo Falconi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trre.2024.100861\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Despite the clinical relevance of graft pancreatitis (GP) after pancreas transplantation (PT), a universally accepted definition is lacking. Aim of this scoping review was to provide a systematic overview of GP definitions reported in the literature. MEDLINE, Web of Science and Embase were searched for relevant articles. Prospective/retrospective studies reporting a GP definition were included. The included series (<em>n</em> = 20) used four main criteria (clinical, biochemical, radiological and pathological) to define GP. Overall, 9 studies defined GP using a single criterion (<em>n</em> = 8 biochemical, <em>n</em> = 1 pathological), 7 series using two criteria (<em>n</em> = 3 clinical + biochemical, <em>n</em> = 3 biochemical + radiological, <em>n</em> = 1 clinical + radiological), 3 series using three criteria (<em>n</em> = 3 clinical + biochemical + radiological), and 1 series using four criteria. Overall, 20 definitions of GP were found. GP rate was reported by 19 series and ranged between 0% and 87%. This scoping review confirms that a universally accepted definition of GP is absent, and there is no consensus on the criteria on which it should be grounded. Future research should focus on developing a validated definition of GP.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation Reviews\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100861\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955470X24000442\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955470X24000442","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
尽管胰腺移植(PT)后的移植物胰腺炎(GP)与临床息息相关,但却缺乏一个普遍接受的定义。本综述旨在对文献中报道的 GP 定义进行系统性概述。检索了 MEDLINE、Web of Science 和 Embase 中的相关文章。纳入了报告 GP 定义的前瞻性/回顾性研究。纳入的系列研究(n = 20)采用了四种主要标准(临床、生化、放射和病理)来定义 GP。总体而言,9 项研究使用单一标准(n = 8 项生化标准,n = 1 项病理标准)定义 GP,7 项系列研究使用两项标准(n = 3 项临床标准 + 生化标准,n = 3 项生化标准 + 放射标准,n = 1 项临床标准 + 放射标准),3 项系列研究使用三项标准(n = 3 项临床标准 + 生化标准 + 放射标准),1 项系列研究使用四项标准。总体而言,共发现了 20 种 GP 定义。19个系列报告了GP率,介于0%和87%之间。此次范围界定审查证实,目前还没有一个普遍接受的 GP 定义,对于 GP 定义所应依据的标准也没有达成共识。未来的研究应侧重于制定 GP 的有效定义。
Exploring definitions of graft pancreatitis following pancreas transplantation: A scoping review
Despite the clinical relevance of graft pancreatitis (GP) after pancreas transplantation (PT), a universally accepted definition is lacking. Aim of this scoping review was to provide a systematic overview of GP definitions reported in the literature. MEDLINE, Web of Science and Embase were searched for relevant articles. Prospective/retrospective studies reporting a GP definition were included. The included series (n = 20) used four main criteria (clinical, biochemical, radiological and pathological) to define GP. Overall, 9 studies defined GP using a single criterion (n = 8 biochemical, n = 1 pathological), 7 series using two criteria (n = 3 clinical + biochemical, n = 3 biochemical + radiological, n = 1 clinical + radiological), 3 series using three criteria (n = 3 clinical + biochemical + radiological), and 1 series using four criteria. Overall, 20 definitions of GP were found. GP rate was reported by 19 series and ranged between 0% and 87%. This scoping review confirms that a universally accepted definition of GP is absent, and there is no consensus on the criteria on which it should be grounded. Future research should focus on developing a validated definition of GP.
期刊介绍:
Transplantation Reviews contains state-of-the-art review articles on both clinical and experimental transplantation. The journal features invited articles by authorities in immunology, transplantation medicine and surgery.