探索胰腺移植后移植物胰腺炎的定义:范围界定综述

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Transplantation Reviews Pub Date : 2024-06-08 DOI:10.1016/j.trre.2024.100861
Stefano Partelli , Valentina Andreasi , Valentina Tomajer , Domenico Tamburrino , Rossana Caldara , Paolo Rigotti , Davide Catarinella , Lorenzo Piemonti , Massimo Falconi
{"title":"探索胰腺移植后移植物胰腺炎的定义:范围界定综述","authors":"Stefano Partelli ,&nbsp;Valentina Andreasi ,&nbsp;Valentina Tomajer ,&nbsp;Domenico Tamburrino ,&nbsp;Rossana Caldara ,&nbsp;Paolo Rigotti ,&nbsp;Davide Catarinella ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Piemonti ,&nbsp;Massimo Falconi","doi":"10.1016/j.trre.2024.100861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite the clinical relevance of graft pancreatitis (GP) after pancreas transplantation (PT), a universally accepted definition is lacking. Aim of this scoping review was to provide a systematic overview of GP definitions reported in the literature. MEDLINE, Web of Science and Embase were searched for relevant articles. Prospective/retrospective studies reporting a GP definition were included. The included series (<em>n</em> = 20) used four main criteria (clinical, biochemical, radiological and pathological) to define GP. Overall, 9 studies defined GP using a single criterion (<em>n</em> = 8 biochemical, <em>n</em> = 1 pathological), 7 series using two criteria (<em>n</em> = 3 clinical + biochemical, <em>n</em> = 3 biochemical + radiological, <em>n</em> = 1 clinical + radiological), 3 series using three criteria (<em>n</em> = 3 clinical + biochemical + radiological), and 1 series using four criteria. Overall, 20 definitions of GP were found. GP rate was reported by 19 series and ranged between 0% and 87%. This scoping review confirms that a universally accepted definition of GP is absent, and there is no consensus on the criteria on which it should be grounded. Future research should focus on developing a validated definition of GP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48973,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Reviews","volume":"38 4","pages":"Article 100861"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring definitions of graft pancreatitis following pancreas transplantation: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Partelli ,&nbsp;Valentina Andreasi ,&nbsp;Valentina Tomajer ,&nbsp;Domenico Tamburrino ,&nbsp;Rossana Caldara ,&nbsp;Paolo Rigotti ,&nbsp;Davide Catarinella ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Piemonti ,&nbsp;Massimo Falconi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trre.2024.100861\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Despite the clinical relevance of graft pancreatitis (GP) after pancreas transplantation (PT), a universally accepted definition is lacking. Aim of this scoping review was to provide a systematic overview of GP definitions reported in the literature. MEDLINE, Web of Science and Embase were searched for relevant articles. Prospective/retrospective studies reporting a GP definition were included. The included series (<em>n</em> = 20) used four main criteria (clinical, biochemical, radiological and pathological) to define GP. Overall, 9 studies defined GP using a single criterion (<em>n</em> = 8 biochemical, <em>n</em> = 1 pathological), 7 series using two criteria (<em>n</em> = 3 clinical + biochemical, <em>n</em> = 3 biochemical + radiological, <em>n</em> = 1 clinical + radiological), 3 series using three criteria (<em>n</em> = 3 clinical + biochemical + radiological), and 1 series using four criteria. Overall, 20 definitions of GP were found. GP rate was reported by 19 series and ranged between 0% and 87%. This scoping review confirms that a universally accepted definition of GP is absent, and there is no consensus on the criteria on which it should be grounded. Future research should focus on developing a validated definition of GP.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation Reviews\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100861\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955470X24000442\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955470X24000442","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管胰腺移植(PT)后的移植物胰腺炎(GP)与临床息息相关,但却缺乏一个普遍接受的定义。本综述旨在对文献中报道的 GP 定义进行系统性概述。检索了 MEDLINE、Web of Science 和 Embase 中的相关文章。纳入了报告 GP 定义的前瞻性/回顾性研究。纳入的系列研究(n = 20)采用了四种主要标准(临床、生化、放射和病理)来定义 GP。总体而言,9 项研究使用单一标准(n = 8 项生化标准,n = 1 项病理标准)定义 GP,7 项系列研究使用两项标准(n = 3 项临床标准 + 生化标准,n = 3 项生化标准 + 放射标准,n = 1 项临床标准 + 放射标准),3 项系列研究使用三项标准(n = 3 项临床标准 + 生化标准 + 放射标准),1 项系列研究使用四项标准。总体而言,共发现了 20 种 GP 定义。19个系列报告了GP率,介于0%和87%之间。此次范围界定审查证实,目前还没有一个普遍接受的 GP 定义,对于 GP 定义所应依据的标准也没有达成共识。未来的研究应侧重于制定 GP 的有效定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring definitions of graft pancreatitis following pancreas transplantation: A scoping review

Despite the clinical relevance of graft pancreatitis (GP) after pancreas transplantation (PT), a universally accepted definition is lacking. Aim of this scoping review was to provide a systematic overview of GP definitions reported in the literature. MEDLINE, Web of Science and Embase were searched for relevant articles. Prospective/retrospective studies reporting a GP definition were included. The included series (n = 20) used four main criteria (clinical, biochemical, radiological and pathological) to define GP. Overall, 9 studies defined GP using a single criterion (n = 8 biochemical, n = 1 pathological), 7 series using two criteria (n = 3 clinical + biochemical, n = 3 biochemical + radiological, n = 1 clinical + radiological), 3 series using three criteria (n = 3 clinical + biochemical + radiological), and 1 series using four criteria. Overall, 20 definitions of GP were found. GP rate was reported by 19 series and ranged between 0% and 87%. This scoping review confirms that a universally accepted definition of GP is absent, and there is no consensus on the criteria on which it should be grounded. Future research should focus on developing a validated definition of GP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation Reviews
Transplantation Reviews IMMUNOLOGY-TRANSPLANTATION
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
40
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Transplantation Reviews contains state-of-the-art review articles on both clinical and experimental transplantation. The journal features invited articles by authorities in immunology, transplantation medicine and surgery.
期刊最新文献
Complement and complement regulatory protein in allogeneic and xenogeneic kidney transplantation Frailty serves as an adverse predictor for mortality in liver transplant candidates: A systematic review and meta-analysis Outcomes of kidney replacement therapies after kidney transplant failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in solid organ transplant recipients: Current therapeutic and screening strategies Factors and interventions affecting tacrolimus intrapatient variability: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1