社会因素导致群体与个体避免碰撞的不对称

Adrien Gregorj, Zeynep Yücel, F. Zanlungo, Takayuki Kanda
{"title":"社会因素导致群体与个体避免碰撞的不对称","authors":"Adrien Gregorj, Zeynep Yücel, F. Zanlungo, Takayuki Kanda","doi":"10.17815/cd.2024.150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research centers on analyzing frontal encounters between dyads (two-person groups) and individuals, aiming to measure each participant's role in avoiding collisions based on their deviation from their intended path. To achieve this, we establish the intended trajectory of each party by taking into account their walking direction leading up to the encounter. The largest discrepancy between this intended path and the observed path can be interpreted as the pedestrian's maximum lateral deviation.We show a noteworthy discrepancy in deviation between group members and individuals in face-to-face encounters. Furthermore, we conduct an in-depth analysis of how the intensity of interaction among group members impacts collision avoidance dynamics. Notably, the contrast in deviation between individuals and group members is most pronounced when the level of interaction within the group is high. Ultimately, our findings consistently indicate that higher levels of interaction lead to more substantial deviations in the trajectories of encountered individuals and underscore the significant role of social dynamics in influencing pedestrian behavior during frontal encounters.","PeriodicalId":93276,"journal":{"name":"Collective dynamics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asymmetries in Group-Individual Collision Avoidance due to Social Factors\",\"authors\":\"Adrien Gregorj, Zeynep Yücel, F. Zanlungo, Takayuki Kanda\",\"doi\":\"10.17815/cd.2024.150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research centers on analyzing frontal encounters between dyads (two-person groups) and individuals, aiming to measure each participant's role in avoiding collisions based on their deviation from their intended path. To achieve this, we establish the intended trajectory of each party by taking into account their walking direction leading up to the encounter. The largest discrepancy between this intended path and the observed path can be interpreted as the pedestrian's maximum lateral deviation.We show a noteworthy discrepancy in deviation between group members and individuals in face-to-face encounters. Furthermore, we conduct an in-depth analysis of how the intensity of interaction among group members impacts collision avoidance dynamics. Notably, the contrast in deviation between individuals and group members is most pronounced when the level of interaction within the group is high. Ultimately, our findings consistently indicate that higher levels of interaction lead to more substantial deviations in the trajectories of encountered individuals and underscore the significant role of social dynamics in influencing pedestrian behavior during frontal encounters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Collective dynamics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Collective dynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17815/cd.2024.150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collective dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17815/cd.2024.150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究的核心是分析二人组(两人小组)和个人之间的正面交锋,目的是根据每个参与者偏离预定路径的情况来衡量他们在避免碰撞中所起的作用。为此,我们根据双方在相遇前的行走方向,确定了他们的预定轨迹。我们发现,在面对面相遇时,群体成员和个人之间的偏离程度存在显著差异。此外,我们还深入分析了群体成员之间的互动强度如何影响避撞动态。值得注意的是,当群体内的互动程度较高时,个人与群体成员之间的偏差对比最为明显。最终,我们的研究结果一致表明,互动程度越高,遇到的个体的轨迹偏差就越大,并强调了社会动态在影响正面相遇时行人行为方面的重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Asymmetries in Group-Individual Collision Avoidance due to Social Factors
This research centers on analyzing frontal encounters between dyads (two-person groups) and individuals, aiming to measure each participant's role in avoiding collisions based on their deviation from their intended path. To achieve this, we establish the intended trajectory of each party by taking into account their walking direction leading up to the encounter. The largest discrepancy between this intended path and the observed path can be interpreted as the pedestrian's maximum lateral deviation.We show a noteworthy discrepancy in deviation between group members and individuals in face-to-face encounters. Furthermore, we conduct an in-depth analysis of how the intensity of interaction among group members impacts collision avoidance dynamics. Notably, the contrast in deviation between individuals and group members is most pronounced when the level of interaction within the group is high. Ultimately, our findings consistently indicate that higher levels of interaction lead to more substantial deviations in the trajectories of encountered individuals and underscore the significant role of social dynamics in influencing pedestrian behavior during frontal encounters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Improving Pedestrian Dynamics Predictions Using Neighboring Factors Evaluation of Data Fitting Approaches for Speed/Flow Density Relationships Numerical and Theoretical Analysis of a New One-Dimensional Cellular Automaton Model for Bidirectional Flows Are Depth Field Cameras Preserving Anonymity? Pilot Study of Mental Simulation of People Movement During Evacuations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1