患者对产后立即放置宫内节育器与延迟放置宫内节育器的偏好。

IF 8.3 2区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005647
Theresa Christensen, Susanna Ostrowski, Arden McAllister, Blythe Bynum, Marilyn M Schapira, Sarita Sonalkar
{"title":"患者对产后立即放置宫内节育器与延迟放置宫内节育器的偏好。","authors":"Theresa Christensen, Susanna Ostrowski, Arden McAllister, Blythe Bynum, Marilyn M Schapira, Sarita Sonalkar","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To use choice-based conjoint survey methodology to evaluate patient values and decision making regarding immediate compared with delayed placement of postpartum intrauterine devices (IUDs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study in which we surveyed 200 nonpregnant, parous patients. Participants chose between hypothetical postpartum IUDs varying in multiple attributes (hormonal or nonhormonal IUD type, placement timing, 1-year efficacy, expulsion risk, risk of lost strings, and malposition risk). The primary outcome was preference for immediate compared with delayed postpartum IUD placement and importance of placement timing relative to other attributes. Secondarily, we evaluated whether demographic and neighborhood characteristics were associated with timing preference and attribute importance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 190 participants for analysis. Most participants (62.6%) preferred delayed placement. There was no significant difference in timing preference by race ( P =.28) or block-level Area Deprivation Index score ( P =.27). Patients who preferred immediate placement were more likely to have public insurance than private insurance (70.4% vs 29.6%, P =.04); however, the majority of patients (55.1%) with public insurance still preferred delayed placement. Attributes of IUD type, malposition risk, 1-year efficacy, and expulsion risk all had greater effects on patient decision making than placement timing. There was no difference in attribute importance by race ( P =.30), Area Deprivation Index score ( P =.88), or insurance type ( P =.22).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients preferred the higher efficacy and lower complication rates of delayed postpartum IUD placement over the convenience of immediate placement. Insurance considerations may affect these timing preferences. There was no difference in attribute importance between demographic groups or based on neighborhood-level factors, indicating that, although both immediate and delayed postpartum IUD placement should be offered, counseling should not vary according to individual demographic characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":5,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Preferences for Immediate Compared With Delayed Postpartum Intrauterine Device Placement.\",\"authors\":\"Theresa Christensen, Susanna Ostrowski, Arden McAllister, Blythe Bynum, Marilyn M Schapira, Sarita Sonalkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To use choice-based conjoint survey methodology to evaluate patient values and decision making regarding immediate compared with delayed placement of postpartum intrauterine devices (IUDs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study in which we surveyed 200 nonpregnant, parous patients. Participants chose between hypothetical postpartum IUDs varying in multiple attributes (hormonal or nonhormonal IUD type, placement timing, 1-year efficacy, expulsion risk, risk of lost strings, and malposition risk). The primary outcome was preference for immediate compared with delayed postpartum IUD placement and importance of placement timing relative to other attributes. Secondarily, we evaluated whether demographic and neighborhood characteristics were associated with timing preference and attribute importance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 190 participants for analysis. Most participants (62.6%) preferred delayed placement. There was no significant difference in timing preference by race ( P =.28) or block-level Area Deprivation Index score ( P =.27). Patients who preferred immediate placement were more likely to have public insurance than private insurance (70.4% vs 29.6%, P =.04); however, the majority of patients (55.1%) with public insurance still preferred delayed placement. Attributes of IUD type, malposition risk, 1-year efficacy, and expulsion risk all had greater effects on patient decision making than placement timing. There was no difference in attribute importance by race ( P =.30), Area Deprivation Index score ( P =.88), or insurance type ( P =.22).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients preferred the higher efficacy and lower complication rates of delayed postpartum IUD placement over the convenience of immediate placement. Insurance considerations may affect these timing preferences. There was no difference in attribute importance between demographic groups or based on neighborhood-level factors, indicating that, although both immediate and delayed postpartum IUD placement should be offered, counseling should not vary according to individual demographic characteristics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":5,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005647\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005647","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:采用基于选择的联合调查方法,评估患者对产后立即放置宫内节育器与延迟放置宫内节育器的价值观和决策:采用基于选择的联合调查方法,评估患者对产后立即放置宫内节育器(IUDs)与延迟放置宫内节育器(IUDs)的价值观和决策:我们进行了一项横断面研究,调查了 200 名未怀孕的准妈妈患者。参与者在假定的产后宫内节育器中进行了选择,这些宫内节育器具有多种属性(激素或非激素宫内节育器类型、放置时间、1 年疗效、排出风险、断线风险和错位风险)。主要结果是产后立即放置宫内节育器与延迟放置宫内节育器的偏好,以及放置时间相对于其他属性的重要性。其次,我们还评估了人口统计学特征和邻里特征是否与时间偏好和属性重要性相关:结果:我们纳入了 190 名参与者进行分析。大多数参与者(62.6%)倾向于延迟放置。不同种族(P=.28)或不同街区的地区贫困指数得分(P=.27)在时间偏好上没有明显差异。与私人保险相比,倾向于立即放置宫内节育器的患者更有可能拥有公共保险(70.4% vs 29.6%,P=.04);然而,大多数拥有公共保险的患者(55.1%)仍然倾向于延迟放置宫内节育器。与放置时间相比,宫内节育器类型、错位风险、1 年疗效和排出风险等属性对患者决策的影响更大。种族(P=.30)、地区贫困指数得分(P=.88)或保险类型(P=.22)对属性重要性的影响没有差异:结论:与立即放置宫内节育器的便利性相比,患者更倾向于产后延迟放置宫内节育器,因为其疗效更高、并发症发生率更低。保险因素可能会影响这些时间偏好。不同人口统计学群体或邻里因素对属性重要性的影响没有差异,这表明尽管应提供产后立即和延迟放置宫内节育器的服务,但咨询不应因个人人口统计学特征而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient Preferences for Immediate Compared With Delayed Postpartum Intrauterine Device Placement.

Objective: To use choice-based conjoint survey methodology to evaluate patient values and decision making regarding immediate compared with delayed placement of postpartum intrauterine devices (IUDs).

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study in which we surveyed 200 nonpregnant, parous patients. Participants chose between hypothetical postpartum IUDs varying in multiple attributes (hormonal or nonhormonal IUD type, placement timing, 1-year efficacy, expulsion risk, risk of lost strings, and malposition risk). The primary outcome was preference for immediate compared with delayed postpartum IUD placement and importance of placement timing relative to other attributes. Secondarily, we evaluated whether demographic and neighborhood characteristics were associated with timing preference and attribute importance.

Results: We included 190 participants for analysis. Most participants (62.6%) preferred delayed placement. There was no significant difference in timing preference by race ( P =.28) or block-level Area Deprivation Index score ( P =.27). Patients who preferred immediate placement were more likely to have public insurance than private insurance (70.4% vs 29.6%, P =.04); however, the majority of patients (55.1%) with public insurance still preferred delayed placement. Attributes of IUD type, malposition risk, 1-year efficacy, and expulsion risk all had greater effects on patient decision making than placement timing. There was no difference in attribute importance by race ( P =.30), Area Deprivation Index score ( P =.88), or insurance type ( P =.22).

Conclusion: Patients preferred the higher efficacy and lower complication rates of delayed postpartum IUD placement over the convenience of immediate placement. Insurance considerations may affect these timing preferences. There was no difference in attribute importance between demographic groups or based on neighborhood-level factors, indicating that, although both immediate and delayed postpartum IUD placement should be offered, counseling should not vary according to individual demographic characteristics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
4978
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces is a leading interdisciplinary journal that brings together chemists, engineers, physicists, and biologists to explore the development and utilization of newly-discovered materials and interfacial processes for specific applications. Our journal has experienced remarkable growth since its establishment in 2009, both in terms of the number of articles published and the impact of the research showcased. We are proud to foster a truly global community, with the majority of published articles originating from outside the United States, reflecting the rapid growth of applied research worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Decreased levels of phosphorylated synuclein in plasma are correlated with poststroke cognitive impairment. Small molecule inhibitor DDQ-treated hippocampal neuronal cells show improved neurite outgrowth and synaptic branching. Polyethylene glycol fusion repair of severed sciatic nerves accelerates recovery of nociceptive sensory perceptions in male and female rats of different strains. Reduced mesencephalic astrocyte-derived neurotrophic factor expression by mutant androgen receptor contributes to neurodegeneration in a model of spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy pathology. Enhanced autophagic clearance of amyloid-β via histone deacetylase 6-mediated V-ATPase assembly and lysosomal acidification protects against Alzheimer's disease in vitro and in vivo.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1