探索神经姑息治疗中的伦理问题。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Seminars in Neurology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1787775
Annie L Gula, Jennifer K Walter, Wynne Morrison, Matthew P Kirschen
{"title":"探索神经姑息治疗中的伦理问题。","authors":"Annie L Gula, Jennifer K Walter, Wynne Morrison, Matthew P Kirschen","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neurologic illnesses can be challenging to diagnose, involve changes in consciousness, and are often complicated by prognostic uncertainty. These disorders can affect how individuals interact with their environment, and as a result, many ethical concerns may arise related to their medical care. Key ethical issues in neuropalliative care include shared decision-making, evolving autonomy and capacity, best interest and harm principles, beneficence and nonmaleficence, futile and inappropriate care, justice and equity, and ableism. The four core principles of medical ethics, beneficence, nonmaleficence, justice, and autonomy, are foundational in considering approaches to these ethical challenges. Shared decision-making is rooted in the principle of autonomy. Evolving autonomy and capacity evoke autonomy, beneficence, and nonmaleficence. The best interest and harm principles are rooted in beneficence and nonmaleficence. Questions of futility and inappropriate care are founded in the principles of nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice. Ableism invokes questions of nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice. Practitioners of neurology will encounter ethical challenges in their practice. Framing decisions around the core ethical principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice will help clinicians navigate challenging situations while acknowledging and respecting each patient's individual story.</p>","PeriodicalId":49544,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"534-542"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Ethical Dimensions in Neuropalliative Care.\",\"authors\":\"Annie L Gula, Jennifer K Walter, Wynne Morrison, Matthew P Kirschen\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1787775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Neurologic illnesses can be challenging to diagnose, involve changes in consciousness, and are often complicated by prognostic uncertainty. These disorders can affect how individuals interact with their environment, and as a result, many ethical concerns may arise related to their medical care. Key ethical issues in neuropalliative care include shared decision-making, evolving autonomy and capacity, best interest and harm principles, beneficence and nonmaleficence, futile and inappropriate care, justice and equity, and ableism. The four core principles of medical ethics, beneficence, nonmaleficence, justice, and autonomy, are foundational in considering approaches to these ethical challenges. Shared decision-making is rooted in the principle of autonomy. Evolving autonomy and capacity evoke autonomy, beneficence, and nonmaleficence. The best interest and harm principles are rooted in beneficence and nonmaleficence. Questions of futility and inappropriate care are founded in the principles of nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice. Ableism invokes questions of nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice. Practitioners of neurology will encounter ethical challenges in their practice. Framing decisions around the core ethical principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice will help clinicians navigate challenging situations while acknowledging and respecting each patient's individual story.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"534-542\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787775\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787775","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

神经系统疾病的诊断可能具有挑战性,涉及意识的变化,而且往往因预后的不确定性而变得复杂。这些疾病会影响个人与环境的互动方式,因此在医疗护理方面可能会出现许多伦理问题。神经姑息治疗中的关键伦理问题包括共同决策、不断发展的自主性和能力、最佳利益和损害原则、惠益性和非惠益性、无用和不适当的治疗、公正和公平以及能力歧视。医学伦理的四个核心原则,即 "受益原则"、"非恶意原则"、"公正原则 "和 "自主原则",是考虑如何应对这些伦理挑战的基础。共同决策植根于自主原则。不断发展的自主性和能力唤起了自主性、受益原则和非渎职原则。最佳利益和伤害原则植根于 "受益 "和 "非渎职 "原则。无用论和不恰当护理的问题建立在非恶意原则、自主原则和公正原则的基础上。能力缺失会引发非牟利性、自主性和公正性问题。神经病学从业者在其实践中会遇到伦理挑战。围绕 "受益"、"非渎职"、"自主 "和 "公正 "等核心伦理原则做出决策,将有助于临床医生在承认和尊重每位患者的个人经历的同时,应对各种挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring Ethical Dimensions in Neuropalliative Care.

Neurologic illnesses can be challenging to diagnose, involve changes in consciousness, and are often complicated by prognostic uncertainty. These disorders can affect how individuals interact with their environment, and as a result, many ethical concerns may arise related to their medical care. Key ethical issues in neuropalliative care include shared decision-making, evolving autonomy and capacity, best interest and harm principles, beneficence and nonmaleficence, futile and inappropriate care, justice and equity, and ableism. The four core principles of medical ethics, beneficence, nonmaleficence, justice, and autonomy, are foundational in considering approaches to these ethical challenges. Shared decision-making is rooted in the principle of autonomy. Evolving autonomy and capacity evoke autonomy, beneficence, and nonmaleficence. The best interest and harm principles are rooted in beneficence and nonmaleficence. Questions of futility and inappropriate care are founded in the principles of nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice. Ableism invokes questions of nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice. Practitioners of neurology will encounter ethical challenges in their practice. Framing decisions around the core ethical principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice will help clinicians navigate challenging situations while acknowledging and respecting each patient's individual story.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Neurology
Seminars in Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
65
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Neurology is a review journal on current trends in the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of neurological diseases. Areas of coverage include multiple sclerosis, central nervous system infections, muscular dystrophy, neuro-immunology, spinal disorders, strokes, epilepsy, motor neuron diseases, movement disorders, higher cortical function, neuro-genetics and neuro-ophthamology. Each issue is presented under the direction of an expert guest editor, and invited contributors focus on a single, high-interest clinical topic. Up-to-the-minute coverage of the latest information in the field makes this journal an invaluable resource for neurologists and residents.
期刊最新文献
Altered Mental Status at the Extreme: Behavioral Evaluation of Disorders of Consciousness. Altered Mental Status in Cancer. The Approach to Altered Mental Status in the Intensive Care Unit. Approach to Altered Mental Status in Pregnancy and Postpartum. Altered Mental Status in the Solid-Organ Transplant Recipient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1