Aldo Brassetti, Giuseppe Chiacchio, Umberto Anceschi, Alfredo Bove, Mariaconsiglia Ferriero, Simone D'Annunzio, Leonardo Misuraca, Salvatore Guaglianone, Gabriele Tuderti, Riccardo Mastroianni, Francesco Tedesco, Loris Cacciatore, Flavia Proietti, Simone R Flammia, Cosimo De Nunzio, Gabriele Cozzi, Costantino Leonardo, Andrea B Galosi, Giuseppe Simone
{"title":"机器人辅助腹股沟淋巴结切除术治疗阴茎癌和外阴癌:范围界定综述。","authors":"Aldo Brassetti, Giuseppe Chiacchio, Umberto Anceschi, Alfredo Bove, Mariaconsiglia Ferriero, Simone D'Annunzio, Leonardo Misuraca, Salvatore Guaglianone, Gabriele Tuderti, Riccardo Mastroianni, Francesco Tedesco, Loris Cacciatore, Flavia Proietti, Simone R Flammia, Cosimo De Nunzio, Gabriele Cozzi, Costantino Leonardo, Andrea B Galosi, Giuseppe Simone","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05532-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Inguinal lymph nodes dissection (ILND) is recommended in patients presenting with high-risk penile (PC) or vulvar cancers (VC). Though, this surgical procedure is underused because of its anticipated morbidity. Minimally invasive approaches were proposed to minimize complications associated with open surgery. In this review, we analyze current available data exploring intra and perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted ILND (RAIL).</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>On April 9<sup>th</sup>, 2023, a literature search was conducted using the PubMed and Scopus databases. The search employed the combination of the following terms: (\"robotic assisted\" OR \"robot-assisted\" OR \"robotic\") AND (\"inguinal lymph node dissection\" OR \"lymphadenectomy\") AND (\"penile cancer\" OR \"vulvar cancer\"). Out of the 404 identified articles, 18 were used for the present scoping review and their results were reported according to the PRISMA statement.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Data on 171 patients, ranging in age from 32 to 85 years, were obtained. Most of them (90.6%) harbored a penile squamous cell carcinoma and presented with no palpable nodes (85%). Operation time (OT) ranged between 45 and 300 min. Estimated blood loss varied from 10 to 300 mL. One single intra-operative complication was reported and one conversion to open was recorded. The lymph nodes (LNs) count spanned from 3 to 26 per groin, with 17 studies reporting a median yield >7 nodes. Hospital stay was 1-7 days, while the duration of drainage ranged from 4 to 72 days. Post-operative complications included lymphocele (22.2%; 0-100%), lymphedema (13.4%; 0-40%), cellulitis (11.1%; 0-25%), skin necrosis (8.7%; 0-15.4%). seroma (3.5%; 0-20%) and wound breakdown/wound infection (2.9%; 0-10%). Out of the included studies, 7 provided at least a 12-month follow-up, with recurrence-free rates ranging from 50% to 100% in patients affected by penile cancer and from 92% to 100% in vulvar cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The available evidence on RAIL for the treatment of PC and VC is limited. The approach appears to be safe and effective, as it provides an adequate lymph node yield while ensuring a minimally morbid postoperative course and a short hospital stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"76 3","pages":"278-285"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robot-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy to treat penile and vulvar cancers: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Aldo Brassetti, Giuseppe Chiacchio, Umberto Anceschi, Alfredo Bove, Mariaconsiglia Ferriero, Simone D'Annunzio, Leonardo Misuraca, Salvatore Guaglianone, Gabriele Tuderti, Riccardo Mastroianni, Francesco Tedesco, Loris Cacciatore, Flavia Proietti, Simone R Flammia, Cosimo De Nunzio, Gabriele Cozzi, Costantino Leonardo, Andrea B Galosi, Giuseppe Simone\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05532-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Inguinal lymph nodes dissection (ILND) is recommended in patients presenting with high-risk penile (PC) or vulvar cancers (VC). Though, this surgical procedure is underused because of its anticipated morbidity. Minimally invasive approaches were proposed to minimize complications associated with open surgery. In this review, we analyze current available data exploring intra and perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted ILND (RAIL).</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>On April 9<sup>th</sup>, 2023, a literature search was conducted using the PubMed and Scopus databases. The search employed the combination of the following terms: (\\\"robotic assisted\\\" OR \\\"robot-assisted\\\" OR \\\"robotic\\\") AND (\\\"inguinal lymph node dissection\\\" OR \\\"lymphadenectomy\\\") AND (\\\"penile cancer\\\" OR \\\"vulvar cancer\\\"). Out of the 404 identified articles, 18 were used for the present scoping review and their results were reported according to the PRISMA statement.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Data on 171 patients, ranging in age from 32 to 85 years, were obtained. Most of them (90.6%) harbored a penile squamous cell carcinoma and presented with no palpable nodes (85%). Operation time (OT) ranged between 45 and 300 min. Estimated blood loss varied from 10 to 300 mL. One single intra-operative complication was reported and one conversion to open was recorded. The lymph nodes (LNs) count spanned from 3 to 26 per groin, with 17 studies reporting a median yield >7 nodes. Hospital stay was 1-7 days, while the duration of drainage ranged from 4 to 72 days. Post-operative complications included lymphocele (22.2%; 0-100%), lymphedema (13.4%; 0-40%), cellulitis (11.1%; 0-25%), skin necrosis (8.7%; 0-15.4%). seroma (3.5%; 0-20%) and wound breakdown/wound infection (2.9%; 0-10%). Out of the included studies, 7 provided at least a 12-month follow-up, with recurrence-free rates ranging from 50% to 100% in patients affected by penile cancer and from 92% to 100% in vulvar cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The available evidence on RAIL for the treatment of PC and VC is limited. The approach appears to be safe and effective, as it provides an adequate lymph node yield while ensuring a minimally morbid postoperative course and a short hospital stay.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva Urology and Nephrology\",\"volume\":\"76 3\",\"pages\":\"278-285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva Urology and Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05532-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05532-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Robot-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy to treat penile and vulvar cancers: a scoping review.
Introduction: Inguinal lymph nodes dissection (ILND) is recommended in patients presenting with high-risk penile (PC) or vulvar cancers (VC). Though, this surgical procedure is underused because of its anticipated morbidity. Minimally invasive approaches were proposed to minimize complications associated with open surgery. In this review, we analyze current available data exploring intra and perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted ILND (RAIL).
Evidence acquisition: On April 9th, 2023, a literature search was conducted using the PubMed and Scopus databases. The search employed the combination of the following terms: ("robotic assisted" OR "robot-assisted" OR "robotic") AND ("inguinal lymph node dissection" OR "lymphadenectomy") AND ("penile cancer" OR "vulvar cancer"). Out of the 404 identified articles, 18 were used for the present scoping review and their results were reported according to the PRISMA statement.
Evidence synthesis: Data on 171 patients, ranging in age from 32 to 85 years, were obtained. Most of them (90.6%) harbored a penile squamous cell carcinoma and presented with no palpable nodes (85%). Operation time (OT) ranged between 45 and 300 min. Estimated blood loss varied from 10 to 300 mL. One single intra-operative complication was reported and one conversion to open was recorded. The lymph nodes (LNs) count spanned from 3 to 26 per groin, with 17 studies reporting a median yield >7 nodes. Hospital stay was 1-7 days, while the duration of drainage ranged from 4 to 72 days. Post-operative complications included lymphocele (22.2%; 0-100%), lymphedema (13.4%; 0-40%), cellulitis (11.1%; 0-25%), skin necrosis (8.7%; 0-15.4%). seroma (3.5%; 0-20%) and wound breakdown/wound infection (2.9%; 0-10%). Out of the included studies, 7 provided at least a 12-month follow-up, with recurrence-free rates ranging from 50% to 100% in patients affected by penile cancer and from 92% to 100% in vulvar cancer patients.
Conclusions: The available evidence on RAIL for the treatment of PC and VC is limited. The approach appears to be safe and effective, as it provides an adequate lymph node yield while ensuring a minimally morbid postoperative course and a short hospital stay.