Yulia Dyachkova, Cornelia Dunger-Baldauf, Nathalie Barbier, Jenny Devenport, Stefan Franzén, Gbenga Kazeem, Thomas Künzel, Pierre Mancini, Giacomo Mordenti, Knut Richert, Antonia Ridolfi, Daniel Saure
{"title":"您想继续单臂试验吗?药物开发中的单臂试验和后监管空间的考虑。","authors":"Yulia Dyachkova, Cornelia Dunger-Baldauf, Nathalie Barbier, Jenny Devenport, Stefan Franzén, Gbenga Kazeem, Thomas Künzel, Pierre Mancini, Giacomo Mordenti, Knut Richert, Antonia Ridolfi, Daniel Saure","doi":"10.1002/pst.2412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Single-arm trials (SATs), while not preferred, remain in use throughout the drug development cycle. They may be accepted by regulators in particular contexts (e.g., in oncology or rare diseases) when the potential effects of new treatments are very large and placebo treatment is unethical. However, in the postregulatory space, SATs are common, and perhaps even more poorly suited to address the questions of interest. In this manuscript, we review regulatory and HTA positions on SATs; challenges posed by SATs to address research questions beyond regulators, evolving statistical methods to provide context for SATs, case studies where SATs could and could not address questions of interest, and communication strategies to influence decision making and optimize study design to address evidence needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19934,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do You Want to Stay Single? Considerations on Single-Arm Trials in Drug Development and the Postregulatory Space.\",\"authors\":\"Yulia Dyachkova, Cornelia Dunger-Baldauf, Nathalie Barbier, Jenny Devenport, Stefan Franzén, Gbenga Kazeem, Thomas Künzel, Pierre Mancini, Giacomo Mordenti, Knut Richert, Antonia Ridolfi, Daniel Saure\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pst.2412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Single-arm trials (SATs), while not preferred, remain in use throughout the drug development cycle. They may be accepted by regulators in particular contexts (e.g., in oncology or rare diseases) when the potential effects of new treatments are very large and placebo treatment is unethical. However, in the postregulatory space, SATs are common, and perhaps even more poorly suited to address the questions of interest. In this manuscript, we review regulatory and HTA positions on SATs; challenges posed by SATs to address research questions beyond regulators, evolving statistical methods to provide context for SATs, case studies where SATs could and could not address questions of interest, and communication strategies to influence decision making and optimize study design to address evidence needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmaceutical Statistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmaceutical Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.2412\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.2412","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
单臂试验(SAT)虽然不是首选,但在整个药物开发周期中仍在使用。在特定情况下(如肿瘤或罕见病),如果新疗法的潜在效果非常大,而安慰剂治疗又不道德,监管机构可能会接受单臂试验。然而,在后监管领域,SATs 很常见,也许更不适合解决人们感兴趣的问题。在本手稿中,我们回顾了监管机构和 HTA 对 SAT 的立场;SAT 在解决监管机构之外的研究问题时所面临的挑战;为 SAT 提供背景的不断发展的统计方法;SAT 能够和不能解决相关问题的案例研究;以及影响决策和优化研究设计以满足证据需求的沟通策略。
Do You Want to Stay Single? Considerations on Single-Arm Trials in Drug Development and the Postregulatory Space.
Single-arm trials (SATs), while not preferred, remain in use throughout the drug development cycle. They may be accepted by regulators in particular contexts (e.g., in oncology or rare diseases) when the potential effects of new treatments are very large and placebo treatment is unethical. However, in the postregulatory space, SATs are common, and perhaps even more poorly suited to address the questions of interest. In this manuscript, we review regulatory and HTA positions on SATs; challenges posed by SATs to address research questions beyond regulators, evolving statistical methods to provide context for SATs, case studies where SATs could and could not address questions of interest, and communication strategies to influence decision making and optimize study design to address evidence needs.
期刊介绍:
Pharmaceutical Statistics is an industry-led initiative, tackling real problems in statistical applications. The Journal publishes papers that share experiences in the practical application of statistics within the pharmaceutical industry. It covers all aspects of pharmaceutical statistical applications from discovery, through pre-clinical development, clinical development, post-marketing surveillance, consumer health, production, epidemiology, and health economics.
The Journal is both international and multidisciplinary. It includes high quality practical papers, case studies and review papers.