环境监管与制造业就业:来自中国 "十一五 "规划的证据

IF 5.5 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS 中国经济评论 Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102226
Jiaqi Liao , Ning Zhang
{"title":"环境监管与制造业就业:来自中国 \"十一五 \"规划的证据","authors":"Jiaqi Liao ,&nbsp;Ning Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper employs a difference-in-difference-in-differences (DDD) identification strategy to investigate the impact of environmental regulation on employment in the manufacturing sector in China, using the country's Eleventh Five-Year Plan (FYP) as a quasi-experiment. Our results indicate that the 11th FYP had a significant negative impact on firm employment, with every 10% increase in SO<sub>2</sub> reduction targets resulting in a 3.1% decrease in employment for firms in high-pollution industries. This corresponds to a reduction of approximately 9 people per firm. Our findings indicate that firms primarily reduce SO<sub>2</sub> emissions by reducing production levels and transitioning to cleaner energy sources. Additionally, we show that political promotion incentives played a role in driving the decline in employment. Heterogeneous tests reveal that the impact was more significant for private firms, SMEs and trade-exposed firms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48285,"journal":{"name":"中国经济评论","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 102226"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X24001159/pdfft?md5=5e4bb30323ab45a65bc49e01a62bcc76&pid=1-s2.0-S1043951X24001159-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental regulation and manufacturing employment: Evidence from China's Eleventh Five-Year Plan\",\"authors\":\"Jiaqi Liao ,&nbsp;Ning Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper employs a difference-in-difference-in-differences (DDD) identification strategy to investigate the impact of environmental regulation on employment in the manufacturing sector in China, using the country's Eleventh Five-Year Plan (FYP) as a quasi-experiment. Our results indicate that the 11th FYP had a significant negative impact on firm employment, with every 10% increase in SO<sub>2</sub> reduction targets resulting in a 3.1% decrease in employment for firms in high-pollution industries. This corresponds to a reduction of approximately 9 people per firm. Our findings indicate that firms primarily reduce SO<sub>2</sub> emissions by reducing production levels and transitioning to cleaner energy sources. Additionally, we show that political promotion incentives played a role in driving the decline in employment. Heterogeneous tests reveal that the impact was more significant for private firms, SMEs and trade-exposed firms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国经济评论\",\"volume\":\"87 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X24001159/pdfft?md5=5e4bb30323ab45a65bc49e01a62bcc76&pid=1-s2.0-S1043951X24001159-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国经济评论\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X24001159\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国经济评论","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X24001159","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以中国的 "十一五 "规划(FYP)为准实验对象,采用 "差分中的差分"(DDD)识别策略,研究环境规制对中国制造业就业的影响。结果表明,"十一五 "规划对企业就业产生了显著的负面影响,二氧化硫减排目标每增加 10%,高污染行业的企业就业就会减少 3.1%。这相当于每家企业减少约 9 人。我们的研究结果表明,企业主要通过降低生产水平和向清洁能源过渡来减少二氧化硫排放。此外,我们还发现政治促进激励措施在推动就业人数减少方面发挥了作用。异质性检验显示,对私营企业、中小企业和贸易风险企业的影响更为显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Environmental regulation and manufacturing employment: Evidence from China's Eleventh Five-Year Plan

This paper employs a difference-in-difference-in-differences (DDD) identification strategy to investigate the impact of environmental regulation on employment in the manufacturing sector in China, using the country's Eleventh Five-Year Plan (FYP) as a quasi-experiment. Our results indicate that the 11th FYP had a significant negative impact on firm employment, with every 10% increase in SO2 reduction targets resulting in a 3.1% decrease in employment for firms in high-pollution industries. This corresponds to a reduction of approximately 9 people per firm. Our findings indicate that firms primarily reduce SO2 emissions by reducing production levels and transitioning to cleaner energy sources. Additionally, we show that political promotion incentives played a role in driving the decline in employment. Heterogeneous tests reveal that the impact was more significant for private firms, SMEs and trade-exposed firms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中国经济评论
中国经济评论 ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
4.40%
发文量
380
期刊介绍: The China Economic Review publishes original works of scholarship which add to the knowledge of the economy of China and to economies as a discipline. We seek, in particular, papers dealing with policy, performance and institutional change. Empirical papers normally use a formal model, a data set, and standard statistical techniques. Submissions are subjected to double-blind peer review.
期刊最新文献
A proposition of lose-lose: Detrimental consequences of trade wars Do bankruptcy judicial reforms improve small and medium enterprises' investment efficiency? Evidence from China Can green mergers and acquisitions drive firms' transition to green exports? Evidence from China's manufacturing sector Transparency matters: Public vs. non-public use of the counter-cyclical factor and renminbi exchange rate volatility How digital firms shape innovation networks: Evidence from corporate patent citations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1