印度尼西亚的珊瑚礁恢复:从世界上最大的珊瑚礁恢复国吸取的经验教训

IF 3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Biodiversity and Conservation Pub Date : 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1007/s10531-024-02897-8
Rowan Watt-Pringle, Tries B. Razak, Jamaluddin Jompa, Rohani Ambo-Rappe, Alyssa N. Kostaman, David J. Smith
{"title":"印度尼西亚的珊瑚礁恢复:从世界上最大的珊瑚礁恢复国吸取的经验教训","authors":"Rowan Watt-Pringle, Tries B. Razak, Jamaluddin Jompa, Rohani Ambo-Rappe, Alyssa N. Kostaman, David J. Smith","doi":"10.1007/s10531-024-02897-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Indonesia is the global coral reef restoration leader by number of projects, yet these remain diverse and disparate. This study reviews the status of Indonesian coral reef restoration within a framework of international common best practice (CBP) that incorporates internationally-recognised Standards for Ecological Restoration (SER). This framework is used to formulate recommendations for a formal network of reef restoration practitioners with the purview to develop and implement a national restoration roadmap. Forty-five projects were surveyed to determine how projects have been planned and implemented. This was compared with recommendations from CBP. There is particular scope to increase quantitative data collection, reinforce community involvement, improve ecological data collection, and standardise monitoring protocols. While 84% of projects reported quantifiable goals, 64% did not quantify goals during planning and 61% did not incorporate climate-smart design features. Quantitative reef monitoring surveys were absent in 22% of projects. The majority of projects did not quantify important ecological metrics like coral community composition/diversity (96%), coral health/bleaching (89%), benthic community (62%), and coral survival (62%). Indonesia has the capacity, regulations, and networks to position itself as a reef restoration driver in the Coral Triangle region; this will require increased coordination, alignment, and quantification of restoration. A structured, collaborative, and iterative national network of various stakeholders would facilitate the development of a national restoration roadmap based on adaptive management strategies. This would aid in standardising project planning, monitoring, and reporting. Efforts should include an increased focus on climate change adaptation goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":8843,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity and Conservation","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coral reef restoration in Indonesia: lessons learnt from the world’s largest coral restoration nation\",\"authors\":\"Rowan Watt-Pringle, Tries B. Razak, Jamaluddin Jompa, Rohani Ambo-Rappe, Alyssa N. Kostaman, David J. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10531-024-02897-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Indonesia is the global coral reef restoration leader by number of projects, yet these remain diverse and disparate. This study reviews the status of Indonesian coral reef restoration within a framework of international common best practice (CBP) that incorporates internationally-recognised Standards for Ecological Restoration (SER). This framework is used to formulate recommendations for a formal network of reef restoration practitioners with the purview to develop and implement a national restoration roadmap. Forty-five projects were surveyed to determine how projects have been planned and implemented. This was compared with recommendations from CBP. There is particular scope to increase quantitative data collection, reinforce community involvement, improve ecological data collection, and standardise monitoring protocols. While 84% of projects reported quantifiable goals, 64% did not quantify goals during planning and 61% did not incorporate climate-smart design features. Quantitative reef monitoring surveys were absent in 22% of projects. The majority of projects did not quantify important ecological metrics like coral community composition/diversity (96%), coral health/bleaching (89%), benthic community (62%), and coral survival (62%). Indonesia has the capacity, regulations, and networks to position itself as a reef restoration driver in the Coral Triangle region; this will require increased coordination, alignment, and quantification of restoration. A structured, collaborative, and iterative national network of various stakeholders would facilitate the development of a national restoration roadmap based on adaptive management strategies. This would aid in standardising project planning, monitoring, and reporting. Efforts should include an increased focus on climate change adaptation goals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biodiversity and Conservation\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biodiversity and Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-024-02897-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodiversity and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-024-02897-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从项目数量上看,印度尼西亚是全球珊瑚礁恢复领域的领头羊,但这些项目仍然多种多样、参差不齐。本研究在国际通用最佳实践(CBP)框架内回顾了印度尼西亚珊瑚礁恢复的现状,该框架包含了国际公认的生态恢复标准(SER)。该框架用于为珊瑚礁修复从业人员正式网络制定建议,该网络的职责是制定和实施国家修复路线图。对 45 个项目进行了调查,以确定项目是如何规划和实施的。这与 CBP 的建议进行了比较。在增加定量数据收集、加强社区参与、改进生态数据收集和标准化监测协议方面存在特别大的空间。虽然 84% 的项目报告了可量化的目标,但 64% 的项目在规划期间没有量化目标,61% 的项目没有纳入气候智能设计功能。22% 的项目没有进行定量的珊瑚礁监测调查。大多数项目没有量化重要的生态指标,如珊瑚群落组成/多样性(96%)、珊瑚健康/白化(89%)、底栖群落(62%)和珊瑚存活率(62%)。印度尼西亚有能力、法规和网络将自己定位为珊瑚礁恢复在珊瑚三角区的推动者;这将需要加强协调、调整和量化恢复工作。一个由各利益相关方组成的结构化、协作式和迭代式国家网络将有助于根据适应性管理战略制定国家恢复路线图。这将有助于项目规划、监测和报告的标准化。应更加重视适应气候变化的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Coral reef restoration in Indonesia: lessons learnt from the world’s largest coral restoration nation

Indonesia is the global coral reef restoration leader by number of projects, yet these remain diverse and disparate. This study reviews the status of Indonesian coral reef restoration within a framework of international common best practice (CBP) that incorporates internationally-recognised Standards for Ecological Restoration (SER). This framework is used to formulate recommendations for a formal network of reef restoration practitioners with the purview to develop and implement a national restoration roadmap. Forty-five projects were surveyed to determine how projects have been planned and implemented. This was compared with recommendations from CBP. There is particular scope to increase quantitative data collection, reinforce community involvement, improve ecological data collection, and standardise monitoring protocols. While 84% of projects reported quantifiable goals, 64% did not quantify goals during planning and 61% did not incorporate climate-smart design features. Quantitative reef monitoring surveys were absent in 22% of projects. The majority of projects did not quantify important ecological metrics like coral community composition/diversity (96%), coral health/bleaching (89%), benthic community (62%), and coral survival (62%). Indonesia has the capacity, regulations, and networks to position itself as a reef restoration driver in the Coral Triangle region; this will require increased coordination, alignment, and quantification of restoration. A structured, collaborative, and iterative national network of various stakeholders would facilitate the development of a national restoration roadmap based on adaptive management strategies. This would aid in standardising project planning, monitoring, and reporting. Efforts should include an increased focus on climate change adaptation goals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biodiversity and Conservation
Biodiversity and Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
153
审稿时长
9-18 weeks
期刊介绍: Biodiversity and Conservation is an international journal that publishes articles on all aspects of biological diversity-its description, analysis and conservation, and its controlled rational use by humankind. The scope of Biodiversity and Conservation is wide and multidisciplinary, and embraces all life-forms. The journal presents research papers, as well as editorials, comments and research notes on biodiversity and conservation, and contributions dealing with the practicalities of conservation management, economic, social and political issues. The journal provides a forum for examining conflicts between sustainable development and human dependence on biodiversity in agriculture, environmental management and biotechnology, and encourages contributions from developing countries to promote broad global perspectives on matters of biodiversity and conservation.
期刊最新文献
An assessment of the implementation of the EU policy for conservation varieties from 2009 to 2023 and its relationship to Geographical Indications The iconic Jubaea chilensis teeters on the edge of local extinction: a plea for enhanced conservation policies High site fidelity and reduced survival of a mycophagous mammal after prescribed fire An assessment of liverwort richness, endemicity and conservation in a megadiverse country - Colombia Wilderness areas maintain mammal assemblage in subtropical mountain forests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1