163 验证职业环境中同时存在的空气传播化学品的采样和分析技术

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Annals Of Work Exposures and Health Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1093/annweh/wxae035.226
Ya-Lun Yu, Shih-Wei Tsai
{"title":"163 验证职业环境中同时存在的空气传播化学品的采样和分析技术","authors":"Ya-Lun Yu, Shih-Wei Tsai","doi":"10.1093/annweh/wxae035.226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, more harmful volatile organic compounds are found in the workplace and exposed to them has many adverse health effects. Various occupational exposure limits are available to protect workers’ health for toxic substances. Nevertheless, air sampling and analysis methods have also been developed to detect harmful substances. Regarding health risk assessment, compared with only knowing the concentrations of fewer substances, it’ll be more beneficial if we can detect multiple compounds simultaneously. Therefore, there’s a need to develop more comprehensive and convenient way to sample and analyze air samples. In this study, we established the qualitative and quantitative conditions of co-existing airborne chemicals through taking air samples by gas bags, followed by SPME extraction, solvent-free technique, and GC/MS analysis. The findings from validation procedure showed it provides convenient and sensitive method to determine various chemicals in workplace’s air concurrently. To prepare known concentrations standard vapors, we used zero-air system and air sampling bags with the VOCs standard containing 54 different substances. Moreover, we used the micro-injection needle to inject 0.16mL liquid, which was 200μg/mL, into the bags, followed by vaporizing to produce vapor with the concentration of each VOC of about 1ppm. Carboxen-PDMS SPME fiber was selected in this study then adsorbed and extracted for 40 minutes. The results showed 49 different VOCs can be identified, including benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, o,p,m-xylene, etc. Besides, linear ranges and sample stabilities were also validated. Furthermore, the established method was applied to determine the airborne chemicals in hairdressing and nail salons.","PeriodicalId":8362,"journal":{"name":"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health","volume":"136 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"163 Validations of the sampling and analysis techniques for the co-existing airborne chemicals in occupational settings\",\"authors\":\"Ya-Lun Yu, Shih-Wei Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/annweh/wxae035.226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nowadays, more harmful volatile organic compounds are found in the workplace and exposed to them has many adverse health effects. Various occupational exposure limits are available to protect workers’ health for toxic substances. Nevertheless, air sampling and analysis methods have also been developed to detect harmful substances. Regarding health risk assessment, compared with only knowing the concentrations of fewer substances, it’ll be more beneficial if we can detect multiple compounds simultaneously. Therefore, there’s a need to develop more comprehensive and convenient way to sample and analyze air samples. In this study, we established the qualitative and quantitative conditions of co-existing airborne chemicals through taking air samples by gas bags, followed by SPME extraction, solvent-free technique, and GC/MS analysis. The findings from validation procedure showed it provides convenient and sensitive method to determine various chemicals in workplace’s air concurrently. To prepare known concentrations standard vapors, we used zero-air system and air sampling bags with the VOCs standard containing 54 different substances. Moreover, we used the micro-injection needle to inject 0.16mL liquid, which was 200μg/mL, into the bags, followed by vaporizing to produce vapor with the concentration of each VOC of about 1ppm. Carboxen-PDMS SPME fiber was selected in this study then adsorbed and extracted for 40 minutes. The results showed 49 different VOCs can be identified, including benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, o,p,m-xylene, etc. Besides, linear ranges and sample stabilities were also validated. Furthermore, the established method was applied to determine the airborne chemicals in hairdressing and nail salons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health\",\"volume\":\"136 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxae035.226\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxae035.226","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如今,工作场所发现了更多有害的挥发性有机化合物,接触这些物质会对健康产生许多不利影响。为了保护工人的健康,对有毒物质规定了各种职业接触限值。不过,人们也开发了空气采样和分析方法来检测有害物质。在健康风险评估方面,与只知道少数几种物质的浓度相比,如果我们能同时检测多种化合物,将会更有益处。因此,有必要开发更全面、更便捷的空气样本采样和分析方法。在这项研究中,我们通过气袋采集空气样本,然后进行 SPME 萃取、无溶剂技术和 GC/MS 分析,确定了空气中并存化学物质的定性和定量条件。验证程序的结果表明,它为同时测定工作场所空气中的各种化学物质提供了方便灵敏的方法。为了制备已知浓度的标准蒸汽,我们使用了零空气系统和装有 54 种不同物质的挥发性有机化合物标准物质的空气采样袋。此外,我们使用微量注射针将 0.16 毫升浓度为 200 微克/毫升的液体注入袋中,然后蒸发产生每种挥发性有机化合物浓度约为 1ppm 的蒸汽。本研究选择了 Carboxen-PDMS SPME 纤维,然后吸附和萃取 40 分钟。结果表明,可以鉴定出 49 种不同的挥发性有机化合物,包括苯、甲苯、乙苯、邻、对、间二甲苯等。此外,该方法的线性范围和样品稳定性也得到了验证。此外,所建立的方法还被用于检测美发店和美甲店空气中的化学物质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
163 Validations of the sampling and analysis techniques for the co-existing airborne chemicals in occupational settings
Nowadays, more harmful volatile organic compounds are found in the workplace and exposed to them has many adverse health effects. Various occupational exposure limits are available to protect workers’ health for toxic substances. Nevertheless, air sampling and analysis methods have also been developed to detect harmful substances. Regarding health risk assessment, compared with only knowing the concentrations of fewer substances, it’ll be more beneficial if we can detect multiple compounds simultaneously. Therefore, there’s a need to develop more comprehensive and convenient way to sample and analyze air samples. In this study, we established the qualitative and quantitative conditions of co-existing airborne chemicals through taking air samples by gas bags, followed by SPME extraction, solvent-free technique, and GC/MS analysis. The findings from validation procedure showed it provides convenient and sensitive method to determine various chemicals in workplace’s air concurrently. To prepare known concentrations standard vapors, we used zero-air system and air sampling bags with the VOCs standard containing 54 different substances. Moreover, we used the micro-injection needle to inject 0.16mL liquid, which was 200μg/mL, into the bags, followed by vaporizing to produce vapor with the concentration of each VOC of about 1ppm. Carboxen-PDMS SPME fiber was selected in this study then adsorbed and extracted for 40 minutes. The results showed 49 different VOCs can be identified, including benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, o,p,m-xylene, etc. Besides, linear ranges and sample stabilities were also validated. Furthermore, the established method was applied to determine the airborne chemicals in hairdressing and nail salons.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals Of Work Exposures and Health
Annals Of Work Exposures and Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
19.20%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: About the Journal Annals of Work Exposures and Health is dedicated to presenting advances in exposure science supporting the recognition, quantification, and control of exposures at work, and epidemiological studies on their effects on human health and well-being. A key question we apply to submission is, "Is this paper going to help readers better understand, quantify, and control conditions at work that adversely or positively affect health and well-being?" We are interested in high quality scientific research addressing: the quantification of work exposures, including chemical, biological, physical, biomechanical, and psychosocial, and the elements of work organization giving rise to such exposures; the relationship between these exposures and the acute and chronic health consequences for those exposed and their families and communities; populations at special risk of work-related exposures including women, under-represented minorities, immigrants, and other vulnerable groups such as temporary, contingent and informal sector workers; the effectiveness of interventions addressing exposure and risk including production technologies, work process engineering, and personal protective systems; policies and management approaches to reduce risk and improve health and well-being among workers, their families or communities; methodologies and mechanisms that underlie the quantification and/or control of exposure and risk. There is heavy pressure on space in the journal, and the above interests mean that we do not usually publish papers that simply report local conditions without generalizable results. We are also unlikely to publish reports on human health and well-being without information on the work exposure characteristics giving rise to the effects. We particularly welcome contributions from scientists based in, or addressing conditions in, developing economies that fall within the above scope.
期刊最新文献
Measuring improvements in occupational health and safety in the artificial stone benchtop industry. Occupational exposure to chrysotile in an asbestos cement factory in Kyrgyzstan. Healthcare workers' experiences protecting themselves and their families during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020-2021. Managing SARS-CoV-2 transmission risk in workplace COVID-19 outbreaks. "Why should care workers be any different from prison workers?" A qualitative study of second-hand smoke exposure during home-care visits and potential measures to eliminate exposure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1